What if President Bush were assassinated?

I'm a dumbass?I'm not the one who would rather get himself and his family slaughtered ,than go defend his family aswell as his country.And I have no idea where you got you info from Iraq,but my older brother was a medic stationed there,he told me thing have improved a lot since they first arrived there back when the war began!We aren't winning the war on terror?Yeah right,last time I checked,we weren't the ones cowering in the mountains.🙄You wanna know who the real dumbass here is?You and your band of cowards.And yes,Iraq WAS a battleground before we made it!Or have you not been brushing up on your history?Acts of terror have been happening there since WW1!Hell,Winston Churchill himself was caught up in it!Don't give me that bullshit you call an excuse.Face it,if we hadn't gone there and set things straight,noone else would have!Again,you are pathetic,you make excuses to justify you not supporting your own country!And like I said,the Insurgents ARE connected to the terrorists,otherwise,they themselves wouldn't have survived this long!Why don't you get your head out of the sand and see the world for what it truly is?Or are you just afraid of the truth?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yet incredibly effective. It illicited a reaction from not one, but two idiots.

Someones been eating a bit too much sugar today 😐

Originally posted by Mišt
Someones been eating a bit too much sugar today 😐

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
It was not effective, because it made no sense--Bush is a president as was Kennedy.

And Chris Rock was referring to Tupac and Biggie in that skit.

Being or having been president has little to do with it. Martin Luther King was not president, nor was Malcom X. The reason the murders of Martin Luther King, Malcom X, and John F. Kennedy are considered to be assassinations is because they were all socially prominent people who were murdered for political reasons. The reason the murder of George W. Bush would not be considered an assassination is because like Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls, he is an ******* whose murder would simply get traffic moving more quickly.

Tell me,Adam.Why should I believe the words of a coward,such as yourself?They only hold bitter hate,no truth,only hate.If I didn't know any better,I would say you or Morgoth would jump at the chance to be the one to pull the trigger.

Originally posted by DE Luke
I'm a dumbass?I'm not the one who would rather get himself and his family slaughtered ,than go defend his family aswell as his country.

Yes, you are. The second part of that statement is proof; it makes no sense and is based on a ridiculous assumption.

Originally posted by DE Luke
And I have no idea where you got you info from Iraq,but my older brother was a medic stationed there,he told me thing have improved a lot since they first arrived there back when the war began!

Did I ever say things haven’t improved in Iraq? I’m sure they have (dear lord, I’d HOPE they made some progress), but there are still plenty of problems there that we need to take care of, and I am in full support of fixing those problems before we withdraw. However, it’s not going to be easy.

Originally posted by DE Luke
We aren't winning the war on terror?Yeah right,last time I checked,we weren't the ones cowering in the mountains.🙄

Again, I never SAID we weren’t winning, the thing is we can’t WIN! That is to say, we can’t STOP IT ALTOGETHER! There will always be terrorists, regardless of whether they are in the streets of Baghdad or in the mountains of Pakistan or on a New York City subway train. The terrorists don’t have to win, they just can’t lose. And if they can’t lose, we can’t win. Actually, it’s probably not best described as winning or losing; more accurate description might be keeping it under control, and we’re definitely working on that.

Originally posted by DE Luke
You wanna know who the real dumbass here is?You and your band of cowards

😕

Originally posted by DE Luke
And yes,Iraq WAS a battleground before we made it!Or have you not been brushing up on your history?Acts of terror have been happening there since WW1!Hell,Winston Churchill himself was caught up in it!Don't give me that bullshit you call an excuse

Acts of terrorism have been happening ALL OVER THE GLOBE for a long time, not just Iraq. Does that mean we should invade every country that has had acts of terrorism associated with it? Certainly not. Terrorists are different in that they can be anywhere and not necessarily linked to any particular country or government. So, inadvertently, we made Iraq the front line for the War on Terror by invading it. Makes things easier, you know. Americans like it that way.

Originally posted by DE Luke
Face it,if we hadn't gone there and set things straight,noone else would have!

You sound so sure of yourself! I’m not convinced that we had some sort of obligation to go in there and establish a new form of government. The Iraqi people have to WANT it bad enough, and if they really don’t want it things aren’t going to work so well (as we are beginning to see). Countries have had rebellions in the past and have successfully overthrown oppressive governments (for example…the United States!). Why should we have to go over and fight the Iraqi rebellion for them? When they don’t even want it!?!? I’m just saying, it would have been more effective had the Iraqi people used all their energy (and perhaps hatred towards America) and used it to overthrow oppressive dictators like Saddam Hussein. Many have done it in the past, so why should things be different now?

Originally posted by DE Luke
Again,you are pathetic,you make excuses to justify you not supporting your own country!

Not entirely accurate. I love America! I don’t see how you can just make that assumption, just because I don’t agree with everything the government has done. Call me crazy, but I’m not going to blindly follow whatever the government tells me just because I’m supposed to be patriotic. Can’t I love my country and still criticize my government for making mistakes; mistakes that often go against traditional American values?

Originally posted by DE Luke
And like I said,the Insurgents ARE connected to the terrorists,otherwise,they themselves wouldn't have survived this long!

Did I ever say they weren’t? Did you even READ my post?

Originally posted by DE Luke
Why don't you get your head out of the sand and see the world for what it truly is?Or are you just afraid of the truth?

Maybe you’ll be able to see the truth for yourself when you stop looking for it up your own @sshole.

