Originally posted by leonidas
that's what i was getting at. it shouldn't be necessary to prove everything. i guess ultimately the judges would decide for themselves the viability of any new attack form. my point is, just because it HASN'T been done, doesn't mean it CAN'T be done . . . 😖hifty:
Well, I'm a judge, and you pretty much know how I work leo. So long as you, or anyone else in this tournament, can prove an attack feasible, either via a direct scan, or by reasonable deduction via comparable scans and occurences, I'll take it into consideration.
I have a powerful BS filter, however, so be aware.
Originally posted by Blair Wind
seriously speaking:
Digi will you have the list on by 12 tonight?
Dunno. Depends on how tired I am and if I stay up another 45 minutes or so...regardless, it'll be up early-ish tomorrow at the latest.
Technically Val and Scoob know it too. If they're around after midnight they're welcome to post it too.
Oh, and so that everyone knows:
I chose a random member of the signature forum who knew nothing at all about comics or the tournament to determine matchups. If anyone wants, I can release his/her name so that they can verify that they chose the matchups and there wasn't any bias on my part involved in the process. But I'd rather not do that unless I absolutely need to....don't want to burden that person unless it's absolutely necessary.
But honestly, I have no reason to cheat...and also no way of knowing how the matches would turn out. So that shouldn't be an issue.