Originally posted by botankus😂 .......and you can those at IHOP.......
You need 1 man egg plus 1 Klendathan egg.
Originally posted by botankusAre you talking dirty to yourself too???.....god I'm glad I'm not alone.........lol..........I thought I was talking to you and lana.....
I hope it's me. 😕 After all, I'm all for a little self-lovin'.
That's only chickens and worms. Or there could be others, 😕 and that's usually females seeing as males are mutant females as said so in evolution. And it is true that females can become more male-like, but lets not even go there. Males can't become females. No man has changed into a woman, it's impossible.
Originally posted by lord xyz
That's only chickens and worms. Or there could be others, 😕 and that's usually females seeing as males are mutant females as said so in evolution. And it is true that females can become more male-like, but lets not even go there. Males can't become females. No man has changed into a woman, it's impossible.
But the fact that it can happen at all is proof of evolution.
Originally posted by lord xyz
Can anyone tell me the evidence for ID? What is it based on?
I believe in ID, but I believe in evolution also..
Read this...
PanspermiaThe first known mention of the idea was in the writings of the 5th century BCE Greek philosopher Anaxagoras, but panspermia theory was dormant until the nineteenth century when it was revived in modern form by several scientists, including Hermann von Helmholtz in 1879 and, somewhat later, by Svante Arrhenius in 1903. Panspermia can be said to be either interstellar (between star systems) or interplanetary (between planets in the same solar system). There is as yet no compelling evidence to support or contradict it, although the majority view holds that panspermia — especially in its interstellar form — is unlikely given the challenges of survival and transport in space.
Sir Fred Hoyle (1915–2001) and Chandra Wickramasinghe were important proponents of the hypothesis who further contended that lifeforms continue to enter the Earth's atmosphere, and may be responsible for epidemic outbreaks, new diseases, and the genetic novelty necessary for macroevolution.
Panspermia per se does not remove the need for life to originate somewhere, but does extend the time frame and environments available. Similarly it does not necessarily suggest that life originated only once and subsequently spread through the entire Universe, but instead that once started it may be able to spread to other environments suitable for replication. (In the strongest version of panspermia, life never originated, but always existed -- this axiom would require amending the big bang theory.) The mechanisms proposed for interstellar panspermia are hypothetical and currently unproven. Interplanetary transfer of material is well documented, as evidenced by meteorites of Martian origin found on Earth. However, claims that these carry evidence of extraterrestrial lifeforms — let alone viable dormant lifeforms — have either been proven unfounded as a result of terrestrial contamination, misinterpretation, or hoaxing; or are currently hotly disputed. Interestingly, space probes may also be a viable transport mechanism for interplanetary panspermia in our solar system (or even beyond) especially as terrestrial bacteria were shown to have survived in a dormant state on the Moon. Since then, however, NASA has implemented strict abiotic procedures to avoid planetary contamination.
Crick and others knew that Evolution could not prove nucleotides that make up DNA strands were not designed so he made up a knew theory to try to disprove teh existence of God.
Pretty smart guy..
Personally I believe that the wave duality of light when it passes through dimensions causes the sperm to interact with the cosmos and creates a never ending chaos...
That's how life began IMO...
the meltdown continues
Originally posted by PVS
for anyone just tuning in. teh smart guy and whob are the same person.
he actually created a fake forum member to argue with so that he could 'win'.its kinda like whacking off, except rather than climax at the end you get to see everyone point and laugh at you.
Originally posted by teh smart guyInteresting....though we all do start off as female then.......Oops!..........It would also go with some religious philosophies of yin/yang, god/goddess, wisdom/intellect, Kaballah, stoic...both traits in separate sexes to some degree,.......but that's off topic......found it interesting though.
I believe that all human beings are asexual but contain panspermia traits to evolve into the next dimension of human evolution.