The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Darth Sexy3,287 pages

The fact that you conveniently ignored the overwhelming majority of my post is firm evidence of it.

Nope, I just didn't feel the need to respond to it.

Funny that you mentioned, oh, none of that in your last post, which is why I didn't bring any of it up.

That's the problem. If you bothered to read the debate between Crimzon and I in detail, rather than find the shortest post and critisize it, you would have seen that as being the main argument. Since you didn't even know this was the issue, I can only assume that your reading comprehension skills are sorely lacking, or you didn't bother to read the actual debate, thereby justifying me calling you a troll.

People who live in poverty because of circumstances that are beyond their control deserve aid.

Are you daft? When have I ever argued against this?

I was refuting your absurdly flawed post, not making a particular case for my own stance. Do you have a problem with that?

Yup, when you don't read the actual debate, find the shortest post and critisize it. Aside from trolling, no problem.

After all, if your stance is sound, you should have no problem with a rebuttal.

I'll add my rebuttals when you actually start debating me. Not pointing out random posts and commenting on them.

Did I say poverty is the only cause of crime? Did anyone here say poverty is the only cause of crime? [/B]

Yes, Crimzon said poverty causes crime. No alternative explanations.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Because THEY do not have the proper education. You can blame that on society or on them, your call.

I choose to blame misfortune. The odds are drastically stacked up against poor people when they hope to attain an education; the members of higher classes have a far easier time to do so. The competition simply isn't even, which is why poor people are hardly to be blamed for falling behind on educational matters.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
The statistics do NOT speak of racism. In fact you haven't introduced a shred of evidence that racism is still dominating our country. Hell, look at who our president is.

Which is a sign that racism is in a state of deterioration, not that it is completely gone.

Look at the statistics. Let's assume that whites genuinely make up 80% of the U.S. If everything was fair and equal, they would also make up 80% of the poverty class- which means 12% of the general populace. However, this is not reality. Not only do whites not have the considerable majority among the people in poverty, they're actually in a minority. ****, 46% of African American kids live in a state of poverty.

I think this is essential proof that there is still a lack of complete tolerance in the U.S, and that segregation is still a problem.

Or, alternatively, you can simply say that this is proof that poor people are more likely to remain poor. Throughout the course of history, discrimination against minorities has been a considerable social issue, which ultimately led to poverty among these minorities. Now, these poor people had kids and presumably bred with their own race; and the descendants of that class still make up the majority of the poor in the U.S.

You choose which explanation you prefer.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Except B is everyone's favorite justification/get out of jail card. Lets NOT take responsibility, lets blame someone else! Let me ask you a question. When you see a murderer convicted, do you ask "What societal forces made him behave this way?" If so, then I rest my case.

People aren't born with a set personality. Of course, there are some innate traits (like intelligence. Hint hint), but the actual personality is largely dominated by education and external culture. Therefore, it's always fascinating to see what kind of societal forces drove people to behave the way they do. It's not the entirety of the explanation, but if you ignore it, you can still the whole deal.

And do you honestly think those black folks in un-livable conditions sit home and whine about how much racism there is in the world? The survival instinct disproves that. People are naturally going to do their best in order to survive; the fact that the statistics prove that certain ethnic groups make up the large portion of the poverty class is a testament to the fact that there is a degree of racism in the U.S, even if it isn't exactly visible.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
See what you're doing is indicating your opinion on an issue, and interpreting the alleged logical deduction of that opinion, as fact. And segregation? Give me a break. I live with all minorities. I play sports with them, watch movies with them, etc. Perceived racism.

Personal experience vs. facts. The facts? Although segregation is in a state of declining in modern times, the U.S, especially the metropolitan areas, are divided into predominantly 'black' and 'white neighborhoods.

Now, there isn't any conceptual problem with that; you can't force people who don't want to live with each other to do so. But the problem is, blacks neighborhoods are in a state of vast poverty, especially in comparison to the far richer white neighborhoods.

