Originally posted by Soujaboy
Since when?Oh yea, and this is a feature that the 360 doesn't have.
The wii has a internet browser that is sweet because you can use the wii-mote insteed of a mouse 😉
Plus there are other advantages
No, you fail, as you obviously think that you are perfect and what you say is the only thing that makes difference.
When did I say this? 😕
What YOU think is bad, isn't neccessary bad for someone else.
When did I say that my opinion was fact?
I don't like Wii much, don't care about it's game selection, or anything else, but IT IS NOT BAD.
That's nice that you don't think the Wii is bad.
PS3 has great graphics, great look
I didn't say it didn't...
I haven't found much bad about it besides Sony being ass-holes and all.
yeah, they're asses alright.
SO WHAT if Blu-Ray is useless now? It won't be always, and PS3 CAN play regular DVD's too.
Indeed, but if one of their main selling gimiks is "We have Blu-Ray, lawlz", and the Blu-Ray is not only useless, but actually has anegative effect on your gaming experience, then it's not much of a "gimik" is it? It's a simple case of Sony overpromising and underdelivering... again.
I have the money for it. I have all for it.
Congrats, however not everyone can spend the 600+ for the system, not including 50 dollar controllers and the like.
And it is bad because some ridicolous fanboy (you, if you haven't realized it yet) says that "it is weak"?
And I'm a fanboy, how?
Yeah. Right. Go home.
Know what your talking about.
And for the record, I DON'T think that X-Box 360 and Wii are bad consoles at all. I think they are good. I just like PS3 more. I am sure that some other people like X-Box 360 and Wii more then PS3.
I am happy for you... no really, I am.
I don't try to go around saying that X360 and Wii "suck". Why? Because I don't CARE if other people play other consoles then the one I like. I have enough self-esteem so I don't need to convert other people to my side. You obviously haven't.
Do you see me converting anyone? Let's take a look back shall we? I gave my opinion on a system, saying it sucks. YOU over reacted and got in MY face, posting an irrelevent and insulting picture. I retaliated, and YOU overreacted, AGAIN. So, I'm retaliating, again.
You like X-Box 360 or Wii more? Good for you, I hope you enjoy playing them.
Thanks! 🙂
Don't come to spout ridicolous hating about the one console other people like, though. Nobody needs it.
I apologize, I didn't realize how incredibly sensitive you were, I'll take that into consideration in the future.
Originally posted by Blaxican
When did I say this? 😕When did I say that my opinion was fact?
That's nice that you don't think the Wii is bad.
I didn't say it didn't...
yeah, they're asses alright.
Indeed, but if one of their main selling gimiks is "We have Blu-Ray, lawlz", and the Blu-Ray is not only useless, but actually has anegative effect on your gaming experience, then it's not much of a "gimik" is it? It's a simple case of Sony overpromising and underdelivering... again.
Congrats, however not everyone can spend the 600+ for the system, not including 50 dollar controllers and the like.
And I'm a fanboy, how?
Know what your talking about.
I am happy for you... no really, I am.
Do you see me converting anyone? Let's take a look back shall we? I gave my opinion on a system, saying it sucks. YOU over reacted and got in MY face, posting an irrelevent and insulting picture. I retaliated, and YOU overreacted, AGAIN. So, I'm retaliating, again.
Thanks! 🙂
I apologize, I didn't realize how incredibly sensitive you were, I'll take that into consideration in the future.
Only your opinion? Puh-leaze. You simply said "PS3 sucks ass" like it is a fact. Not "I think PS3 sucks ass.", or "IMO, PS3 sucks ass".
Hardly sounds like opinion, huh? No, it sounds like a fanboy opinion. Which it was.
Maybe if you had bothered to state actual reasons why it sucks ass, it would not have sounded stupid, but you didn't, just started spouting some bullcrap about how it ripped off stuff (which doesn't make it bad).
Your orginal post sounded like a post made by a fanboy. You can't change the actual facts.
