Superman vs. Dracula

Started by He-guy8816 pages
Originally posted by batdude123
Superman’s greatest rival is Captain Marvel. He has on many occasions taken CM magical lightning attacks and kept on coming for more. CM also derives his magical abilities directly from the Wizard Shazam. Just saying that Crucifer has magic, does NOT mean he would pull the majority of the wins. He lacks the speed, reflexes, strength, and versatility to hang with Supes. And it’s really getting annoying how everybody thinks that just because somebody wields magic, they would automatically defeat Superman. He’s taken on, and defeated his fair share of magic wielders. It’s just one possibility to hurt Superman, it’s not that he’s completely invulnerable to it. He has resisted the affects of magic before. So just saying Crucifer uses black magic or whatever, doesn’t mean he can defeat Superman. Superman would own Crucifer in a fight just like he would own Dracula in a fight.

not if he took his powers from him its black magic that kinda stuff happens 🙂

Originally posted by He-guy88
not if he took his powers from him its black magic that kinda stuff happens 🙂

Explain to me exactly how he would be able to ensue the affects of "black magic" on Superman before he totally gets pwned by Superman.

as soon as the fight starts he can just use the spell their it is and were not sopose to use tv arugments but y was the witches able to do it to him on smallville

also wat part of curcifer beat him do u not understand i mean i showed u guys wat u asked me to and when i did u call it pis or deny it ur entitled to ur opion but when i got prof wats make it so disredable and not snoops just because their two diffrent writeings dont mean nothing others could say its the other way around

Originally posted by He-guy88
as soon as the fight starts he can just use the spell their it is and were not sopose to use tv arugments but y was the witches able to do it to him on smallville

also wat part of curcifer beat him do u not understand i mean i showed u guys wat u asked me to and when i did u call it pis or deny it ur entitled to ur opion but when i got prof wats make it so disredable and not snoops just because their two diffrent writeings dont mean nothing others could say its the other way around

It seemed to me that Superman was standing still, and not moving while Crucifer bit him. How is he going to cast a spell quickly enough to cope with Superman's mind and light-speed quickness? Before Crucifer could open his mouth, he would be punched to the sun. Besides you can't use TV shows as proof because this is a COMIC BOOK vs. forum. Why exactly couldn't Superman use his T-Vo on Crucifer? Besides, I've got a comic where Superman and Batman take down Green Lantern, Black Lightning, Starfire, Katana, Power Girl, Captain Atom, and Major Force. Does that mean that it should happen on a normal basis? No way. You are just gonna have to realize and accept the fact that there are some things in comics that should've just not happened. The faster you realize this, the quicker any of this can make sense to you. While you are holding on to the one shred of evidence you have, it doesn't mean much to a blood-lusted Superman or a Superman going all out. NO vampire could ever harness the power to ever tap into the vastness of Superman's power. It wouldn't happen. Superman is easily quicker than anything Crucifer could throw at him. Whether it is biting him (would not happen because of Superman's ability to fly, vibrate intangible or invisible, his speed, and his super senses) or mummbling a phrase to put Superman under his black magic powers. This is the main reason why Superman is such a killer when it comes to guys even in the realm of his power possibility. His speed is usually the deciding factor in fights against him. Yes, Crucifer is nothing that Superman hasn't handled in the past before. I mean he's taken down a planet ruler and master commander of an army before, as well as an interstellar conqueror. I'm sorry but there is nothing in Crucifer's power set that suggests he can take down Superman. Plus, how could he control what he couldn't see? Superman has the power to vibrate his molecules to become invisible. A Superman using ALL of his powers to his fullest extent would take down ANY vampire including Crucifer, and frankly I'm getting tired of this subject. Especially when it's so obvious to everybody else but you. This is really testing my patience as well as making me tired. If you believe that Crucifer could possibly beat Superman, well then that's your problem. Superman wins against Crucifer AT LEAST 8-9/10.

