Try to win this thread

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
That's not logical at all, loser.

I declared that you Don't Win, the Backdoor way of Calling you a loser, but I didn't actually call you a Loser, So I don't Lose. And You Lose twice for calling me a Loser when you've already lost.

justjakk loses... ROYALGUARD loses because he picked Bloigen over a dead fish in another thread... Thorinn loses for having a gratuitous avatar.

Down to Itzak and myself with a slight lead to Itzak, who's been less unscrupulous about this.

Slight lead goes to me for admitting this, and back again for saying that.

*wins*

Well that wasnt hardermm

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
That's not logical at all, loser.

Thorinn: the rules are clearly explained.

Mist loses... Barker didn't specify whether or not I will win in the future and therefore loses.

Thorinn loses.

*pretends that he wins but actually loses* ermm

Okey-dokey.

And Barker by double-losing loses privileges as to deciding winning or not winning.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Thorinn loses.

so in all reality, nobody wins, and everybody lose's, quit brilliant Lord P.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Only a loser would try to declare me a loser... loser.

You lose.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.

Remember the first rule. I've already declared you a loser; everything you say that follows is nullified and void.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Mist loses... Barker didn't specify whether or not I will win in the future and therefore loses.

Declaring losers doesn't make you a loser; if you've already been declared a loser you simply can't declare losers.

"Losers" by the way, can refer to my unposted judge of your character or my having posted it, i.e. only a loser would try and declare me a loser.

Originally posted by Barker
But You've lost in the Present, which means the Future me will still outsmart you, making it Impossible that I'll lose to you in the future. And since you started the thread, I automatically win Forever.

*is a loser* weep

HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Declaring losers doesn't make you a loser; if you've already been declared a loser you simply can't declare losers.

"Losers" by the way, can refer to my unposted judge of your character or my having posted it, i.e. only a loser would try and declare me a loser.

Which means, Logically, that I win. Again.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.

*pokes Barker*

If I'm a loser, you're a loser, which leaves Itzak. I think we should declare him the winner.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
*pokes Barker*

If I'm a loser, you're a loser, which leaves Itzak. I think we should declare him the winner.

You don't win, Itzak doesn't Win, due to the "Everyone Doesn't Win Law".

I can never be killed.

Besides, you just called me a loser, so you Don't Win Anyway.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.

Why are you still speaking? I don't remember giving you permission.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Why are you still speaking? I don't remember giving you permission.

H.S. 6 Is Winning too, but not as much as me.