Only your opinion? Puh-leaze. You simply said "PS3 sucks ass" like it is a fact. Not "I think PS3 sucks ass.", or "IMO, PS3 sucks ass".
So what your saying is that your entire argument is based off an assumption that you made. Find me an actual quote were I said that my opinion was fact please.
Hardly sounds like opinion, huh?
It does, actually.
No, it sounds like a fanboy opinion. Which it was.
yet you have continued to not give any prof to me being a fanboy other then "z0mg you hate t3h PSE!!!!(!91!!!eleven!!
If I had never personally played it, researched every little nook and cranny about it, it's specs, and then compared it to the other systems specs, experience I had when playing those systems etc, and said it sucked ass, THEN I would be a fanboy. However, I DID do all that was mentioned above, and it sucks, compared to the other systems.
Maybe if you had bothered to state actual reasons why it sucks ass, it would not have sounded stupid,
I did, you just didn't likethe reasons. Why? because, obviously, your a PS3 fanboy 😉
but you didn't, just started spouting some bullcrap about how it ripped off stuff (which doesn't make it bad).
It may sound like bullcrap fanboy, but it's not. And ripping off the major aspect of another system just so that your own crappy system can sell better shows a complete lack of ingenuity on Sony's part.
Exec 1: "Hey, I have an idea! Since we're too unoriginal to make up something that could make gameplay more fun, except for our Blu-Ray which only decreases gameplay since we have no idea how to make it work, let's rip off Nintendo's ingenuitive controller and then sell our system for three times the price of a Wii!
Exec 2: Yeah, lol! For the price of our mediocre system which brings nothing new to the table, you can buy both a Wii AND a 360!
Your orginal post sounded like a post made by a fanboy. You can't change the actual facts.
Sorry but you fail, again. The only one being a fanboy here is you.
"So what if the PS3 is a rip off of another system! That doesn't make it bad! So what if the Blu-Ray sucks, that doesn't make it a bad system!"
Originally posted by Blaxican
So what your saying is that your entire argument is based off an assumption that you made. Find me an actual quote were I said that my opinion was fact please.It does, actually.
yet you have continued to not give any prof to me being a fanboy other then "z0mg you hate t3h PSE!!!!(!91!!!eleven!!
If I had never personally played it, researched every little nook and cranny about it, it's specs, and then compared it to the other systems specs, experience I had when playing those systems etc, and said it sucked ass, THEN I would be a fanboy. However, I DID do all that was mentioned above, and it sucks, compared to the other systems.
I did, you just didn't likethe reasons. Why? because, obviously, your a PS3 fanboy 😉
It may sound like bullcrap fanboy, but it's not. And ripping off the major aspect of another system just so that your own crappy system can sell better shows a complete lack of ingenuity on Sony's part.
Exec 1: "Hey, I have an idea! Since we're too unoriginal to make up something that could make gameplay more fun, except for our Blu-Ray which only decreases gameplay since we have no idea how to make it work, let's rip off Nintendo's ingenuitive controller and then sell our system for three times the price of a Wii!
Exec 2: Yeah, lol! For the price of our mediocre system which brings nothing new to the table, you can buy both a Wii AND a 360!
Sorry but you fail, again. The only one being a fanboy here is you.
"So what if the PS3 is a rip off of another system! That doesn't make it bad! So what if the Blu-Ray sucks, that doesn't make it a bad system!"
Want to go there? Okay. Here is your quote.
Originally posted by Blaxican
Ps3 sucks ass and is a compelte rip-off of the 360 and Wii, the only "original" thing about it is the Blu-Ray, which is currently usless.
First of all, you did not state anything that would make it a "complete rip-off of the 360 and Wii", besides that sentence. First of all, it obviously isn't one. Second off all...you just said that "PS3 sucks"...and you failed to state any reasons why it would. Bad graphics? Bad games? Bad sounds? Something else? What YOU think sucks isn't the universal standard.
