Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
The Ravens defense allow the Colts to gain too much yards. Allowing them to score field goals. For a defense that was second on the league in not allowing their opponents to gain yards...their performance does suck. I said that about the Colts because it's the truth...they didn't score any TD. The victory of the game is thanks to Vinny not Manning. Manning wasn't under pressure...yet he couldn't score a TD? I mean the game was terrible. The Colts gain to many rush yards and not a single TD.
But couldnt that be the reason because of how well the Raven's played defense.
Yards in a playoff game dont matter. It's the score. Even though the Ravens let yards on them, they still only kept Manning and Co to field goals. That's pretty damn good to me.
It's soooo funny about the Colts in the playoffs. First people complaing that Colts suck because all they do is score points, but not keep points off the board. So when the Colts actually play sound defense and WIN the game, (instead of losing), people complain that Manning sucks because he didnt score enough TD's. Who ****ing cares. The Colts won the game pretty handily and if it was against any other team, they would of scored TD's. But the Ravens defense played a pretty good game but not allowing the Colts to score on them and keeping the game close. It was the Ravens offense that let them down.
Isnt the mantra for the NFL playoffs is too play good run defense and good run offense, and if I'm not mistaken, many pundits said that the Colts were going to lose in the first round because they couldnt stop the run and relied to heavily on Manning. So now, your saying the Colts suck because they didnt score 30 points?