Originally posted by Darth ThorLol I had no idea about that, but yeah that's the real one.
^ Is that the actual Mark Hamill one, or was it the one photoshopped with Sebastian Stan's face. Was really hard to tell the difference. But I think the Sebastian one had a bit of a stubble.Either way, good looking guy.
Originally posted by BeniboyblingI didn't actually know this, but I had kind of always assumed that this was the case. I mean, the two were snorting coke together all throughout the filming of ESB- it seems only natural they were banging, too.
http://variety.com/2016/biz/news/carrie-fisher-harrison-ford-affair-star-wars-1201918804/Holy moley.
Mad jelly of Ford hitting Carrie Fischer in her prime years, though.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So again you're just saying its improbable not impossible like I said posts ago. Most people wouldn't get into this ultra nerdy debate about a vague comment you took as literally as possible. Who gives a **** who these guys are attracted to.
I clarified that there are exceptions, which would indeed mean it's improbable and not impossible, but I hold that these cases are exceptional and outside of the norm.
I'm not taking a vague comment and turning it into a debate. You disagreed with Thor and countered with your own thoughts on the matter, and I agreed with him and proceeded to counter yours. What's the big deal?
I guess I can agree that it's not really important, lol. It's just a discussion.
Originally posted by BeniboyblingIt wasn't a comparison (wouldn't do that to him). I know people have called you out for trying to act like him before. Of course, your retardation makes it harder to process things, but please try to understand that with the exception of a few, no one gives a shit about what is said here. So, the whole delusional "I made you angry" self-wank simply doesn't cut it anymore.
Temp is a smart and funny guy, so actually I find the comparison flattering. 🙂
Anyway I've evidently unintentionally triggered you, so let me explain my argument. First of all no, it does not have anything to do with "ma hooman rights!!11!" and no, nowhere did I call anyone who disagrees with me a "psychopath", lmfao pls take your meds. But I get it, framing the world around you within the contexts of this crwybaby SJW narrative makes things easier for you to understand, yet the truth is my actual beliefs are predicated on logic and common sense . Daunting concepts I know! But don't worry, I'll walk you through them.Your funniest joke so far.
Let's take the example of a heterosexual male, such a person has their sexual instinct predisposed towards the opposite sex at a very early stage. And there is no evidence I'm aware of, scientific or otherwise, that suggests this biological impulse is made biased towards any one ethnicity.Obsession is indeed a psychological problem. Being obsessed with pale skinned girls isn't an exception. Nothing suggests that the obsession must be triggered by racist ideologies.Yes, as a result of one's upbringing, it stands to reason that you'd develop preferences towards certain races and colour, for example if you grow up in a largerly white environment you'd be more attracted to white people, and vice versa. However to be entirely unattracted to the body of an entire ethnicity of women, wholesale, would be a subversion of your sexual instincts. And in that sense, yes, biologically perverse. You'd have to have developed some kind of complex powerful enough to essentially suppress that instinct, like a phobia, be it triggered by a traumatic experience or a irrational, racist attitude. Not just a disinclination to "slitty eyes".
In fact given that, I expect the number of straight men who fit into this formula are extremely low, and if they are, are probably easily to identify as out and out racist or racially phobic. Take Ziggy for example, but of course he's probably lying.
Tl;dr: if you're are a guy are your not attracted to Beyonce or Rihanna you are either gay, racist, or bullshitting. 👆Assuming that they don't have the celebrity charisma and stage makeup/lighting to make this a fair comparison, a straight, single guy (who is not hindered by the factors in my previous post) rejecting them is not really that absurd.
Originally posted by Ursumeles
Including Solo's with Skywalker ancestors:
1/2. Mara Jade Skywalker
1/2. Jaina Solo
3. Leia Organa Solo
4. Jacen
Eh, me being bi I actually am 50-50 split on the gender thing. Mara is by far the most attractive though, yeah.
But the Anakins are ahead of Jacen for me, tbh. I think every Skywalker besides Uncle Bantha and Kol have the general handsome-gene, tho.
Originally posted by MythLord
Eh, me being bi I actually am 50-50 split on the gender thing. Mara is by far the most attractive though, yeah.But the Anakins are ahead of Jacen for me, tbh. I think every Skywalker besides Uncle Bantha and Kol have the general handsome-gene, tho.
Originally posted by SiniousI'll take the compliment anyway, and you mean AP lmao.
It wasn't a comparison (wouldn't do that to him). I know people have called you out for trying to act like him before. Of course, your retardation makes it harder to process things, but please try to understand that with the exception of a few, no one gives a shit about what is said here. So, the whole delusional "I made you angry" self-wank simply doesn't cut it anymore.
On the other hand if you aren't mad, stop acting like it. 😂
Your funniest joke so far.I might find that cutting if your rebuttal wasn't so pathetic. 🙂
Obsession is indeed a psychological problem. Being obsessed with pale skinned girls isn't an exception. Nothing suggests that the obsession must be triggered by racist ideologies.1. We are not talking about obsessions, but repulsions. 2. I never said it "must" be triggered by racial phobia, only that it was a probable reason. But given you appeared to have conceded its subversive I guess this is a concession.
Assuming that they don't have the celebrity charisma and stage makeup/lighting to make this a fair comparison, a straight, single guy (who is not hindered by the factors in my previous post) rejecting them is not really that absurd.That's rather besides the point I was making.
Originally posted by Kurk
Please rank these candidates using the 1-10 scale:1- Monster can't look at them or they'll burn your eyes out.
2- Heinous, Busted- Needs plastic surgery.
3- Plain Ugly- Someone who was born ugly.
4- Below Average/Unattractive- Someone you'd never go out with.
5-Average, could be slightly unnatractive, someone you wouldn't look at twice.
6- Barely Do-able, that's if they're "endowed" in other places. If not, you most likely wouldn't. But they can look ok if they try hard.
7- Cute/Doable- someone you wouldn't be ashamed of. Definitely Date material/maybe more.
8-General Hot/Good Looking- May or may not be exotic looking or just average hot, but definitely someone you'd ****, want to have a long term relationship with.
9-Super Smoking Hot- People you don't see in public often and someone you'd die to ****.
10- Perfection- dosen't exist but someone can be as high as a 9.9, close to it.[b]1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
5.)
6.)
[/B]
1. 10
2. 7
3. 8
4. 7
5. 7
6. 8
