Ludo Kressh vs DN Luke

Started by Deception5 pages

Ludo Kressh vs DN Luke

Who wins?

Personally i believe that this a very close fight with Ludo taking it at the end.

I agree very close fight.. As powerful as DN Luke is I don't think he can fully contend with an ancient sith.

Againt Ludo? He stands a good chance.

I know he does, but he most likely will not win, at least more often than not.. An Ancient Sith is an Ancient Sith.

Against Ludo? Luke destroys him. Luke's already proven adept at fighting their tools and he's only gotten a helluva lot stronger since then

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Against Ludo? Luke destroys him. Luke's already proven adept at fighting their tools and he's only gotten a helluva lot stronger since then

Yea, he's proven he was able to fight powerful ancient sith.. Do me a favor and don't post again lightsnake, youre sucking all the enjoyment out of logical arguments.

He's taken on their devices and Luke's pretty much the strongest force of light that's ever existed in the galaxy.

Here we go with unwarranted hyperbole. How does that entail his defeat of an ancient sith? OH wait, it doesn't... Thanks for playing.

and how does that entail Ludo's defeat of Luke? Wait, it doesn't, you're arguing with the facts and providing nothing of your own, thanks for playing. Good night

Embarassing yourself with illogical arguments doesn't suit well for an outcast Lightsnake, so stop posting because each post is more ridiculous than the previous. The Ancient sith were the most powerful, this is fact. You can cry and ***** all you want with hyperbole but the fact remains their power was unrivaled.

Ok, show me exactly where it says it. The exact, Lucas-said, undebateable quote saying "The Ancient Sith empire was much stronger than any other force group that ever existed."

LOL! This is why youre a horrible debater. You lose an argument then you beg for an exact quote that doesn't exist, nor diminishes my argument. THat's like saying "Show me where it says Palpatine can defeat Marka Ragnos". Sound stupid? Welcome to your argument.

Ah, so the quote doesn't exist? Very interesting

Actually no because it doesn't do anything to the argument and makes you look competely retarded with your illogical nonsense.. Mission accomplished Lightsnake...

You completely miss the point tdtd. Until there is an exact quote saying that 'The Ancient Sith empire was much stronger than any other force group that ever existed', it is only your opinion and not a fact.

Exactly, and Tdtd you are arguing out of anger and throwing out pathetic insults at LightSnake, when you yourself cant prove why the Ancients were so much more powerful then anyone that ever existed. Luke studied the dark arts. He knows about the powers of the dark side, so he knows his enemy well.

That's a good point.

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
Exactly, and Tdtd you are arguing out of anger and throwing out pathetic insults at LightSnake, when you yourself cant prove why the Ancients were so much more powerful then anyone that ever existed. Luke studied the dark arts. He knows about the powers of the dark side, so he knows his enemy well.

Actually no, I'm not angry, but this forum produces a bunch of noobs in the morning so I have to deal with the stupidity. You don't NEED a quote to find out who's better than who, otherwise this forum would be pointless, and so would the entire star wars universe, so your point is ridiculous. I'll use my other example, you don't need a quote saying Michael Jordan is better than Lebron for it to be true, that's just ridiculous. I know Luke studied the dark side but what does that say about him facing someone who lived in the pinnacle of dark side power? Aboslutely nothing bro, you two need to use logic, not ridiculous arguments that have no merit.

Well it's completely obvious that Jordan is a better player then james. However Sadow is pretty close to Sidious and Luke, so it's a matter of opinion.

Sadow is CLOSE to Sidious? Sadow is above Sidious, unless of course youre saying Sidious>Kun, and Sidious>Nadd, and you'd be factually wrong.