The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Originally posted by Publius II
stop trolling plz

I'm still really confused as to how he defines "trolling." I mean, considering he was temp-banned for it once and permabanned three times, both here and at EoD on both of his socks, he should know better than anyone.

This would really make sense, if your claims were factual.
LS, taking logs is irrelevant seeing as how I don't have anything relating to you other than AintGotNoHoes

So lets recap this little episode of the real world on KMC

:::Faunus offers some evidence that at best shows some kind of coincidence::::
Me: Ok Faunus great but what about all of the other stuff that doesn't even link me to "tdtd"?
Faunus: silence
Me: No really Faunus, what about everything else?
Faunus: I don't know but you're still a sock!

Great job Faunus. I expect more from an older person, but this is equally hilarious.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
So lets recap this little episode of the real world on KMC

:::Faunus offers some evidence that at best shows some kind of coincidence::::

Me: Ok Faunus great but what about all of the other stuff that doesn't even link me to "tdtd"?

You
....? I don't have an aim "dave111283". I didn't take a look at the profiles because it would consume the time I could be laughing at your obsessive stupidity.

[...]

No, I'm 25. But great math.

Faunus: silence
Me: No really Faunus, what about everything else?
Faunus: I don't know but you're still a sock!

Great job Faunus. I expect more from an older person, but this is equally hilarious.

Originally posted by Publius II
I'm going to laugh a lot when I get you banned, bud. You're only safe for now because you're unintentionally amusing.

That was a very poorly disguised attempt at discerning my age.

I tell you what. The only person I talk to from KMC is Escape. I maintain I am who I say I am regardless your repeated failed attempts at "exposing me". If escape doesn't back me up, then you can count this as a victory. If he happens to back me up, then will you stfu and stop obsessing because it's making you look bad? I haven't even brought this up to him but he would have most authority on who I claim I am, not you, with your "facts".

Rofl. Do you really think you're going to fool anyone?

But sure, if it makes you happy, go get Gideon. I'm sure he doesn't want to get pulled into this - if he did, he probably would've already posted - but yeah, go ahead.

Originally posted by Publius II
Rofl. Do you really think you're going to fool anyone?

But sure, if it makes you happy, go get Gideon. I'm sure he doesn't want to get pulled into this - if he did, he probably would've already posted - but yeah, go ahead.

I'm not going to go get him, if he wants to post here that's fine. Fool anyone? Seeing as how you have some evidence that suggests a coincidence, and that you conveniently omit the evidence that suggests that I am who I say I am, I find your "confidence" hilarious.

Originally posted by Publius II
Clear enough for you?

It wasn't random; it was the worst one yet. If it makes you feel better, I will consistently respond to each and every one of your on-topic posts from here on out.

I read the entire thing.

See the above.

Point out another, then establish that others - whom you notably aren't accusing of trolling - weren't doing the same. When you fail at that, I'll laugh at the double standard.

Again; you know the policy. Report me, or ignore me. Otherwise, stop bitching.

KMC Profile: Darth Sexy
KMC Profile: tdtd
EoD Profile: Dave
EoD Profile: David

tdtd banned on: July 12, 2006.
Darth Sexy registration date: July 12, 2006.

tdtd IM: Dave111283
tdtd EoD username: Dave
Darth Sexy EoD username: David

[b]Dave [tdtd], in reponse to this thread at EoD:[Does anyone really need me to quote DS mentioning UT or the LSATs?]

Darth Sexy's profile: And taking a look at David's profile (linked above), we see that his age was 25 as of the banning last year. Didn't you just turn 26?

And just for kicks, from tdtd's profile😖o basically, your story is that two Jewish* college students attending UT who had previously attended college in Florida and planned on taking the LSATs "[last] December" both hit up the exact same two forums around the same time; you joined the same day the other one was banned from here for trolling. Meanwhile, the first Jewish Texan was hanging out at EoD, which you joined several months after he was banned [for trolling again, in the eyes of those admins]. You also share a very similar writing style [I urge those of you reading this who are actually unconvinced to take a peek].

If you're really a different person, I swear to Godpromise I'll convert.

From David's introductory post at EoD. [/B]

Holy socks, Batman!

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
I'm not going to go get him, if he wants to post here that's fine.

You
If escape doesn't back me up, then you can count this as a victory. If he happens to back me up, then will you stfu and stop obsessing because it's making you look bad?

Just so we're clear.

Fool anyone? Seeing as how you have some evidence that suggests a coincidence, and that you conveniently omit the evidence that suggests that I am who I say I am, I find your "confidence" hilarious.

a.) You say you never planned to visit Yeshiva.
b.) tdtd went to school in Florida (where you as David said you planned to start up a business).
c.) Your ages supposedly don't match exactly (they're still very close).
d.) You claim you never had the IM I posted (which LS contests).

Versus... everything else.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
Holy socks, Batman!

Originally posted by Publius II
[B]You probably have no idea what you just did, so I'll clarify: under your own terms you've said that if Escape doesn't voluntarily speak out against the idea of you being tdtd's sock, I win.

Just so we're clear.

The only possibly contradictory "evidence" is as follows:

a.) You say you never planned to visit Yeshiva.
b.) tdtd went to school in Florida (where you as David said you planned to start up a business).
c.) Your ages supposedly don't match exactly (they're still very close).
d.) You claim you never had the IM I posted (which LS contests).

