Originally posted by Fated XtasyNone of those actors would fit Ezio tbh.
lmao coded message my ass.Tbh i kinda wanna see it but i kinda don't
The only way I'd see it is if RDJ played Ezio.
Hmm or maybe johnny depp would be better.
Joker we must convene on this
I don't know who would, but I know he'd have to be an 11/10
Johhny Depp is 52. Look-wise he could pull off Revelations Ezio. But try getting him to stop acting like... well Johnny Depp, and also doing a believable Italian accent... eek.
Don't go for the A-listers, find someone younger and more obscure. Alot of hidden talent can be found with big breakout roles like that, and you don't get distracted by the too-famous face.
Sorry for missing the earlier "Are Nazis left"-debate. Here's some input:
Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Here's a simple breakdown.https://www.quora.com/Why-are-Nazis-considered-to-be-right-wing-parties
NG, I only had to read the first sentence of your college student link to gauge this guy's left leanings+whatever confirmation bias his essay is. Screaming about Fox News and the Tea Party isn't how you start a convincing essay, it's what you do after you put your tin foil hat on.
Here are two links from credible sources, not someone who just completed his intro to art history final.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/372197/nazis-still-socialists-jonah-goldberg
http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/oct/16/jason-villalba/jason-villalba-said-bernie-sanders-democratic-soci/
The notion of labeling the Nazis "socialists" is just ridiculous, and is mainly based upon differenting uses of the word "socialism". To sum it up real quickly, why this doesn't work:
- Hitler and his NSDAP did always support the idea of private property
- they supported the (liberal) idea of competition, although mainly out of social-darwinistic considerations.
- they have never developed a consistant economical theory. The only thing that was clear, was that the economy had to subject itself under the primacy of politics. But never with the idea of socializing the it.
The social historian Wehler once wrote, that the only "socialistic" thing in national socialism - although in a rather twisted sense - was the notion of a "people's community". But Marx and Engels didn't write "Aryan workers of Germany, unite!" into their Communist Manifesto.
And its even more laughable to call Nazis "left" in terms of political "sides". Racism, antisemitism, nationalism and authoritarian laws usually aren't "left". Although I have to admit that there are some overlaps between "right" and "left" when it comes to ideological extremists.
The notion of labeling the Nazis "socialists" is just ridiculous, and is mainly based upon differenting uses of the word "socialism". To sum it up real quickly, why this doesn't work:- Hitler and his NSDAP did always support the idea of private property
- they supported the (liberal) idea of competition, although mainly out of social-darwinistic considerations.
- they have never developed a consistant economical theory. The only thing that was clear, was that the economy had to subject itself under the primacy of politics. But never with the idea of socializing the it.
And its even more laughable to call Nazis "left" in terms of political "sides". Racism, antisemitism, nationalism and authoritarian laws usually aren't "left". Although I have to admit that there are some overlaps between "right" and "left" when it comes to ideological extremists.