Superman/Captain Marvel vs Sentry/Thor

Started by Validus7 pages

Originally posted by S.S
How was it badly written the (Fight between supes and Thor).Supes can take Thor it's simple as that the Magic weakness is no biggie nothing Supes hasn't dealt with before.Atleast the Thor and Superman fight was somewhat believable and I accept the outcome of the fight.
Now Kyle got jobbed the worst out of anyone in the damn book.It was a fair trade Thor gets his ass handed and in return Kyle gets his handed to him.

Agreed. At least Thor put up a great fight. DC rigged? We had an elite Green Lantern getting schooled by Wonder Man. 🙄

Originally posted by Validus
Agreed. At least Thor put up a great fight. DC rigged? We had an elite Green Lantern getting schooled by Wonder Man. 🙄

the thor fight against supes was embarrassing. thor, probably marvels greatest hero KOed by a single Punch from superman while he was sitting down. that wasent right.

Originally posted by spideycarnage
the thor fight against supes was embarrassing. thor, probably marvels greatest hero KOed by a single Punch from superman while he was sitting down. that wasent right.

We didn't see the whole fight. They were fighting in between issue 1 and 2 and jumping around between everyone else going at it. Kurt Busiek said he wrote both as holding back so I don't see why everyone complains. You'd think Robin KO'd Thor by the way people talk about it. Two top tiers went at it and one of them lost. Compare that to a star Green Lantern getting chumped by a mid tier brick like Wonder Man.

u do got a pt there, Gl should never lose to wondeman.

Dan Jurgens, writer of both Thor and Superman, has stated Himself Superman could not have won against Thor. Even w/o Mjolnir, it might be a 5/10.

man you fan boys really make no sense in proving superman should lose, you just say it and then throw a random insult, shows your insecurity about your arguement because thor aint winning and sentry would probably be equaled by supes and captain marvel, but because it's two against one and they arent push overs, especially on the same side, they win against the Marvel team 6/10 times. 4/10 for the marvel as they will win one atleast twice and at most 4 times. maybe even 5/10 is even a possibility but i think 6/10 to DC is close to correct.

Originally posted by joesha28
Dan Jurgens, writer of both Thor and Superman, has stated Himself Superman could not have won against Thor. Even w/o Mjolnir, it might be a 5/10.

Without the hammer Supes beats Thor 9/10

Go ask Jurgans.... if one wins it will be a 6/10.

Originally posted by joesha28
Go ask Jurgans.... if one wins it will be a 6/10.

Buddy you sure he wasn't talking about Thor with the hammer.
Be realistic now Supes is stronger,faster,more durable,and just more versatile period.Thor stands no chance without the hammer.

Yes, now. But during the time they made...Superman cld not. But even if you gonna stick to current than, Superman has to meet RKT which he does not stand a chance. But even a Classic Thor will be a match for Supes even with the upgrades. Thor is simply more powerful..while Superman powerset is impressive.

Dan Jurgens, writer of both Thor and Superman, has stated Himself Superman could not have won against Thor. Even w/o Mjolnir, it might be a 5/10.

Kust Busiek who wrote the avengers and is currently writing Superman obviously disagreed with Jurgens when he wrote JLA/Avengers. Busiek wrote Thor exactly the same way he did in his Avengers run. It isn't like it was one big fest of DC bias I saw a lot of fights which were a bit stupid. In the final battle they had Captain Marvel (The marvel one) punching out Black Adam. Now I know that Capatin Marvel is nowhere in Black adams league of strength.

thor/sentry has the victory

Originally posted by S.S
Buddy you sure he wasn't talking about Thor with the hammer.
Be realistic now Supes is stronger,faster,more durable,and just more versatile period.Thor stands no chance without the hammer.

So, if Thor grabs Superman around the throat with the same grip where he tore the Midgard serpent off the earth, then Godblast's Superman, Superman's gonna beat him. Sorry, but that's stretching it.

superman could never withstand a godblast

No, he couldn't. It's brought down more powerful beings than him, and there is no argument against that. Every argument brought against Thor in Thor vs Superman comes down to speed, and there's not a gigantic advantage in close range combat. Fights between Thor and Superman will always come to a hair on these forums because they are evenly matched. Where one is weak, the other is strong. However, if Thor godblasted Superman, Superman would be fried like a grilled cheese sandwich.

Originally posted by Thunderstrike
So, if Thor grabs Superman around the throat with the same grip where he tore the Midgard serpent off the earth, then Godblast's Superman, Superman's gonna beat him. Sorry, but that's stretching it.

That's if he grabs superman which is not gonna happen.Without the Hammer Thor would be lucky to win one fight.With the Hammer Thor would need to use it to it's fullest to win 6/10.
Originally posted by Thunderstrike
No, he couldn't. It's brought down more powerful beings than him, and there is no argument against that. Every argument brought against Thor in Thor vs Superman comes down to speed, and there's not a gigantic advantage in close range combat. Fights between Thor and Superman will always come to a hair on these forums because they are evenly matched. Where one is weak, the other is strong. However, if Thor godblasted Superman, Superman would be fried like a grilled cheese sandwich.

Superman has more then just a speed advantage on Thor.......

No, that's all he has, SS. A speed advantage. He's not stronger. He's not smarter. He doesn't have higher energy projection. His only other bets are intangibility and heat vision against Thor withought his hammer. I was putting a scenario out there. I agree that without Mjolnir he has little chance, but I did give a scenario where he could win.

Originally posted by Thunderstrike
No, that's all he has, SS. A speed advantage. He's not stronger. He's not smarter. He doesn't have higher energy projection. His only other bets are intangibility and heat vision against Thor withought his hammer. I was putting a scenario out there. I agree that without Mjolnir he has little chance, but I did give a scenario where he could win.

Supes is indeed Stronger way more Durable(that you can't argue)Superman is also way Smarter then Thor.
Thor without the Hammer is outclassed with it he barely has the edge.

Stronger - No
Smarter - Mild Mannered Reporter vs a Doctor? I think the doctor wins.
Durable - No.

There isn't anything that Superman has been hit with that Thor can't take. He doesn't have a strength feat more than Thor lifting the World Engine or tearing an entwined Midgard Serpent off the planet. The moon? Last time I checked it was smaller than the Serpent, and Thor pulled it off with little strain.

Actually he is more durable persay as Thor gets cut by Wolvie. Flies through stars.