Originally posted by Tha C-MasterSorry, I got to say no also.........
Could I ask a question. (To the women) ALL things considered equal, would a woman receive the same pleasure from a penis no matter its size?
Sometimes I wonder why oh why do I visit these threads........I must be really bored........
Originally posted by botankus
We need an answer to that question from all angles. Cap't?
I don't think gay guys like it really big... I mean the butt is not as wide as the vagina... It must hurt a lot more...
Originally posted by Eis
My ex's penis was really big it was actually part of the reason why I didn't want to have sex with him.I don't think gay guys like it really big... I mean the butt is not as wide as the vagina... It must hurt a lot more...
I have seen some seriously wide butts, I don't know about that one.
Mindship> You're entitled to your opinion on the strength of the female sex-drive. I can see that you are male... 😉
Yes, as I wrote above men are more physically oriented than women. However, claiming that a picture of a handsome guy can't get women to fall off their chairs is entirely wrong 😄
No, it's my experience that not only CAN'T men copulate 24/7, this peculiar idea is actually damaging to mens emotional and psychological well-being.
And I think it's sad you compare men to lab-rats. Why is it so important to you that the men-can-24/7 is true??
There is pressure both on teenage-boys and girls, true. But society also puts a lot of pressure on girls/women to remain virtous, not to be slu*tty, to remain pure etc. etc. etc. In how many movies you know of are the very sexually active woman actually the heroine?
To your question: Men are attracted to physical stuff. Maybe that's the reason they use female avatars?
Luciferia> "Judgeing by what I know about the people in my life and thier attitudes towards sex, it's more to do with personal opinion than gender."
I'll second that. It has less to do with gender, than with personal opinions.
sexyking> Ah, but I said "negative". Do you view "stud" and "pimp" as negative words? Do they not, rather, suggest one-helluva-loverboy??
I'll also second lil bitchiness. As I wrote above, men in general are physically attracted, women in general are socially attracted. So it does not matter if the guy isn't the most handsome man in the world, he'll the girl with wits and charms...
AC> Yes, some girls/women want money/status just as some men/guys want young/big breast etc.
Actually I think, that it does not depend on gender. We all have an idea of what is physcally attractive. But I'd rather have sex with a normal-looking guy with wits who knows what he's doing in bed, than some Adonis who's relied on his looks all his life. I think most normal guys feel the same way towards girls.
As a teen I once had sex with a guy who told me not to ruffle his hair!!!! 😄 I mean...
It depends on the situation though doesn't it, Omega?
Would you rather have casual sex encounters with a guy who was physically attractive or a guy that wasn't? Being that the main point there is to get satisfaction with no strings attached (or attached, if you're into that).
If it's a relationship then of course you don't necessarily want to date an *******, right?
-AC
I understand that the point of the thread is to address how much harder it is for a guy to get laid than it is for a woman. I suppose to some that is unfair. But, one of the things that I think has changed in more modern times is that women do want sex just as much as men want sex. (and they did in the past, they were just affraid) However, there was a time when the world, not just the teen world, was terribly uninformed about sex. In modern times, women know they can't get pregnant from kissing. So, while the stigma of virtuous women has changed, the concept of women subscribing to that virtuous notion has not.
Women want sex just as much as men. They have sex with the guys they want to, that's the difference. Before, the idea was that women should settle down with a nice clean guy that looked like he wouldn't be a criminal and conversly that men could choose any woman they wanted and the women should be greatful for being chosen.
Today, that notion is obsolete. I suppose that's the result of womens liberation. However, one current side effect of the womens lib movement is that now, men have become the dim-witted ignorants that are lucky to have the women choose them. I think that's ridiculous. Let a man openly say that a particular woman is an idiot and the whole room calls him a pig, let a woman say the same of a man and she's a hero.
So, the idea that an ugly chick is going to get laid more than an ugly guy is kinda skewed. The ugly guy just has to fish in the corresponding pond and vice versa. Go for it with the chicks on your level and stop holding out for a perfect 10 to take pitty on you.