I dont know. He's the first LB to be featured on the cover and he did hav an injury all ready. People seem to forget that all the other Madden cover Boys had no history of injuries. This would be George, Culpepper, Faulk and Vick. George actually didnt hav a injury during the 2000 season. It was actually in the Wild Card game against the Baltimore Ravens where he couldnt hold on to a pass, which ironically, Ray Lewis picked off. Lewis almost missed all of the 02' season. I think he will be the first player to stand up to this curse✅
Yeah, Pack gonna win it all, typical Packer fan who thinks Brett Farve is a god and the packers are their religion. Let's see, they have Ahman Green and that's about it. Favre is way over the hill, their secondary is much worse, they have no line, their linebackers are horrible. So where is it that they have anything resembling a super bowl team. Please explain.
wow, hmm lets see, they hav the second best O-Line in Football, they hav one of the best backup RB in Najeh Davenport and they may hav the best 3 WR combo in the NFL. No, Brett Favre is not a god. Actually i think they need to replace him next year with a seasoned veteran. I dont need to explain Ahman Green. His numbers speak for himself. When the Rams won the SuperBowl, no one was saying they were gunna win it in Preseason. By the way, wut team is gunna win it. I can find more flaws in that team then in the pack
Let's see how do they have the best 3 wr combo in the Nfl? Steelers have Burress, Ward, and Randle el; Cowboys have Johnson, Bryant, and Terry Glenn;Vikings have Moss, Cambell or Burleson, and Marcus Robinson; all of them are better than the packers' combo. Bills have Mcgahee and Travis Henry, Vikings have Bennett and Smith, Panthers have Foster and Stephan Davis, all are as good as the Green Davenport combo if not better. Vikings have a better o-line, so does Dallas, Tampa. I'd take Patriots, Panthers, or the Vikings to win it all. Green Bay won't even finish 2nd, Detroit will beat them out.
Originally posted by cal31hopefully ur still on KMC when everyone can tell u that u know nothing about football. The Packers worst reciever, Robert Ferguson is so much better than Keyshawn. He has no speed and every 3rd CB in the NFL can guard the guy. Oh and wtf are u talking about when u say Tampa has a better O-line. I can understand if u make an argument about the Lions maybe having a better line. Joey Harrington has only been sacked 12 times in the last 2 years. And really, the only way u know if an O-line is good is if the QB is protected and the RB gets 100 yard games all the time. Last year, Quincy Carter was rushed to throw those 21 INTs and Troy Hambrick barely got 1000 yards. I gotta agree with u on one thing, and thats the Vikings competing for the North. They revamped the D and the O will be there. The O-line is a *****😂 everyone is like 350 lbs. But then again, for a running team, they should of had more rushing yards as a team. Ya that D is gunna take the ball away from Favre and that O (or moss) is gunna burn the secondary every play just cus they cant cover Moss and if they triple cover the guy, there will be the biggest wholes in the Packers D anyone has ever seen. They will do the coverage and they need a QB spy. that means there is 7 more people. If only 3 rush, Culp will hav all the time in the world to do wutever he wants. if 4 rush, someone is gunna be wide open. They are the only team im worried about and thats with a terrible coach who runs it too much for his own good.
Let's see how do they have the best 3 wr combo in the Nfl? Steelers have Burress, Ward, and Randle el; Cowboys have Johnson, Bryant, and Terry Glenn;Vikings have Moss, Cambell or Burleson, and Marcus Robinson; all of them are better than the packers' combo. Bills have Mcgahee and Travis Henry, Vikings have Bennett and Smith, Panthers have Foster and Stephan Davis, all are as good as the Green Davenport combo if not better. Vikings have a better o-line, so does Dallas, Tampa. I'd take Patriots, Panthers, or the Vikings to win it all. Green Bay won't even finish 2nd, Detroit will beat them out.
Yeah they run it too much for their own good, that's why they have the best running game in the NFL. That must mean Keyshawn is very good if he can make the pro bowl without any speed, something Ferguson has never done. Hambrick wouldn't gain much more than he did with any other line because he isn't that good of running back, why do you think they signed Eddie George, because they thought the line would block better for him? No it's because he's a better back than Hambrick. Same with Carter, he's not a good quarterback at all, Vinny Testaverde is starting over him!!!! I don't know everything about football, I just follow it casually, but I do know that the Packers will not be that good of football team this year, 8-8 record at the best.
STEELERS REC. YDS. AVG. LNG. TD.
Hines Ward: 95 / 1163 / 12.2 / 50 / 10
Plaxico Burress: 60 / 860 / 14.3 / 47 / 4
Antwaan Randle EL: 37 / 364 / 9.8 / 32 / 1
COWBOYS
Terry Glenn: 52 / 754 / 14.5 / 51 / 5
Keyshawn Johnson: 45 / 600 / 13.3 / 39 / 3
Antonio Bryant: 39 / 550 / 14.1 /54 /2
VIKINGS
Randy Moss: 111 / 1632 / 14.7 / 72 / 17
Marcus Robinson: 31 / 451 / 14.5 / 50 /6
Kelly Campbell: 25 / 522 / 20.9 / 72 / 4
RAMS
Torry Holt 117 / 1696 / 14.5 /48 /12
Isaac Bruce 69 / 981 / 14.2 / 41 /5
Dane Looker 47 / 495 / 10.5 / 41 / 3
PACKERS
Javon Walker: 41 / 716 / 17.5 / 66 /9
Donald Driver: 52 / 621 / 11.9 /41 /2
Robert Ferguson: 38 / 520 / 13.7 / 47 /4
Hmmmmmm.... looking at those stats, I really wonder how the packers Wr combo is so much better, even though they have a better quarterback than all the rest of the teams I listed.
Looks like Prime Time is back.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=1870833