Sora(Kingdom Hearts) vs Link(Legend of Zelda)

Started by TheAuraAngel116 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Proof: Link reflects lightning, as depicted in pictures and videos.

Your rebuttal?

Bring me the videos and images please.

You know, "no u" is not an actual argument. To the Sora side.

I know. Just feel like making him work for it.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

Lightning is arching out around him and judging by the angle that bit of lightning would not have hit him. We also have no idea of when Link put up his sword judging by an image.

YouTube video

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
YouTube video

See inFamous comparison and examples of the LLLC judging by appearances of things while ignoring the fact that no matter how much they complain, that ball is not moving at lightning speed.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
See inFamous comparison and examples of the LLLC judging by appearances of things while ignoring the fact that no matter how much they complain, that ball is not moving at lightning speed.
Gameplay mechanic.

Do you have a legitimate argument?

My argument is based around the double standards of the statements of my opposition. Not legitimate?

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
My argument is based around the double standards of the statements of my opposition. Not legitimate?
I have no double standard. Base your argument in logic and evidence.

Evidence: Link reflects lightning.
Rebuttal?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I have no double standard. Base your argument in logic and evidence.

Evidence: Link reflects lightning.
Rebuttal?

Some of the other pillars do however.

Rebuttal: Link reflects an electrical sphere shaped attack, not lightning.

What... who summoned lightning in two different threads? -,-

Magnet still takes him.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
Some of the other pillars do however.

Rebuttal: Link reflects an electrical sphere shaped attack, not lightning.

You're not arguing with them, you're arguing with me.

That's a gameplay mechanic, Ganondorf won't intentionally slow down lightning when someone's trying to kill him. That would be retarded.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You're not arguing with them, you're arguing with me.

That's a gameplay mechanic, Ganondorf won't intentionally slow down lightning when someone's [b]trying to kill him. That would be retarded. [/B]

But since they agree with you and you are all part of a loose alliance, their mistakes do reflect back on you.

Rebuttal: Video game villains and villains in general do stupid things. Ganon is no exception.

But since they agree with you and you are all part of a loose alliance, their mistakes do reflect back on you.
Ad hominem, appeal to blah blah, **** off with it. Argue it logically. 😐

Rebuttal: Video game villains and villains in general do stupid things. Ganon is no exception.
Assumption.

Ganon has, and has always had, full speed lightning in his power set, slowing it down intentionally is tantamount to sabotage.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
K.

Link's a lightning timer. Have at it, let's see if you kids can disprove this shit yet?

I did that ages ago.

Do I need to bring in Occams Razor AGAIN? It still trashes this argument, you know.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Ad hominem, appeal to blah blah, **** off with it. Argue it logically. 😐

Assumption.

Ganon has, and has always had, full speed lightning in his power set, slowing it down intentionally is tantamount to sabotage.

My my, touchy aren't we?

Fairly common place fact actually. Yet to see a character disprove it.

Did not say he didn't. Again reference the inFamous example which fits in a logical stand point from a fantasy perspective but was not accepted because....well, it doesn't support the lightning timing.

Assumption.

And it isn't an assumption to say that he wouldn't do it?

Originally posted by TacDavey
I did that ages ago.

Do I need to bring in Occams Razor AGAIN? It still trashes this argument, you know.

Occam's razor, lightning = lightning.
Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
My my, touchy aren't we?

Fairly common place fact actually. Yet to see a character disprove it.

Did not say he didn't. Again reference the inFamous example which fits in a logical stand point from a fantasy perspective but was not accepted because....well, it doesn't support the lightning timing.


You could say I'm sick of being right and being ignored. I quite like most of you guys outside of these threads, but I'm beginning to want to throttle you all inside of them.
-You can't and never have disproven it, none of you.
-You claim you have and can, all of you.

Condescension makes me angry, so I use the **** word.

Again, assumption. You're assuming Ganon would intentionally slow down his lightning when he doesn't have to, for no apparent reason other than to let Link reflect it?

No, it was not accepted because it's unfounded conjecture. 😐 Ganondorf can pull entire countries into other dimensions, and conjure powerful lightning, he's one of the most intelligent villains in gaming, the smartest character in the series, a manipulative genius, a chessmaster, ect, but chooses to play Tennis? 😐 What the ****?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Occam's razor, lightning = lightning.

Actually, Occam's Razor supports the fact that it isn't lightning.

You version has too many points that you yourself added in in order to rationalize the presupposed stance that the attack had to be lightning.

My stance goes off of what we see in the game.

Mine is simpler. Thus Occams Razor says it's the more logical one, unless you can prove it's impossible for my explanation to be true. You haven't yet, by the way.

Originally posted by TacDavey
Actually, Occam's Razor supports the fact that it isn't lightning.

You version has too many points that you yourself added in in order to rationalize the presupposed stance that the attack had to be lightning.

My stance goes off of what we see in the game.

Mine is simpler. Thus Occams Razor says it's the more logical one, unless you can prove it's impossible for my explanation to be true. You haven't yet, by the way.

I don't have to disprove stubborn, illogical conjecture by someone who's apparently never played the ****ing game and has his mind closed to arguments that he disagrees with based solely on the fact the feats point to something he doesn't like.

IE, Link reflects lightning, therefore, he's a ****ing lightning timer. Simple.

Your little hypothesis which you push as "simple" is unfounded, nothing points to it at all, and is a rationalization invented on the spot to try and take a feat from a character.

IE, Gtfo with it and argue it logically, or just gtfo.