Studies prove that blacks who live in suburban areas and have a middle-class income are the ones who live in 'white' neighborhoods. Meanwhile, black neighborhoods are far poorer.

These are facts. Make out of them whatever you want to.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
How about the fact that
Really? And it doesn't matter to you that white people make up 80% of America as of 2006? What point do you have exactly? None

What the hell does that have anything to do with anything? Minorities have a disproportionate presence among the groups in poverty. I think this ultimately indicates that there is still a level of unequal opportunities among races within the U.S. Do you have an alternative explanation?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You're not born skilled. Where is this shit coming from?

You're born with several innate abilities, upon which a personality is built (largely by external factors). On of these abilities is intelligence. Now, intelligence is relative to learning abilities, which means people with a higher intelligence are going to have a far easier time learning, studying, and competing in the economy of the modern world.

There's a definite level of contribution that different people can offer. Some individuals, not out of conscious choice (but rather out of innate traits, which are dictated by genetics and luck), are capable of contributing different things to society.

Now, I don't think there's a particular problem with the fact that intelligent people make more money than unintelligent people. But, regardless of this fact, it is completely unfair that less capable people (the weaker members of society), who aren't so out of a conscious choice, are abandoned to poverty and minimum wage jobs. On some level, the individuals who do their very best to contribute to society with their own (admittedly inferior, or at least not needed) should receive a degree of governmental help in order to balance the scales.

And this is not to say that poor people are dumber than the wealthy. It's just that dumb poor people are far more likely to engage in manual jobs, while dumb rich people can still live off of their (presumably inherited) fortune. And, of course, there's a degree of favoritism in our society. The wealthy and the middle class have a far easier time getting a decent education and surviving in the modern economy than the poor, and this is a rather inarguable thing.

Also, I NEVER said that poverty is the only reason for crime. But it is the most common reason among the working class.

how is this related to star wars?
lol

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Nope, I just didn't feel the need to respond to it.
I stopped reading here. Concession accepted, you got owned.

And before you bring up trolling again, I advise you to take a look at what the rules have to say about socks.

Originally posted by Publius II
I stopped reading here. Concession accepted, you got owned.

And before you bring up trolling again, I advise you to take a look at what the rules have to say about socks.

Wonderful. So you can't even acknowledge that your reading comprehension skills blow, and that you're claiming I'm arguing something I'm not. That makes you look like a fool who picks out random posts instead reading the whole discussion. Try harder next time. Now either bring up a valid point, concede the fact that you can't read or don't want to read, or just stop trolling. And as usual, calling me a sock doesn't make it so.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
So you can't even acknowledge that your reading comprehension skills blow [...] Now either bring up a valid point, concede the fact that you can't read or don't want to read [...]
Of the five sources you cited, the only one that was actually valid didn't even support your point.

Pot, kettle, black.

nd that you're claiming I'm arguing something I'm not.
Go quote me.

That makes you look like a fool who picks out random posts instead reading the whole discussion. Try harder next time.
I lol'd.

or just stop trolling.
You still haven't explained how I'm trolling.

And as usual, calling me a sock doesn't make it so.
Everyone who's been here since '06 knows it. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge it while bashing Nebaris and calling me a troll just makes you look even more pathetic.

Originally posted by Publius II
Of the five sources you cited, the only one that was actually valid didn't even support your point.

What was my point exactly seeing as how you missed 99% of the debate?

You still haven't explained how I'm trolling.

Picking out random posts, not reading the actual argument, claiming to know what the point was without reading an argument, assuming, going from thread to thread correcting people, where should I stop, troll?

Everyone who's been here since '06 knows it. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge it while bashing Nebaris and calling me a troll just makes you look even more pathetic.