I was waiting for when you were going to have one of your pseudo intellectuals from EOD back you up. What's the matter faunus, confidence shaken?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Doesn't back me up. As in posts and doesn't back me up. If he chooses not to post, oh well.

For someone trying to get into law school, you sure suck at detecting loopholes.

Just so we're clear.

The only possibly contradictory "evidence" is as follows:

a. correct. prove otherwise.
b. I never went to school in Florida. I went to UT. Try again.
c. Holy shit, what a coincidence.
d. Let LS prove it but I maintain the ONLY aim I've ever talked to him was on the one aim I mentioned. So let me reiterate the fact that all you have is SOME coincidental evidence. Nothing more.

I was waiting for when you were going to have one of your pseudo intellectuals from EOD back you up. What's the matter faunus, confidence shaken?

You have really got to get a handle on that quote function. It'd suck to still be a complete failure at that when you get shipped out.

Originally posted by Publius II
If he doesn't post, he isn't backing you up.

For someone trying to get into law school, you sure suck at detecting loopholes.

You have really got to get a handle on that quote function. It'd suck to still be a complete failure at that when you get shipped out.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Really? If he doesn't post then he isn't backing me up, nor is he accusing me of anything, he just either doesn't care or doesn't want to get involved, therefore as I've stated, "oh well".

"If escape doesn't back me up, then you can count this as a victory. If he happens to back me up, then will you stfu and stop obsessing because it's making you look bad?"

If he isn't backing you up here, I win. Only if he "happens to back [you] up" am I supposed to "stfu."

And I'm great at detecting loopholes. I've detected plenty of yours, with your "solid" case and "overwhelming" evidence.

And those aren't "loopholes" smartass. Seriously, were the 95% of LSAT testers you scored better than in junior high?

Shucks Faunus, are you really going to continue lying to yourself? I know humility isn't one of your strong suits, nor is common sense, but damn, you're pushing this one. So when rex finds out that your 'evidence' is nothing more than some coincidence

and the rest speculation(which you like to pass off as fact), are you going to throw a temper tantrum here? Or are you going to get your tool internet friends to back you up here?

Or are you going to ***** and moan back at EOD?

Keep talking though. Laughter's supposed to help longevity.

Originally posted by Publius II
You were pretty explicit before. Need I post it again?

"[b]If escape doesn't back me up, then you can count this as a victory. If he happens to back me up, then will you stfu and stop obsessing because it's making you look bad?"

If he isn't backing you up here, I win. Only if he "happens to back [you] up" am I supposed to "stfu."

And those aren't "loopholes" smartass. Seriously, were the 95% of LSAT testers you scored better than in junior high?

🙄

Tools? Like Red Nemesis and Lightsnake?

Keep talking though. Laughter's supposed to help longevity. [/B]

Uh huh.

What branch of law are you trying to get into, anyway?

Originally posted by Publius II
Uh huh.

What branch of law are you trying to get into, anyway?

It depends. I have a long ways to go in terms of logic and understanding certain things. If I go to law school, hopefully a lot of that will be dealt with. Right now I'm just trying to get caught up with people my age.

Most lawyers i know tell me i have the mind of one, but I sometimes have trouble connecting the dots and that's fine, I'm trying to fix that the proper way this time around but it gets harder when you get older.

Wait. I never intended for this to get civil.

Call me a troll or something; I thrive on conflict.

Originally posted by Publius II
Wait. I never intended for this to get civil.

Call me a troll or something; I thrive on conflict.

Hey you asked and I gave you an honest answer. No reason to lie.

[conflict]Yeah. It's not like you've been doing that for two and a half years now.[/conflict]

But seriously, you're not leaning one way or another? I have a cousin in corporations law doing mergers and such who just moved to real estate. It pays well (his first job at 24 paid 140k), and it's apparently a hell of a lot less stress than, say, criminal justice (obviously).

Originally posted by Publius II
[conflict]Yeah. It's not like you've been doing that for two and a half years now.[/conflict]

But seriously, you're not leaning one way or another? I have a cousin in corporations law doing mergers and such who just moved to real estate. It pays well (his first job at 24 paid 140k), and it's apparently a hell of a lot less stress than, say, criminal justice (obviously).

It's not about the money for me though. Plenty of my friends are lawyers in M&A but do you HONESTLY think I can succeed in something like specific detailed paper pushing? I would fail miserably at anything resembling pushing paper, not to mention it's boring. For me, I would want to work as a prosecutor in the DA's office and maybe one day become a defense attorney. The problem is, I don't believe in 99% of the justifications defense attorneys present for their cases, so how could I expect to be a good defense attorney if I find that it's bullshit. At the same time, there is overzealous prosecuting running rampant across this country, and I was a victim to it once. However, to me the most intellectually stimulating part of law is litigation. Like I said, prosecutor is the way I'd go although the money sucks. Really, my dream is to go federal because that's where all the best action is, but they also hire the best of the best, and if you go to anything below a top tier school, top 5% or not, you won't get hired with all the competition.

You're right though, the paper pushing lawyer jobs are a lot less stressful, and a lot more boring. I'm not the accountant type, nor the detail oriented, although I would need it for litigation. I would prefer criminal justice because it demands more from me, it is ridiculously intellectually stimulating, and I think it's the best chance to reach my potential.