Originally posted by MythLord
So the only reason it's a hinderence is because these people can't have kids? In a world that's already suffering from overpopulation not having progeny isn't really that bad a thing.
You are at a disadvantage from an evolutionary perspective, from a societal perspective, you're not exactly suitable to keep the Genpop at a replacement rate. If you were, western governments wouldn't be importing sub human immigrant masses from backwater cultures, due to their native populations declining. I don't exactly think **** are helping that issue. And of course, if those countries ever suffered a mass epidemic, war or holocaust, you'd probably wouldn't want a significant proportion of grindr swiping fairies trying to spread their degenerate lifestyles to the young, being a perversion of the natural created order that pairs male and female through marriage for the purpose of procreation and family formation, which is the basis of all human society.
And, by the by, homosexuals can reproduce: Lesbians can get artificially inseminated and gays can always have a surrogate mother.
If you're reproductive success hinders on the current state of modern technology and science, then yes, you are a defective individual compared to those who don't have that reliance. You dumbfuk. So yes, given these parameters, faggotry is a disorder and a disadvantage that evolutionists should all agree upon. Today, medicine allows an impotent schlub with erectile disfunction, to get his johnson hard. This takes into regard that there was a problem with his reproductive functions in the first instant. The same is true of gays, whom only require a mother to give up the kin she birthed, lol.
And then there's always adoption, given that a considerable chunk of children get either abandoned by or lose their parents at a young age.
Yeah, this has nothing to do with evolution and reproduction. It's not helping populations maintain a replacement rate either. Besides, what's you're suggesting
is not happening at large enough rate to justify Fags.
So really... what's the problem, here? [/B]
The list goes on.
From a practical standpoint, homosexuality is a menace to public health. Homosexuals are not only promiscuous to a degree that normal, heterosexual people (even experienced players) would find shocking, but their particular sexual proclivities leave them highly susceptible to acquiring and spreading contagious diseases. Gays are essentially walking petri dishes for new disease incubation. These diseases and infections then get passed into the normal population over time. **** also molest children at an alarming rate, and a huge percentage of homosexuals themselves admit to being preyed upon as children, the experience of which likely warped their sexuality as adults (just look at Aubere). Given these facts, the practical man should have little patience for the promotion of homosexuality in his society.
There is no reasonable defense of homosexuality from any perspective. The libertarian "live and let live" nonsense might hold true if homosexuals were holed up in underground caves on the other side of the world, but newsflash, they aren't. In fact, they have an enormously outsized and influential presence in popular culture and actively work to mainstream and normalize their dangerous, degenerate lifestyles and actively encourage children to "experiment" with their sexuality and thus become homosexuals themselves. You can't leave them alone because they won't leave you and your children alone. It's not a question of letting people have sex with who they want because it doesn't impact you. It's a question of whether you will sit idly by as your society is slowly given over to sexual degenerates who have an active and stated interest in turning your children into homosexuals through brainwashing, molestation or drug-fueled "experimentation" as part of a nihilistic, hedonistic lifestyle, which actively harms society.
Men have no moral obligation to accept homosexuality. Being against it does not make one a bad person, nor does it means that you must personally hate homosexual people. It simply means that you refuse to approve of their toxic, anti-social, degenerate behavior, and that you will actively seek to limit their ability to spread their poisonous lifestyle to impressionable children.
Originally posted by Selenial
I will never forget the bonds formed during the Comedy Central Roast of AurbereWas an browsing old posts with Bart the other day, top notch entertainment