ROFL. "Everybody knows it!" That's hilarious. What are you, a prissy schoolgirl? Not only does everyone "not know it", but there's no proof, and repeating your hilarious contention still doesn't make it so, it just makes you look retarded. So if by everyone you mean "you", troll, then you are correct. But please, keep lying to yourself.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
What was my point exactly seeing as how you missed 99% of the debate?
You
I don't doubt poverty causes crime, but it is my understanding that crime causes poverty on more occasions.
Me
You've provided no sources to corroborate that theory.
You
Except I have and it's not a theory.
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/fea...me-and-poverty/
http://www.democraticunderground.co...mp;mesg_id=1102
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,485052,00.html
http://www.children.smartlibrary.or...fm?segment=1671
http://davidism.blogspot.com/2007/1...ause-crime.html

Or are all of these sources not acceptable to you? This isn't a theory, it's common sense.

Clear enough for you?

Picking out random posts,
It wasn't random; it was the worst one yet. If it makes you feel better, I will consistently respond to each and every one of your on-topic posts from here on out.

not reading the actual argument,
I read the entire thing.

claiming to know what the point was without reading an argument, assuming,
See the above.

going from thread to thread correcting people,
Point out another, then establish that others - whom you notably aren't accusing of trolling - weren't doing the same. When you fail at that, I'll laugh at the double standard.

where should I stop, troll?
Again; you know the policy. Report me, or ignore me. Otherwise, stop bitching.

ROFL. "Everybody knows it!" That's hilarious. What are you, a prissy schoolgirl? Not only does everyone "not know it", but there's no proof, and repeating your hilarious contention still doesn't make it so, it just makes you look retarded. So if by everyone you mean "you", troll, then you are correct. But please, keep lying to yourself.
KMC Profile: Darth Sexy
KMC Profile: tdtd
EoD Profile: Dave
EoD Profile: David

tdtd banned on: July 12, 2006.
Darth Sexy registration date: July 12, 2006.

tdtd IM: Dave111283
tdtd EoD username: Dave
Darth Sexy EoD username: David

Dave [tdtd], in reponse to this thread at EoD:

Senior at UT@Austin majoring in Economics.. Taking the LSATS in december..Online marketing for 6 years..
[Does anyone really need me to quote DS mentioning UT or the LSATs?]

Darth Sexy's profile:

Location: University of Texas-Austin(Aka libe
And taking a look at David's profile (linked above), we see that his age was 25 as of the banning last year. Didn't you just turn 26?

And just for kicks, from tdtd's profile:

User banned by BackFire, permanently

Reason: Trolling after several warnings.

So basically, your story is that two Jewish* college students attending UT who had previously attended college in Florida and planned on taking the LSATs "[last] December" both hit up the exact same two forums around the same time; you joined the same day the other one was banned from here for trolling. Meanwhile, the first Jewish Texan was hanging out at EoD, which you joined several months after he was banned [for trolling again, in the eyes of those admins]. You also share a very similar writing style [I urge those of you reading this who are actually unconvinced to take a peek].

If you're really a different person, I swear to Godpromise I'll convert.

*
___Oh right, I also have 1 semester left of college. Afterwards I'm going to Yeshiva in Israel for a year(yes I'm Jewish). Then I'll either start law school or run my own company in South Florida.
From David's introductory post at EoD.

Uhh, your link to DS's profile goes to your own. Other than that, pwnage.

Fixed, I think.

Yep. Now it is pure, unadulterated pwn.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
Yep. Now it is pure, unadulterated pwn.
Of course, the mods will quickly gloss over this and he'll worm his way out of a ban again, but in all honesty I don't even want to see him get banned; I like his cheap entertainment.

Originally posted by Publius II
Of course, the mods will quickly gloss over this and he'll worm his way out of a ban again, but in all honesty I don't even want to see him get banned; I like his cheap entertainment.

Hell, nothing like a good troll right? Except I haven't gone nor planned on ever going to Yeshiva. The mods will "gloss" over this and realize it's a troll being a troll.

Originally posted by Publius II

Point out another, then establish that others - whom you notably aren't accusing of trolling - weren't doing the same. When you fail at that, I'll laugh at the double standard.

Seeing as how I've been arguing with Crimzon since day one and you just popped your internet head in, I find your denial hilarious.

