DN Kyp Durron and DN Kyle Katarn vs Darth Revan and Darth Traya

Started by Razielim3 pages

The technique on Malachor, she waved her hand and 9 Sith assasins (they were force sensitives, or not?) died.

Her super drain seemed totally different.

That, and her terrible weakness / X amount of minutes for mediation before the confrontation.

Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

Originally posted by tdtd
Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

Hmm, you may have actually for once made a valid point. I'll give this some thought.

My life is now complete.

Yeah, I see no reason why Traya couldn't instikill Kyp and Revan'd beat Kyle, so the Sith win. Even if the instikill doesn't work Traya could likely hold off Kyp until Revan took out Kyle, and then Revan and Traya together'd pwn Kyp.

Originally posted by tdtd
Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

The latter

Originally posted by tdtd
Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

The evidence has been presented. If you do not choose to believe it.. then lodge a complaint to Obsidian. It is a technique born of the darkside, that Kreia has shown in two occasions, one in the prescence and one away from the Exile.

🙄

Actually, no evidence has been presented, my argument has yet to refuted, learn how to read before throwing around your KOTOR Bias.

Evidence. Hardly.

All you have backing up your arguments is mindless speculation. Speculation does not amount to proof. Get it through your thick skull.

On the otherhand I have provided proof in the form of IN GAME evidence. Yet you continue with mindless speculation that any real debater would treat with a grain of salt.

Keep it up buddy.

Actually my speculation is what we call logical, don't get so defensive fanboy. Just because my logical speculation successfully diminishes your character/s doesn't mean I'm speaking from mindless speculation. You haven't provided any proof, especially with your wonderful non canon gameplay. Read this again, since this makes sense to everybody else but you..

Originally posted by tdtd
Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

Originally posted by tdtd
Actually my speculation is what we call logical, don't get so defensive fanboy. Just because my logical speculation successfully diminishes your character/s doesn't mean I'm speaking from mindless speculation. You haven't provided any proof, especially with your wonderful non canon gameplay. Read this again, since this makes sense to everybody else but you..

Non-Canon gameplay. How is DOCUMENTED gameplay non-canon? Then you would be stating something like Revan did not kill Malak, or Kyle did not kill Dessaan.

It was an in game cutscene, just as canon as Traya killing the three Jedi masters. Stay in denial if you can't accept the proof. All you are basing your arguments on is speculation. Again, no debater is going to take you seriously if all you are going on is speculation, and denying supported evidence from the opposition.

Once again, my quote is a very logical assumption, and you are the only one that's having trouble comprehending it, so I will post it once more for the reading impaired..

Originally posted by tdtd
Oh so you're saying that Nihilus developed the technique as a result of a wound in the force, the Exile developed the technique as a result from the wound in the force, yet Traya figured it out all by herself.. Pass what you're smoking.

Then Tdtd, explain how she drained all those apprentices of Sion at Malachor 5? I will be waiting for your reply.

What are you retarded? How many times do I have to post my quote. She tied her life to the exile, so in essence whatever powers the Exile has, she has. Of course she learned to control it which I give her props for, while the Exile just drains everybody randomly. It's moronic to think that Traya learned the technique, while all the evidence points towards my quote.

Does it say that the attack requires being a wound in the force?

Does it say that Traya needed X, X, and X prerequisites to pull it off? No.

You can't assume that Traya's attack will simply work without cooldown in the heat of battle against an equally (if not greater) skilled opponent. Because the assumption doesn't go both ways, we don't pass that off in a debate. The same way we don't say Nomi strips people of the force or Sadow simply blows their heads off.

At the same time Illustrious... Nihilus had the technique on the greater scale as a wound, the Exile had it as a wound, and Traya had no evidence of having it before tying her life to the exile, so it is just an assumption, albeit a logical one. Unless of course you consider the other two incompetent and Kreia a genius.

Yet you can't prove that Kreia didn't have it earlier, your providing us with nothing but speculation, so before your so stubbornly listen to your one sided logic, consider the entire situation.

What? So Kreia somehow used the Exile to drain all the Sith Apprentices of Sion at Malachor? Somehow when the Exile was still a fair few planets away?

tdtd, your prone to use one sided logic and pure speculation, just as you tried to downplay Kun's Amulet.

Why would I have to prove a negative? Just like GV, instead of trying to add your logic, you spend your whole time trying to disprove mine, which is logical speculation. Why don't you PROVE that Kreia could use the ability without the life bond. I have provided a logical argument, while you are throwing out nonsense. Yes Deception, the Exile and Nihilus could use the power because of the wound, but Kriea oh no, Kreia learned that.. Yea, very logical. I think I'll stick with my logical assumpton and wait til someone with half a brain offers an argument and stops wasting his time trying to disprove mine. And apparently you can't comprehend the concept of a life bond.. Yes, the exile DOESNT have to be right next to her for her to do her instakill, she ganed his powers through the life bond. Speculation, yes.. Logical, yes.. Anything to refute it? No. And mentioning Kun is irrelevant misdirection.. Thanks.

Originally posted by tdtd
Why would I have to prove a negative? Just like GV, instead of trying to add your logic, you spend your whole time trying to disprove mine, which is logical speculation. Why don't you PROVE that Kreia could use the ability without the life bond. I have provided a logical argument, while you are throwing out nonsense. Yes Deception, the Exile and Nihilus could use the power because of the wound, but Kriea oh no, Kreia learned that.. Yea, very logical. I think I'll stick with my logical assumpton and wait til someone with half a brain offers an argument and stops wasting his time trying to disprove mine. And apparently you can't comprehend the concept of a life bond.. Yes, the exile DOESNT have to be right next to her for her to do her instakill, she ganed his powers through the life bond. Speculation, yes.. Logical, yes.. Anything to refute it? No. And mentioning Kun is irrelevant misdirection.. Thanks.