Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't think it should be either...it should be a global court deciding what to do with him.
He was Iraqi leader. If any harm was done, it was done to the Iraqi people, who should then bring a decision on what it is to be done with him.
If they agree he should be let go - then so be it.
Re: Re: What should the U.S.A. do eith Sadam Husein
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Funny, I was thinking about starting a poll that read:Tell me what you think the world should do to George Bush?
Kill him
torture him then kill him
i dont care
cut off his tounge and starve him
live his life like a regular prisoner
let him goReally, this is a childish and silly thread.
Good idea! ✅
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
How do you figure that?He was Iraqi leader. If any harm was done, it was done to the Iraqi people, who should then bring a decision on what it is to be done with him.
If they agree he should be let go - then so be it.
I don't know how your Justice System in the UK works, but over here ingermany we don't let the victims decide what happens to the criminals, but a superior neutral instance.
Re: Re: Re: What should the U.S.A. do eith Sadam Husein
Originally posted by SoleranFunny, I was thinking about starting a poll that read:Tell me what you think the world should do to George Bush?
Clearly the only way to torture this man effectively is to make him listen to all his recorded public speechs for the past 10 years over and over again! Then we can see if he thinks he's so funny and witty, huh🙂
You must be including the speeches he made before the move into the White House because he's only been there for 4 and a bit years, right? Also, I'm pretty sure Bush would be intoxicated with exuberance at the sound of his own vebostiy, so it's hardly 'torture' at all...
Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't know how your Justice System in the UK works, but over here ingermany we don't let the victims decide what happens to the criminals, but a superior neutral instance.
Well, I don't know how YOU view justice, but here we recognise a concept called 'legitimate jurisdiction'.
This whole thing about the Iraqis deciding what to do with him- this is not idealism, speculation or opinion.
It's fact! We do NOT have him. The iraqi justice system does.
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
After the Americans beat the shit outta him we should turn him over to the Kurds. Yeah! that would be justice enough.
yes, because the u.s. has the right to torture prisoners who are being held for crimes against humanity which have nothing to do with the u.s.
it just makes sense because WE'RE M'URIKAN!!!!
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Well, I don't know how YOU view justice, but here we recognise a concept called 'legitimate jurisdiction'.This whole thing about the Iraqis deciding what to do with him- this is not idealism, speculation or opinion.
It's fact! We do NOT have him. The iraqi justice system does.
Not really..he is quite outside the justice system.It is a global issue.
Kinda like Nuremberg Trials....just more legitimate...hopefully.
Originally posted by PVS
yes, because the u.s. has the right to torture prisoners who are being held for crimes against humanity which have nothing to do with the u.s.it just makes sense because WE'RE M'URIKAN!!!!
I don't see anything wrong with giving him a taste of his own medicine. In fact! I think during the whole trial they been too nice to him. Kurds should also get a piece of the guy. What? all of sudden you want me to have sympathy for the guy. Get real will ya...
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Well, that is your opinion, but those in power disagree. It is not seen as a global issue, but one for the Iraqi justice system.
He was legitimated by the Iraq system at the time...he shouldn't be judged by Iraq....that's like giving a rape victim a gun and say, do as you please with the rapist.
And yes, that is my opinion....but isn't it yours either...I mean...looking at it, doesn't everyone deserve a fair trial...even Saddam and Goering?
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
all of sudden you want me to have sympathy for the guy.
how does a respect for legality and the geneva convention...and basically the agreed legal principles of all the civilized world a.k.a. NOT torturing prisoners...equate to sympathy for a brutal dictator?
i guess your next question for me will be: "why do you love saddam and hate your freedom?"
fair and balanced.
no spin zone