Originally posted by batdude123
It seemed to me that Superman was standing still, and not moving while Crucifer bit him. How is he going to cast a spell quickly enough to cope with Superman's mind and light-speed quickness? Before Crucifer could open his mouth, he would be punched to the sun. Besides you can't use TV shows as proof because this is a COMIC BOOK vs. forum. Why exactly couldn't Superman use his T-Vo on Crucifer? Besides, I've got a comic where Superman and Batman take down Green Lantern, Black Lightning, Starfire, Katana, Power Girl, Captain Atom, and Major Force. Does that mean that it should happen on a normal basis? No way. You are just gonna have to realize and accept the fact that there are some things in comics that should've just not happened. The faster you realize this, the quicker any of this can make sense to you. While you are holding on to the one shred of evidence you have, it doesn't mean much to a blood-lusted Superman or a Superman going all out. NO vampire could ever harness the power to ever tap into the vastness of Superman's power. It wouldn't happen. Superman is easily quicker than anything Crucifer could throw at him. Whether it is biting him (would not happen because of Superman's ability to fly, vibrate intangible or invisible, his speed, and his super senses) or mummbling a phrase to put Superman under his black magic powers. This is the main reason why Superman is such a killer when it comes to guys even in the realm of his power possibility. His speed is usually the deciding factor in fights against him. Yes, Crucifer is nothing that Superman hasn't handled in the past before. I mean he's taken down a planet ruler and master commander of an army before, as well as an interstellar conqueror. I'm sorry but there is nothing in Crucifer's power set that suggests he can take down Superman. Plus, how could he control what he couldn't see? Superman has the power to vibrate his molecules to become invisible. A Superman using ALL of his powers to his fullest extent would take down ANY vampire including Crucifer, and frankly I'm getting tired of this subject. Especially when it's so obvious to everybody else but you. This is really testing my patience as well as making me tired. If you believe that Crucifer could possibly beat Superman, well then that's your problem. Superman wins against Crucifer AT LEAST 8-9/10.

it happened u just need to get over it man a vampire beat ur allpowerful superman their is no other argument that u can use becaus it happened and untill i see the prof by u that this is not a real comic witch it is cause it happened i showed it to u then ur wrong

Originally posted by He-guy88
it happened u just need to get over it man a vampire beat ur allpowerful superman their is no other argument that u can use becaus it happened and untill i see the prof by u that this is not a real comic witch it is cause it happened i showed it to u then ur wrong

Quit ignoring what I'm posting and actually put some thought into it. Yeah he bit Superman, whoopty freakin doo! It served its own purpose in the comic, so it was there for a reason. Anways, sh*t happens in comics that don't make sense. For instance, Spider-man has defeated Firelord before. If you knew anything about Firelord, you would know that he is a herald of Galactus. By your logic, Spider-man should be beating Silver Sufer level characters and that really doesn't fly around here. Use sense, not just one picture in your arguements. If that's how you're going to debate around here, you are going to lose more often than not.

I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH BAT ON THIS ONE WHY HAS THIS NONSENSE BEEN GOIN ON THIS LONG 😠

Originally posted by hulk=strength
I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH BAT ON THIS ONE WHY HAS THIS NONSENSE BEEN GOIN ON THIS LONG 😠

I HAVE NO F*CKIN CLUE! 😠

BUT THEN AGAIN I KINDA FEEL HE GUY88 TO HMMMM

KIDDIN KIDDIN DO SUPES JUSTICE GET HIM BAT GET HIM

Originally posted by batdude123
Quit ignoring what I'm posting and actually put some thought into it. Yeah he bit Superman, whoopty freakin doo! It served its own purpose in the comic, so it was there for a reason. Anways, sh*t happens in comics that don't make sense. For instance, Spider-man has defeated Firelord before. If you knew anything about Firelord, you would know that he is a herald of Galactus. By your logic, Spider-man should be beating Silver Sufer level characters and that really doesn't fly around here. Use sense, not just one picture in your arguements. If that's how you're going to debate around here, you are going to lose more often than not.

fine if were usein that then dracula only died because it survesed the purpose in that comic see i can say it too

NO DISRESPECT HEGUY88 BUT YOU DO THE SAME THING REGARDIN PROOF IN TH JUGGSVSHULK ARGUEMENT

WAR STOOPED JUGGS IT HAPPENED IT AINT PIS IT HAPPENED 😄

Originally posted by He-guy88
fine if were usein that then dracula only died because it survesed the purpose in that comic see i can say it too

doh Dude, GET A CLUE! Dracula died because Superman's cellular structure is nothing but solar powered energy. So in affect, it was like taking a bite out of the sun. That's why he died.

Originally posted by hulk=strength
WAR STOOPED JUGGS IT HAPPENED IT AINT PIS IT HAPPENED 😄

id like to see were i said it was pis

UHOH BATS IS GETTIN PISSED GET HIM BAT GO IN FOR THE KILL 😠

MANY A TIMES BY SAYIN JUGGS CANT BE STOPPED OR BEATEN

Originally posted by batdude123
doh Dude, GET A CLUE! Dracula died because Superman's cellular structure is nothing but solar powered energy. So in affect, it was like taking a bite out of the sun. That's why he died.
And that's what the scan said.

Originally posted by batdude123
doh Dude, GET A CLUE! Dracula died because Superman's cellular structure is nothing but solar powered energy. So in affect, it was like taking a bite out of the sun. That's why he died.

so ur saying that if u say that u can say when somethings pis and say that it only happened because it suited the comics purpose but when i say that it only suited the comics purpose its wrong wats up with that wat makes u so much bett then i to be able to say that

Originally posted by snoopdogg
And that's what the scan said.

but when i say wat my comic say y is it discredited or thrown out huh??