You could still make a logical assumption from this. In KOTOR II you get Freedon Nadd's short lightsaber, which is said to be more powerful than a normal light saber.. This really has nothing to do with anything but I just wanted to point it out. We also knew that Nadd was uber powerful and might have been more powerful than Kun. Even if he wasn't more powerful than Kun(which I still maintain he was), he would still be able to take down Dooku and Mace.
Originally posted by zod360
The KOTOR ere was the golden age of saber dueling. Count Dooku and Mace were both in the top 4 in that era. They easily take this.
So the Kotor Era was the golden age and that would make dooku and Mace win.
Okay, i'm just going to assume you mean the PT era...
In which that was said in reference to the OT not like ever. So that statement means jack shit.
Arguing that Nadd would lose because the two were in a time of your self proclaimed "Golden Age" Of Jedi is a ridiculous and unfounded Assumption.
We do not know how powerful Nadd was. We don't know if he'd either crack those two in half or whether he would get a spanking from the two.
This thread is useless.
Yes, we have proof of him knocking down Vodo as a spirit, causing a cave in on Kun as a spirit, healing Kun as a spirit, and all of this as a spirit. And as we know the spirit's power is only a fraction of when he was a body. I think Dooku and Mace would have enough trouble with his spirit.. Unfortunately we know very little about him as a man, except for the fact that Naga Sadow taught him himself, which says more than Kun learning from Sadow's teachings. I'd say only the Ancient Sith in the Golden Age are more powerful than Nadd, and maybe DN luke.