Originally posted by Nai
Denying a challenge he brought up and instead dismissing him with an explanation why his entire reasoning is based upon a logical fallacy is called "debating" now? Gosh. And then, I've always thought, that a "debate" would consist of exchanging arguments in order to either express ones own opinion or attempt to convice the opposition of that specific view.
That you rejected a larger debate, and refused to debate him fully on his terms, doesn't mean that you didn't engage him in any kind of debate whatsoever. You did briefly exchange arguments with him, and were soundly defeated. You saw that quanchi came here on a mission, he called out the forum's best debaters and analysed absolutely every argument we could possibly present him with and formed counters to all of them. It's absolutely understandable that you fear him, and rightly so, and wanted to stay the hell away from any kind of argument with him.