Originally posted by EchuuCause the god of the bible killed innocent people including babies.
BingoCould you explain why He should be sent there too?
Originally posted by SoleranTrue, at least we can play strip poker with em.......
God's already there he is omnipresent🙂
Originally posted by leonheartmm😂
[B]if i had a choice{n if he existed} id like to think of him as a gentle cloud with no high thought processes
Well, going by what the bible says.... God is a physical being of immense power and foresight who has a soft spot for the downtrodden and anyone who loves him and is willing to do what he says.
The Hindus believe that There is a main god - Brahma, I think (been a while since I took that world religion class) - who is sleeping and all the other gods are part of his dream, in fact we are part of his dream. Apparently someday he'll wake up and everything will once again just be part of his consciousness. I'm not really fond of this idea as The end means we lose our individuality.
I think the Islamic Allah is similar to The Judeo-Christian God. I could be wrong, I didn't actually read the entire Q'oran, just a few Chapters.
Then there's this Hellenistic version of the Christian God that many seem to believe in; an essence that is everywhere and nowhere, omni-everything. There are of course some variants on this one. There's the God isn't involved in the affairs of men, God is nature(ie doesn't actually have a personality) These things are non-biblical, but have taken root in many Christian denominations.
My bet is with the first description I gave. (Of course it is only possible for one of the above to be correct, the only other possibility is that none of them are)
Originally posted by docb77
The Hindus believe that There is a main god - Brahma, I think (been a while since I took that world religion class) - who is sleeping and all the other gods are part of his dream, in fact we are part of his dream. Apparently someday he'll wake up and everything will once again just be part of his consciousness. I'm not really fond of this idea as The end means we lose our individuality.
The Dreamer-Dream metaphor is my favorite: it's simple, it's natural; and the lucid dreaming corollary is a bonus way for understanding what the beginning of "enlightenment" might mean.
As for losing one's individuality: this is a common misconception. The ego does not dissolve; all of reality does not become a featureless mush. Individuality is not eliminated; it simply sees itself for what it has been all along: a whole, a distinct entity, which is simply part of a greater whole. A cell does not cease to be a cell simply because it is part of a larger organism. If anything, the cell is empowered by its connections. Remove the cell from the whole, and it dies.
Originally posted by Mindship
The Dreamer-Dream metaphor is my favorite: it's simple, it's natural; and the lucid dreaming corollary is a bonus way for understanding what the beginning of "enlightenment" might mean.As for losing one's individuality: this is a common misconception. The ego does not dissolve; all of reality does not become a featureless mush. Individuality is not eliminated; it simply sees itself for what it has been all along: a whole, a distinct entity, which is simply part of a greater whole. A cell does not cease to be a cell simply because it is part of a larger organism. If anything, the cell is empowered by its connections. Remove the cell from the whole, and it dies.
Interesting analogy.