Originally posted by Sam Z
This is how I see it. Fox fights Wolverine and takes him down coz he is faster and stronger.
If Snake was able to take out Fox, Wolverine is too. Snake is not faster or stronger then Wolverine is, and Wolverine is also better fighter, has a healing factor, and has unbreakable skeleton and claws, which renders Fox's sword kind of useless...
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
If Snake was able to take out Fox, Wolverine is too. Snake is not faster or stronger then Wolverine is, and Wolverine is also better fighter, has a healing factor, and has unbreakable skeleton and claws, which renders Fox's sword kind of useless...
Not useless at all and I would also argue that Wolverine is a better fighter. You can't say that Wolverine would take down Fox only because Snake did. It doesn't work that way.
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
And none of these guys will not be able to really hurt Colossus...so a thunderclap will take them out.
Vamp can paralise him, Solidus can fire dozens missiles at him. Fox CAN hurt him with his blade if attacks many times. His sword cuts through steel as easy as through butter.
Originally posted by Sam Z
Not useless at all and I would also argue that Wolverine is a better fighter. You can't say that Wolverine would take down Fox only because Snake did. It doesn't work that way.
Uhh....that's EXACTLY how it works. If A > B and B > C, then A > C. Unless, of course, B had some specialized way to beat C that A doesn't have. But "B," Snake, doesn't. Wolverine is almost identical to Snake in that he has been trained all his life to be a weapon, is peak human in every physical category, and, while he COULD fight an entire army, also has the stealth capabilities to go around them. Then Wolverine has his skeleton, claws, and healing on top of that. I think this is pretty much a no-brainer for the X-guys.
Originally posted by DarkCrawlerYou of all people said to everyone because x beats x doesn't mean x beats x. 😐
If Snake was able to take out Fox, Wolverine is too. Snake is not faster or stronger then Wolverine is, and Wolverine is also better fighter, has a healing factor, and has unbreakable skeleton and claws, which renders Fox's sword kind of useless...
Originally posted by Ritoshi
You of all people said to everyone because x beats x doesn't mean x beats x. 😐
Wolverine is stronger then Snake. Faster then Snake. Better trained then Snake. More experienced then Snake. He also has adamantium claws and skeleton and healing factor. He has every advantage over Snake.
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
It applies in some cases, though. If Person A can beat Person C, and Person B has every physical and skill advantage, then Person B should be able to do that too.Wolverine is stronger then Snake. Faster then Snake. Better trained then Snake. More experienced then Snake. He also has adamantium claws and skeleton and healing factor. He has every advantage over Snake.
Not faster nor stronger. And CQC is a match for Logan's technique.
Yes, he has heling and claws. Still Fox and Vamp are fasetr, and I'm not even sure Wolverine's claws would cut through Fox's armor that easy. I know he cuts metal with them but also don't forget that he had problems with cutting Colossus. So Fox still has the edge. Plus his third eye attack (not sure what is it but works good)