Originally posted by Lana
Not in the US it's not.
It's called statutory rape, not rape. It has a different name because it has different circumstances and judgements aren't always as severe as full on forced rape.
The only reason they class it as rape is because, as you said, she can't legally give consent. If she wanted to have sex and wasn't forced or harmed, that is taken into account at all times.
-AC
Originally posted by Raven Guardia
well society just likes to complain in general. if women dressed as nuns we complain we want freedom to dress as we wish. if people dress sleazy we complain again.
And, once again, this all falls back on a double standard. The issue of dress ethic is just as flammable as the Pro-War/Anti-War crowds.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's called statutory rape, not rape. It has a different name because it has different circumstances and judgements aren't always as severe as full on forced rape.The only reason they class it as rape is because, as you said, she can't legally give consent. If she wanted to have sex and wasn't forced or harmed, that is taken into account at all times.
-AC
I like to watch you argue.
Originally posted by Captain REX
I somewhat agree with the thread. A girl can be sexy without having to show off everything in public with as little clothing fabric as possible. I have friends that don't dress slutty and I find them extremely sexy.There's a difference between sexy and slutty, too...slutty is just gross.
SHHHH!!! Don't tell them that!
He's lying everyone! Go on, continue walking around with low cut tops and miniskirts showing your thongs, it's the only way people will like you! That's right.
Originally posted by Takion
Ok, Im sick and tired of this, i hate it how girls now days have skimpy clothes and walk around like prostitutes, WTF are there parents doing. Boys are just becoming dumber, and they are having awful thoughts, WHOS WITH ME!