Originally posted by Lord Urizen
What the hell are you talking about ?She didn't glorify anything....she aimed to help people who suffered and were impoverous, and helped them she did.
What the?
Is this one of those things where people are gonna talk about something based on what they VAGUELY know?
If so, please don't bother.
First motive -
Mother Teresa's stated motive for the work is that of proselytization for religious fundamentalism, for the most extreme interpretation of Catholic doctrine. Do you think multiplying is the answer? Overpopulation and lack of condoms spreading AIDS? No.
Well Mother Teresa's motive lies in exactly that.
Second practice -
She had taken money - over a million dollars - from Charles Keating, the Lincoln Savings and Loans swindler, even though it had been shown to her that the money was stolen.
Second, she has been an ally of the most reactionary forces in India and in many other countries.
Thirdly- she has campaigned to prevent Ireland from ceasing to be the only country in Europe with a constitutional ban on divorce.
I mean wtf?!
She did glorify suffering and poverty. She thought suffering is good, and she doesn't use pain relievers in her clinics and so forth.
One of the most salient examples of people's willingness to believe anything if it is garbed in the appearance of holiness is the uncritical acceptance of the idea of Mother Teresa.
She was a horrible hypocrite!