Originally posted by Menetnashté
Why the hell is everyone saying clinton? I hope it's just a joke, he was one of the worst presidents in a long long time. I mean he was just out for a night on the town he was a worthless piece of shit. Jimmy Carter was pretty bad to. Georgy hasn't done me wrong yet though, so GWB
E-except for lying to you?
Originally posted by Menetnashté
Why the hell is everyone saying clinton? I hope it's just a joke, he was one of the worst presidents in a long long time. I mean he was just out for a night on the town he was a worthless piece of shit. Jimmy Carter was pretty bad to. Georgy hasn't done me wrong yet though, so GWB
yeah the people saying Clinton better just be joking.He was very corrupted as well.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
yeah the people saying Clinton better just be joking.He was very corrupted as well.
There is of course no difference between what Clinton did and what Bush still does? Clinton started an unjust war that caused the lives of 3500 Americans and more then a 100.000 up to a max of 800.000 Iraqi's. And Clinton of course created a huge debt for the United States unlike Bush did, and of course Clinton lied about having a sexual relationship with somebody instead of Bush who lied about Iraq it's links to Al Qaeda and WMD's...
oh no wait, that last one is actually true...
God that Clinton guy sucks.
yeah he sure does.Clinton gave Janet Reno the okay to burn down the waco complex and is involved up to his ears in the oklahoma city bombing.He had prior knowledge that would happen.Plus be glad that you were never a friend of Bill Clintons or knew of a scandal he was involved in because just about everybody that has been or knew at one time,has wound up as a mysterious dead body for knowing too much about him.Just do a google search of -"Clinton body count" and you will see all kinds of links that prove that.
you cross clinton,he has his CIA operatives bump people off for him.Bush has always done the same thing but he wasnt sloppy about it like Clinton.
Originally posted by Mr ParkerGo back to the conspiracy forum, shoo
yeah he sure does.Clinton gave Janet Reno the okay to burn down the waco complex and is involved up to his ears in the oklahoma city bombing.He had prior knowledge that would happen.Plus be glad that you were never a friend of Bill Clintons or knew of a scandal he was involved in because just about everybody that has been or knew at one time,has wound up as a mysterious dead body for knowing too much about him.Just do a google search of -"Clinton body count" and you will see all kinds of links that prove that.you cross clinton,he has his CIA operatives bump people off for him.Bush has always done the same thing but he wasnt sloppy about it like Clinton.
Originally posted by Strangelove
Well despite the lack of specificity in the thread title, I think it was obvious that he meant U.S. Presidents 😉
So, if I said "Who was the best king of the 13th century?", would it be right to only list, say, English kings on the poll? Of course not. If you specify which nation you're talking about, you leave yourself open to criticism.
"Who was the best king of the 13th century?" doesn't specify, so yes, that's what I mean. If I simply posted a subject with that title, and only put, for example, English kings of the 13th century (John, Henry III, Edward I) on the poll, that would be the same as has been done with this thread, which is biased and misleading.
However, if I said "Who was the best king of England of the 13th century?" that'd be another matter entirely.
Don't take this the wrong way, cos I'm not trying to have a go. I'm just trying to make a point that we could do with more clarity on these sort of subjects.
I'd definitely go with Reagan. It is unfortunate how Reagan actually turned out as President. The speech he gave at the Republican Convention for Goldwater was impressive and works even for today. But he did a 180 when he went into office.
Reagan I think directly or indirectly laid the footsteps for the situation like 9/11 and the events that followed. Therefore, I'll put the second Bush after him with Johnson a close third.
Oops, I did the top three worst.
The best on that list? Maybe Eisenhower just for warning of a military industrial-complex.