[quote]KMC Profile: Darth Sexy
KMC Profile: tdtd
EoD Profile: Dave
EoD Profile: David

tdtd banned on: July 12, 2006.
Darth Sexy registration date: July 12, 2006.

tdtd IM: Dave111283
tdtd EoD username: Dave
Darth Sexy EoD username: David


....? I don't have an aim "dave111283". I didn't take a look at the profiles because it would consume the time I could be laughing at your obsessive stupidity.

Darth Sexy's profile: And taking a look at David's profile (linked above), we see that his age was 25 as of the banning last year. Didn't you just turn 26?

No, I'm 25. But great math.

And just for kicks, from tdtd's profile😖o basically, your story is that two Jewish* college students attending UT who had previously attended college in Florida and planned on taking the LSATs "[last] December" both hit up the exact same two forums around the same time; you joined the same day the other one was banned from here for trolling. Meanwhile, the first Jewish Texan was hanging out at EoD, which you joined several months after he was banned [for trolling again, in the eyes of those admins]. You also share a very similar writing style [I urge those of you reading this who are actually unconvinced to take a peek].

Again, I haven't looked the profile and your "conclusive proof" because I find it hilarious that you would obsess so much about something that wasn't true. Try harder next time, champ.

If you're really a different person, I swear to Godpromise I'll convert.

Get your torah/cross ready then big boy, you make a living out of being wrong.

Oh btw if you DID read the entire arguments, you wouldn't accuse me of arguing something I'm not. So again, either your reading comprehension skills need a long overdue tuneup, or you pick and choose what you feel like reading.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Except I haven't gone nor planned on ever going to Yeshiva.
You
I know MANY people living in Israel, including Yeshivas and mostly the Israeli army, and as someone who's been to Israel on multiple occasions, I have an idea of the situation there.
You're either lying there [you know Yeshivas, but you've never even visisted them?], or you're lying now [duh]. I don't know who you think you're fooling.

Seeing as how I've been arguing with Crimzon since day one and you just popped your internet head in, I find your denial hilarious.
Sorry, I didn't realize I had to start a discussion to be a part of it. I'll point that out next time you post in a thread you didn't start, 'kay?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Oh btw if you DID read the entire arguments, you wouldn't accuse me of arguing something I'm not. So again, either your reading comprehension skills need a long overdue tuneup, or you pick and choose what you feel like reading.
I told you to quote me; go find where I said you were arguing something you weren't arguing. Go ahead.

Originally posted by Publius II
You're either lying there [you know Yeshivas, but you've never even visisted them?], or you're lying now [duh]. I don't know who you think you're fooling.

Are you retarded? You claim that I claimed I was going to Yeshiva. I claimed that I never planned on going to Yeshiva. I KNOW people that go to Yeshiva, as will most Jews. What is so hard to understand about this?

Sorry, I didn't realize I had to start a discussion to be a part of it. I'll point that out next time you post in a thread you didn't start, 'kay?

K sweetheart.

Originally posted by Publius II
I told you to quote me; go find where I said you were arguing something you weren't arguing. Go ahead.

You apparently think you know what i'm arguing, otherwise you wouldn't have said something as blatantly apparent as "poor people that are poor because of circumstance need to receive welfare", or something like that, indicating I was somehow arguing against this point when I have always argued FOR it. Don't pick and choose little parts of the argument because it's quick, either address the argument as a whole or don't.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Are you retarded? You claim that I claimed I was going to Yeshiva. I claimed that I never planned on going to Yeshiva. I KNOW people that go to Yeshiva, as will most Jews. What is so hard to understand about this?

K sweetheart.

Sure thing sock.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You apparently think you know what i'm arguing, otherwise you wouldn't have said something as blatantly apparent as "poor people that are poor because of circumstance need to receive welfare", or something like that, indicating I was somehow arguing against this point when I have always argued FOR it. Don't pick and choose little parts of the argument because it's quick, either address the argument as a whole or don't.
Don't assume intent, sock.