The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Jen'ari3,287 pages

Uh, sorry, but I totally have The Touch™. 😐

No, you really don't.

I really do. I used it to own your sorry ass in the Kyle Katarn thread.

No. You don't have The Touchâ„¢. If you were constantly good debater, you might. But, you're not. You're not even good. And how did you "own my ass" when your words conceded exactly to what I was relaying?

lmao. Yousa gonna die!

Originally posted by Advent
No. You don't have [b]The Touchâ„¢. If you were constantly good debater, you might. But, you're not. You're not even good. And how did you "own my ass" when your words conceded exactly to what I was relaying? [/B]

Maybe if I constantly put in as much effort as I do on my good days, I would. The fact is, I've beaten you twice now. Losing your touch huh? Unlucky about that 😆 .

Losing my touch? Yes, because some kid declares it - it must be so! And you didn't beat me twice. The Sylvar thread? Lmfao. You just claimed "oh Motoko, you lose. I win". And you said also didn't establish jack shit to put Sylvar above even Tott Donetta. You just said "blocking starfire is good, but killing primitive massassi is soooooo much better". So, what was that again?

Originally posted by Advent
Losing my touch? Yes, because some kid declares it - it must be so! And you didn't beat me twice. The Sylvar thread? Lmfao. You just claimed "oh Motoko, you lose. I win".

Ha, you remember. I pwned you.

Originally posted by Jen'ari
Ha, you remember. I pwned you.

No, you didn't. Anyone can read the thread, and see what ridiculous crap you came up with. Even if you think you beat me somehow (*hint* you didn't) - it doesn't mean you're better than me (*hint* you're not). In any case, Crado ring a bell? Or does Odan Urr ring a bell? Or does "Prime of the Jedi", "l0l lucas looks tired" ring a bell?

I came up with ridiculous crap? lmao, wasn't it you who stated that Sylvar sucked because 'all it took was a flick of the wrist from Exar Kun to take her down'? By that logic, ROTS Sidious sucked because 'all it took was a flick of the wrist from [Yoda] (who is generally considered weaker than Yoda) to take [him] down', correct?

That analogy doesn't work because Sylvar is described as "of no consequence" to Exar Kun by the omniscient narrator. Sidious can cause problems for Yoda as we saw in ROTS. So, "by that logic" - nothing. At least not that analogy.

Originally posted by Advent
That analogy doesn't work because Sylvar is described as "of no consequence" to Exar Kun by the omniscient narrator. Sidious can cause problems for Yoda as we saw in ROTS. So, "by that logic" - nothing. At least not that analogy.

I don't even see why I have to reply to this. Strawman, much? Your argument was that she must suck because Kun was able to take her out with a flick of his wrist. If you choose to go by that logic, then you have to accept that ROTS Sidious sucks because Yoda (who is weaker than Kun) was able to take him out with a flick of the wrist.

Originally posted by Jen'ari
I don't even see why I have to reply to this. Strawman, much? Your argument was that she must suck because Kun was able to take her out with a flick of his wrist. If you choose to go by that logic, then you have to accept that ROTS Sidious sucks because Yoda (who is weaker than Kun) was able to take him out with a flick of the wrist.

There's actually a difference. You are using not only a false analogy, but also a strawman argument. My entire argument was not based solely the fact she was owned by Exar Kun. Part of your argument was based off the claim that her killing two Massassi was more impressive than blocking blaster fire from two starships. So, in essence, you're argument was relying on the fact you deemed Sylvar's feats more impressive (and of course you would).

Anyways, Sidious is a "consequence" to Yoda. Sylvar is described as "of no consequence", ergo there's a difference between Yoda doing it to Sidious, and Sylvar getting owned because Sylvar doesn't have a chance. I'll admit that was somewhat absurd assertion, however, it doesn't change the fact Yoda and Sidious have different relationship than Exar and Sylvar.

'My entire argument was not based solely the fact she was owned by Exar Kun.'

You indicated and made clear that you believed she sucked only because all it took from Kun was a flick of his wrist to take her down, not that she sucked because all it took form Kun to bring her down was a flick of the wrist among other things, or anything of that nature to indicate that you were not only basing the fact that she sucked off of that one fact.

'Anyways, Sidious is a "consequence" to Yoda. Sylvar is described as "of no consequence", ergo there's a difference between Yoda doing it to Sidious, and Sylvar getting owned because Sylvar doesn't have a chance. I'll admit that was somewhat absurd assertion, however, it doesn't change the fact Yoda and Sidious have different relationship than Exar and Sylvar.'

All that doesn't matter Advent. You made the statement indicating that you believed that she sucked because Exar Kun was able to take her out with a flick of his wrist. Whether she was of consequence or not is irrelevant, that was your original argument.

Originally posted by Advent
Coupled along with the various facts that she's nothing special.

^
Oh, really? So, if I was basing it off just one thing. What's that then? When I say that she "sucked", I mean on the grand scale. She was hardly more powerful than Tott Donetta. And I also used Tott Donetta' feat to base an argument that she is, indeed, nothing special. Just like Tott, Cay, and the rest of the crew. So, hardly one thing, Nebaris.

POT PIE!!! 💃

Advent, Je'nari, this is NOT the thread for this, take it to PM's, or make your own thread about it.

Go fall off a balcony.

*Inhales*

Already did this mornin'

I see things are still as dull as ever around here...

*sigh* what ever happened to good old days when the vs forum was first formed?