And I would be hard pressed to find ANYTHING original from X-Box 360 or Wii anyway...especially X-Box 360. There is something or someone that has done the things they have before. And so what if PS3 has taken something from them? Is that a bad thing? Just because 360 had a online system, does that mean that PS3 never should have one?
And I am the fanboy here? So stating that Wii and X-Box are GOOD systems, but IN MY OPINION (something that YOU failed to say in your initial post) PS3 is better. I like it more, thus I think it is better. Guess admitting that other people might like the two other systems better and there is nothing wrong with it is sign of fanboyness too?
Try harder.
Originally posted by DarkCrawlerThe PS3 sucks DC just admit it 😐
Want to go there? Okay. Here is your quote.First of all, you did not state anything that would make it a "complete rip-off of the 360 and Wii", besides that sentence. First of all, it obviously isn't one. Second off all...you just said that "PS3 sucks"...and you failed to state any reasons why it would. Bad graphics? Bad games? Bad sounds? Something else? What YOU think sucks isn't the universal standard.
And I would be hard pressed to find ANYTHING original from X-Box 360 or Wii anyway...especially X-Box 360. There is something or someone that has done the things they have before. And so what if PS3 has taken something from them? Is that a bad thing? Just because 360 had a online system, does that mean that PS3 never should have one?
And I am the fanboy here? So stating that Wii and X-Box are GOOD systems, but IN MY OPINION (something that YOU failed to say in your initial post) PS3 is better. I like it more, thus I think it is better. Guess admitting that other people might like the two other systems better and there is nothing wrong with it is sign of fanboyness too?
Try harder.
Originally posted by batdude123And, I'm all about the damage and duribility...
???I really don't understand this at all. IMO, Surfer and Strange are tied for the top. Norrin can deal more damage, but Strange's powers come with the added perks of magic. Turning people in boxes (not to mention even if they don't turn into a box, it still deals 120+ points of damage), healing his teammates when they're hurt, mind controlling enemies to fight for him, radial attacks in which the damage dealt to the enemy gets converted into more health for him, etc.
Norrin has really powerful blasts, but that's about it. 😬
Thor definitely isn't the most powerful guy in the game. He's a weak version of Silver Surfer in MUA, imo.
Strange may be ultra in comics, but he is a a mere shadow of him in MUA.
Actually, Surfer seems really weak to me in that game as well. He has like one powerful attack, and the other takes time to charge.
Thor is more powerful than Surfer in that game (mind you, I didn't get Surfer until I started a new game, and unlocked him in the old).
Thor is the most powerful, although his lighting attack is incredibly weak...
My Thor can beat any person faster than the rest of the team can...
Ghost Rider is a good character though. Surfer, and Strange are too, but they don't make me think they are the best.
My team is only there for the characters, and not the powers, Strange is weak in that game, but he is still in my party all the time, since I first got him.
Originally posted by bigbran
And, I'm all about the damage and duribility...
Healing, who needs it, honestly? What part of the game, do you really need to heal anyone?
Same goes for mind controlling enemies.
That radial attack is weak as hell, although I don't remember it giving him health, but that may be me.Strange may be ultra in comics, but he is a a mere shadow of him in MUA.
Actually, Surfer seems really weak to me in that game as well. He has like one powerful attack, and the other takes time to charge.
Thor is more powerful than Surfer in that game (mind you, I didn't get Surfer until I started a new game, and unlocked him in the old).
Thor is the most powerful, although his lighting attack is incredibly weak...My Thor can beat any person faster than the rest of the team can...
Ghost Rider is a good character though. Surfer, and Strange are too, but they don't make me think they are the best.
My team is only there for the characters, and not the powers, Strange is weak in that game, but he is still in my party all the time, since I first got him.
Meh, suit yourself. However you want to play the game... 👆
Originally posted by DarkCrawlerYeah it does 😛
...no. SONY sucks, PS3 doesn't.
And just the way I see it Thor is one of the few guys who could solo through the game.
He has some cheap tricks that can be used most of the time to overcome any obstacle. Not saying he is the only one but I've gotten more time with Thor so I use him better than anyone else