Prove creationism...I'll shut up!

Started by Blue nocturne63 pages
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Not all animals that are crossed like Mules are sterile.

Name one.

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
on second thought, no.Can't sum it up. They're short movies though. Unlike creation, evolution can't be summed up in a poorly written book of lies. AKA the bible.

right it can be summed up as a theory with hardly any evidence.
The only thing they have left is "Mutations create new life" theory.

Name one part of the bible and creationism that is scientific and true. If I were god, I would atleast put 'made by god' on the things I made. Wouldn't you?

sickle cell anemia is an example of a failing evolutionary trait. It developed as an immunity to maleria but causes clotting problems. Therefore, without modern medical care, sickle cell would eventually disappear or refine itself through anatomical changes to better protect from maleria while not harming the person.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
right it can be summed up as a theory with hardly any evidence.
The only thing they have left is "Mutations create new life" theory.
watch the ****ing movies. You don't understand this. No scientist has ever said that. *******. Sorry I called you an @sshole, but I'm very pissed off at how dumb you really are.

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
watch the ****ing movies. You don't understand this. No scientist has ever said that. *******. Sorry I called you an @sshole, but I'm very pissed off at how dumb you really are.
Viruses aren't alive but they carry DNA, when they change a cell, the cell chenges and becomes really different. A small thing like a virus or a drug, can really affect a person.

"It's the little things, that make the big things happen"

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Name one.

I don't remember what it is called but it is a cross between a lion and a tiger. I think it's called a Liger.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
sickle cell anemia is an example of a failing evolutionary trait. It developed as an immunity to maleria but causes clotting problems. Therefore, without modern medical care, sickle cell would eventually disappear or refine itself through anatomical changes to better protect from maleria while not harming the person.

But that's a mutation and mutations are never 100% helpful and they never create new species.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I don't remember what it is called but it is a cross between a lion and a tiger. I think it's called a Liger.
NO WAI

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
Viruses aren't alive but they carry DNA, when they change a cell, the cell chenges and becomes really different. A small thing like a virus or a drug, can really affect a person.

"It's the little things, that make the big things happen"

And I'm stupid, It's called a mutation how does a mutation create complex organisms like Darwinist say?

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
But that's a mutation and mutations are never 100% helpful/

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mutation

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
And I'm stupid, It's called a mutation how does a mutation create complex organisms like Darwinist say?
development over time. dummy.

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mutation

I know what it is my question is how does mutations produce complex organisms and since when were mutations beneficial to survival?

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
development over time. dummy.

dots

Captian falcon your an IDIOT.

http://www.sierrasafarizoo.com/animals/liger.htm

Blue nocturne
Please read this.

o rly, then how come everyone else agreed with me. We're not talking about evolution. See first post. We're talking about the facts of creation and I still haven't seen any. The thread is 'Prove creationism' not 'Evolution or creationism' dummy.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
http://www.sierrasafarizoo.com/animals/liger.htm

Blue nocturne
Please read this.

I don't think he will. Cool though.

Shakyamunsion read this
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/05/2/l_052_02.html

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
o rly, then how come everyone else agreed with me. We're not talking about evolution. See first post. We're talking about the facts of creation and I still haven't seen any. The thread is 'Prove creationism' not 'Evolution or creationism' dummy.

I asked you if you wanted to debate darwinsim and you said yes, also you haven't proved your case go to the evolution thread and you'll see mine. I don't think you even know how evolution works, do you know?