Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Darwinism maintains that different groups of living things (phyla) developed from a common ancestory and grew apart after some time. According to Darwinism, living things grew apart from one another like the branches on a treeBut the fossil record shows just the opposite Some 100 phyla suddenly emerged in the Cambrian Age.
The fossil record is what is incomplete.
Originally posted by Black Rob✅ apes are beautifully adapted to their environment. Some creatures have gone so far they don't need to evolve.
creatures evolve to better fit their environments.not every creature has to fit their environment
Originally posted by Blue nocturneHaven't I?
Falcon you still haven't answerd my claims against natural selection.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonLet me give you an example of the evolution that we have created on the small scale. Breeding is simply evolution. A poodle never lived in the wild, but we have them today. We have all kinds of dogs that are not suitable for the wild, that we humans have breed. What this shows is that the dog has a lot of potential variations in its genes. These variations help the dog adapt and change to a ever changing world.
That's not evolution that's varation.
EDIT: Varation does not compliment evolution because varations are combinations of already exsisting genes.
Originally posted by Captain Falcon
there is none. Animals don't change just like that. They change over time because of the complexity. Life is so complex, it happens very slowly.
Change because of complexity 😆 according to Darwin organisms change because of natural selections do you what your defending?