Yeah, I know obviously. I was just joking, lmao.
But honestly, why rank Bill that high at all then? Why does it only stop at MJ? I find it hard to believe Russell would have brought the Lakers 3 championships like Shaq did had he'd been in Oneal's shoes because of his lack of offense. Unless --- of course --- Kobe stepped up and took the helm offensively. I'm not sure a rich man's Dwight Howard would be as good as a Shaq in this day and age.
These guys kept saying Lebron's best finals numbers are better than MJ's but that's literally false. I mean they're either intentionally lying or making up stuff. IF you compare their numbers, Jordan's best trumps Lebron's best. Not to mention, Lebron will always have the 2011 meltdown on his resume, while Jordan was 6-6 with 6 MVPS. One can argue that Lebron is a more complete player but that's only because Jordan didn't have to be and when he did, he was as complete as Lebron was.
Yes he was. Lebron had a better finals last year. Everyone keeps pointing to the warriors' regular season record, conveniently ignoring the fact that they looked like nothing like their regular season selves. Jordan's 91 finals, 93 finals, flu game, 63 points in the garden, were all better than lebrons best.
Lebron did not have a better Finals last year, at all. He played way more minutes last year and was infinitely less efficient. Sure, there's a reason for that, but that's kind of beside the point. Plus Lebron actually won against a better Warriors team. And '91 Jordan is the absolute peak of basketball itself.