Originally posted by King_Mungi
Actually yes, because they literally said he was invulnerable and [b]indestructable
1. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v118/Nidaime-Sama/avengers_v1_322_13_rougher.jpgOh yeah, because Puck actually has the power to put him down. You got me. [/B]
those words are just words in comics superman for example hes invulnerable but Kryptonite and magic hurt him now if u look up invulnerable it say something to the effect cant be hurt it does not say cant be hurt unless k and magic are used
the basic meaning of invulnerable is to never be hurt by anything ever so in comics they cant use it to its full meaning or their hero/villian would be compleaty unstopable their has to be exceptions to this word in comics
Originally posted by Grimm22Too bad, he's cut Thanos. Didn't say he could kill Thanos, but he has cut him. It's kind of rediculous to say that Wolverine can cut Hulk, Thanos, but not Puck...PUCK?!? of all people???
Wolverine shouldnt be able to even come close to hurting Thanos or any other cosmic character ❌
Originally posted by Sea King
those words are just words in comics superman for example hes invulnerable but Kryptonite and magic hurt him now if u look up invulnerable it say something to the effect cant be hurt it does not say cant be hurt unless k and magic are usedthe basic meaning of invulnerable is to never be hurt by anything ever so in comics they cant use it to its full meaning or their hero/villian would be compleaty unstopable their has to be exceptions to this word in comics
Except for 30 issues until the end of vol.1 and vol.2 started up there was nothing that hurt him. Physical invulernability is different than being magical influenced, I never claimed Puck was immune to magic so your point is moot.
Originally posted by King_Mungi
No he didn't, good lord you know jack. Wolverine's claws can;t cut Guardian as shown ans stated.
Saying Wolverine can hurt Guardian is like saying that Wolverine can hurt Doom.
Even though Doom is still a hell of a lot more powerful than Guardian, but I wont get into that now 😛
Originally posted by King_Mungi
Except for 30 issues until the end of vol.1 and vol.2 started up there was nothing that hurt him. Physical invulernability is different than being magical influenced, I never claimed Puck was immune to magic so your point is moot.
the way u made your claimes sound were that nothing could ever hurt him witch can not be true or their would be no comic cause it would be boring all u would have is a fight on the frist page and tea and biscuts for the reast of it
Originally posted by riceroost
Too bad, he's cut Thanos. Didn't say he could kill Thanos, but he has cut him. It's kind of rediculous to say that Wolverine can cut Hulk, Thanos, but not Puck...PUCK?!? of all people???
Yeah cuz I mean Thanos being cut by Wolverine is as credible as it gets especially since he didn't have adamantium..............................Plot Induced Retardation as my friend Batdude123 says.
Seriously lets never have another conversation again with Wolverine cutting Thanos again, it ranks in a top 13 of Wolverine retarded writings.
Originally posted by King_MungiAnd Puck being more invulnerable than Thanos is good writing???
No that was bad writing as agreed by majority.
I may not agree with what people say around here about Wolverine, but you can't agree with anyting people say about anyone from Alpha Flight. Sasquatch is unbeatable, Puck is invulnerable to all physical harm, and Wild Child is somehow better than Wolverine.
Originally posted by Sea King
the way u made your claimes sound were that nothing could ever hurt him witch can not be true or their would be no comic cause it would be boring all u would have is a fight on the frist page and tea and biscuts for the reast of it
No by Wolverine, I never said he is invulerable to magic. A person who manipulated molecules could destroy him, but not something Wolverine can do
Originally posted by capt it up
wtf are u talken about and also to say i know jack when your way of base about who I was talken about it just plain un called forI was refearing to thanos and hulk
No, how how many times have I corrected you about Alpha Flight being brainwashed?
Thanos is bad writing, Hulk is fine but he is not indestrucatble.
Originally posted by riceroost
And Puck being more invulnerable than Thanos is good writing???I may not agree with what people say around here about Wolverine, but you can't agree with anyting people say about anyone from Alpha Flight. Sasquatch is unbeatable, Puck is invulnerable to all physical harm, and Wild Child is somehow better than Wolverine.
Tell me where I said that?
When have I said Sasquatch is unbeatable? I can pull of dozens of threads where I stated Sasquatch would lose, and he has been shown to be invulnerable . No I said written correctly he is equal, I didn't say he is better. Maybe you should get your facts straight before you comment.