Originally posted by DE Luke
I'm a dumbass?I'm not the one who would rather get himself and his family slaughtered ,than go defend his family aswell as his country.And I have no idea where you got you info from Iraq,but my older brother was a medic stationed there,he told me thing have improved a lot since they first arrived there back when the war began!We aren't winning the war on terror?Yeah right,last time I checked,we weren't the ones cowering in the mountains.🙄You wanna know who the real dumbass here is?You and your band of cowards.And yes,Iraq WAS a battleground before we made it!Or have you not been brushing up on your history?Acts of terror have been happening there since WW1!Hell,Winston Churchill himself was caught up in it!Don't give me that bullshit you call an excuse.Face it,if we hadn't gone there and set things straight,noone else would have!Again,you are pathetic,you make excuses to justify you not supporting your own country!And like I said,the Insurgents ARE connected to the terrorists,otherwise,they themselves wouldn't have survived this long!Why don't you get your head out of the sand and see the world for what it truly is?Or are you just afraid of the truth?

"Terror" is not an enemy, it is a tactic. A war cannot be waged, let alone won against a method for engaging an enemy. Claiming that we are "winning the war on terror" is equivocal to claiming that we are winning the war against ambushes or frontal assaults. It is completely assanine.

Moreover, the insurgency is a direct response to our military presence in Iraq. If a foreign country invaded the United States and destabilized the government while killing thousands of civilians in the process, American citizens would take up arms too.

Furthermore, if you are so courageous, why are you posting on a message board instead of "defending your family and your country in Iraq?"

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Being or having been president has little to do with it. Martin Luther King was not president, nor was Malcom X. The reason the murders of Martin Luther King, Malcom X, and John F. Kennedy are considered to be assassinations is because they were all socially prominent people who were murdered for political reasons. The reason the murder of George W. Bush would not be considered an assassination is because like Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls, he is an ******* whose murder would simply get traffic moving more quickly.

You're ridiculous for comparing Bush to Biggie and 'Pac. His assassination would be for no other reasons than political.

And Bush was far prominent than Kennedy could ever hope to be--his greatest accomplishment was getting to bone Marylin Monroe.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
You're ridiculous for comparing Bush to Biggie and 'Pac.

Says the man who believes:

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
...Bush was far prominent than Kennedy could ever hope to be...

😆

@Adam:I HAVE served my country,I completed my tour of duty there 7 months ago(and from what I saw,atleast it was better than it once was,this coming from someone who was actually THERE).Ive put in 2 requests to get back there,but I haven't heard back from my recruitment center yet.Why aren't you there?Or are you just afraid to defend your own country?

@Morgoth:I'm not even going to bother replying to that.If you haven't seen the truth and the world for what it already is, then you're wasting my time.I shouldve known you wouldve been too hard headed to actually see the truth that this world is a cruel one.I pity you.I really do.I just hope it's not your family or a family member of yours who gets killed in a terrorist attack.I wish you all the best regardless,but I don't hold any respect for you whatsoever.

Originally posted by DE Luke
I HAVE served my country,I completed my tour of duty there 7 months ago.Ive put in 2 requests to get back there,but I haven't heard back from my recruitment center yet.Why aren't you there?Or are you just afraid to defend your own country?

Several posts ago, you claimed only second-hand knowledge of the state of the war in Iraq:

Originally posted by DE Luke
And I have no idea where you got you info from Iraq, but my older brother was a medic stationed there, he told me thing have improved a lot since they first arrived there back when the war began!

Odd, considering that you are now claiming you served there.

Furthermore, according to records obtained by the Freedom of Information Act, due to the shortage of troops, the Defense Department has resorted to sending troops with severe psychological problems to Iraq or keeping those displaying signs of mental illness in combat. Yet, you who has successfully completed a tour of duty and subsequently sent two requests to return, cannot get deployed. Interesting.

Originally posted by DE Luke
I HAVE served my country,I completed my tour of duty there 7 months ago(and from what I saw,atleast it was better than it once was,this coming from someone who was actually THERE).Ive put in 2 requests to get back there,but I haven't heard back from my recruitment center yet.Why aren't you there?Or are you just afraid to defend your own country?

Additionally, you claim to have returned from Iraq seven months ago, but have been posting on KMC for nine months. For those who cannot do the math, you would have returned from Iraq in or near October, but by that point, you had already been posting on KMC for a solid two months. Not busy enough "defending your family and your country in Iraq" to post on a message board consistently for two months?

President Bush won't get assassinated because he's a republican. If anyone's going to get assassinated, it would be Kerry or Clinton. The Democrats. All the Kennedy's were democrats. Suprised? Bush is part of a secret organisation, and won't be assassinated. Well, he might. I mean, Nostradamus said so in his book. 😕

Originally posted by lord xyz
President Bush won't get assassinated because he's a republican. If anyone's going to get assassinated, it would be Kerry or Clinton. The Democrats. All the Kennedy's were democrats. Suprised? Bush is part of a secret organisation, and won't be assassinated. Well, he might. I mean, Nostradamus said so in his book. 😕

no. But it is true, see post 999 of conspiracy thread.

Originally posted by Morgoths_Wrath
How would you feel if George W. Bush was assassinated? It’s something I’ve been thinking about…as much as people hate Dubya, how many would be glad to see him dead? I’m sure there are plenty of people in the world who would like to see him dead, but what if he really was killed? How would you react?

It honestly wouldn't bother me. I would be relieved to be rid of him, and I would praise the person who did it. However, with Bush gone, it raises the wuestion of who will take over from him... 😘

with bush gone, we'll have dick instead.

I don't think I would lsoe sleep over it. But I also don't wish it to happen or anything.

Originally posted by lord xyz
with bush gone, we'll have dick instead.

Dick Cheney? Ooh...wasn't he the guy he shot the other guy because he thought he was a bird?