"Though Yoda is a tough combatant, the Emperor uses his Sith powers to release lightning bolts and hurl floating platforms at his foe. Ultimately the battle proves too much for Yoda, who barely escapes and is whisked away to safety by Senator Bail Organa."
-Ultimate Star Wars
Quanchi is right, Sidious > Yoda. What now? 😱
Originally posted by psmith81992
Yes he is my idol. And yes, the Blacklist is the best show on TV, single-handedly carried by the great James Spader. And that was probably my favorite episode.
I agree with everything said there. Spader in killer-mode is probably the most entertaining thing on TV.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You need to use your noggin for something other than slamming it on the door because girls keep rejecting you.
Fortunately, I have your sorry persona as a substitute. And while I'm not even sure you know what female specimens of the human kind look like, I think you know, that you're just an insufficient replacement.
I'm right. Sidious won. Yoda fell and fled with his life. Sucks to be Yoda.I'm right.
Sidious did merely benefit from his greater weight, which allowed him not to be tossed around by the Force explosion between the Jedi and the Sith. On equal ground, he was trying to run from Yoda first (but even failed there). And, if I may remind you, ultimately, Yoda won.
I also find it quite funny, that Yoda running counts as victory for Sidious, while Dooku running doesn't count as victory for Yoda. Apparently, you're still inable to produce two arguments without having to resort to double-standards.
You like to posture but have always backed down to me. Continue to be humbled while flaming. I can send you a link if your mini brain wants to challenge my Maximus brain.
With all due respect, quanchi. I don't enter fights with people that don't know when they have lost. You will - as always - have your "reasoning" picked apart in the matter of minutes, just to repeat it ad nauseam and declare yourself the winner, when the opposition can't be bothered to continue. So where is the point?
Originally posted by NaiOk, let's discuss the details. Dooku did technically flee but he was neither disarmed nor injured in anyway. Initially Yoda was temp ko'd by Palpatine which he recovered. But Palpatine had better positioning on the pod. He had the higher ground and as soon as Yoda got onto the pod he used lightning. The context is entirely different but the difference is Dooku was clearly inferior to Yoda. The fact Yoda was unable to best him in the time he had makes him look bad.
I agree with everything said there. Spader in killer-mode is probably the most entertaining thing on TV.Fortunately, I have your sorry persona as a substitute. And while I'm not even sure you know what female specimens of the human kind look like, I think you know, that you're just an insufficient replacement.
Sidious did merely benefit from his greater weight, which allowed him not to be tossed around by the Force explosion between the Jedi and the Sith. On equal ground, he was trying to run from Yoda first (but even failed there). And, if I may remind you, ultimately, Yoda won.
I also find it quite funny, that Yoda running counts as victory for Sidious, while Dooku running doesn't count as victory for Yoda. Apparently, you're still inable to produce two arguments without having to resort to double-standards.
With all due respect, quanchi. I don't enter fights with people that don't know when they have lost. You will - as always - have your "reasoning" picked apart in the matter of minutes, just to repeat it ad nauseam and declare yourself the winner, when the opposition can't be bothered to continue. So where is the point?
You don't enter fights. The only thing you repeatedly do is assure everyone of why you're not entering a debate with me repping Khan. The evidence backs me up just as clearly as someone like Cad Bane beating Obi Wan in the clone wars series.
(no autoplay, i think)
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, let's discuss the details.
🙄
You don't enter fights.
I'm quite sure, that pretty much everybody here is willing to happily disagree with that statement in regards to my person.
The only thing you repeatedly do is assure everyone of why you're not entering a debate with me repping Khan.
Exactly. Was that meant as critique or did you just want to state the obvious?
The evidence backs me up just as clearly as someone like Cad Bane beating Obi Wan in the clone wars series.
Oh. I'm sure it does. The Quanchiverse is filled with evidence supporting the Quanchipinion. But I'm still no part of it. And that you can't get the idea into your head, that Khan will be completely destroyed by any force user willing to utilize offensive force powers against him, already reveals the skewed "logic" your opinion is based on. So why should I bother to enter a debate with you? Still no answer...