Borbarad
Advocatus Diaboli
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
But that proves the point. If it's well documented, that's good, I agree. But it's also common knowledge (outside of the Middle East) what happened. So what's the exact purpose of studying just the Holocaust? That's like studying just the Honda Civic. I mean, what's my major? Honda Civics?
The point about studying history is not to get a broad overview on all topics concerning history, but to learn some basics in all "timeframes" and methods to get yourself new knowledge. That's why historians usually are experts in one field of history, but don't have much more than an "overview" on the other fields.
A history class which focuses on important, timeless human themes like genocide, imperialism, colonialism, and globalization would be a relevant one to enhance one's knowledge and critical thinking.
There are such classes. But usually, even those use one specific main topic as focal point and link to other topics from there. I, for example, once took a class about the Polis in Ancient Greek - just to write a 12 page thesis paper about the Battle at Thermopylae in said class, because it was dealing with "Ancient Greek" in general - but with a focus on Athen.
A history class on just one aspect of these themes is likely to be too narrow. I mean, here I can save you a couple thousand dollars:
- Holocaust Wiki page
This actually includes the answer why to focus a class on the Holocaust:
"Each case is specific as a threshold phenomenon, while each also adds its unique memory as signposts along an incremental continuum of horror."
😉