Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hey leo? This is the sort of thing you'll bring up if you fight GF. In the meantime, leave it to his opponents to come up with this stuff. 😉And as for sun-dipped Cyborg, the judges can decide for themselves on anything like this.
oops. my bad. 😮 i thought we could question stuff like this . . .? no? i'm still part of the public voting and i just want to know if this was a legal tactic. didn't mean to be inappropriate.
Originally posted by leonidas
oops. my bad. 😮 i thought we could question stuff like this . . .? no? i'm still part of the public voting and i just want to know if this was a legal tactic. didn't mean to be inappropriate.
Somewhere in between is best. You can harbor doubts about stuff like that and use that to influence your vote. But at the same time, we don't want to offer up counter-arguments to opponents who might not have thought of it otherwise.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Somewhere in between is best. You can harbor doubts about stuff like that and use that to influence your vote. But at the same time, we don't want to offer up counter-arguments to opponents who might not have thought of it otherwise.
what if someone is lying or simply selling a load of bull in hopes of not getting caught? fir instance, if i knew wolverine couldn't shoot energy blasts, but the combatant SAYS wolverine shoots robin with an energy blast and no one else questions it or appears to KNOW wolvie can't shoot energy blasts, am i supposed to simply let it go? that's sort of what i was questioning in gf's post.
Originally posted by leonidas
what if someone is lying or simply selling a load of bull in hopes of not getting caught? fir instance, if i knew wolverine couldn't shoot energy blasts, but the combatant SAYS wolverine shoots robin with an energy blast and no one else questions it or appears to KNOW wolvie can't shoot energy blasts, am i supposed to simply let it go? that's sort of what i was questioning in gf's post.
😆
Or that a certain god shouldnt be able to control a certain person? 🙄
eh, I say leave it be. Its up to the other person to come up with a retort. If they arnt prepared with knowledge its either their fault for not looking it up....or the person they are facing is SOOOO obscure no one knows a crap about...and the ones that do dont want to say a word disgust <- in that case....pms are welcome 😖hifty:
so, i've got ANOTHER question:
we see clearly aw's strategy is to have quasar take out gladiator while hyperion tackles orion. now, what if in THEIR opening startegy, dl/shv decide they wanted ORION to tackle quasar and they built their entire strategy and premise and everything around THAT scenario then they rpesent it -- whose scenario do we follow? is one of the teams expected to adapt to the other's strategy? is the first one posted the scenario that must be followed? what if NEITHER adopts the other's strategy or even acknowledges it but simply goes about following their own plans? 😕
Originally posted by leonidas
so, i've got ANOTHER question:we see clearly aw's strategy is to have quasar take out gladiator while hyperion tackles orion. now, what if in THEIR opening startegy, dl/shv decide they wanted ORION to tackle quasar and they built their entire strategy and premise and everything around THAT scenario then they rpesent it -- whose scenario do we follow? is one of the teams expected to adapt to the other's strategy? is the first one posted the scenario that must be followed? what if NEITHER adopts the other's strategy or even acknowledges it but simply goes about following their own plans? 😕
Sweetie it just started and so far only on person posted. Wait to see how things play out. ✅
Originally posted by leonidas
so, i've got ANOTHER question:we see clearly aw's strategy is to have quasar take out gladiator while hyperion tackles orion. now, what if in THEIR opening startegy, dl/shv decide they wanted ORION to tackle quasar and they built their entire strategy and premise and everything around THAT scenario then they rpesent it -- whose scenario do we follow? is one of the teams expected to adapt to the other's strategy? is the first one posted the scenario that must be followed? what if NEITHER adopts the other's strategy or even acknowledges it but simply goes about following their own plans? 😕
If they continue to post opposing strategies then just evaluate them seperately and decide for yourself which is more likely....
Hopefully, though, they'll post a strategy for every possible matchup (it's only 3 strategies per character on your team - 9 total... they don't have to be essays, just a few lines)
While doing this they should continue to promote the tactic that they feel is their surest way to victory
Originally posted by leonidas
so, i've got ANOTHER question:we see clearly aw's strategy is to have quasar take out gladiator while hyperion tackles orion. now, what if in THEIR opening startegy, dl/shv decide they wanted ORION to tackle quasar and they built their entire strategy and premise and everything around THAT scenario then they rpesent it -- whose scenario do we follow? is one of the teams expected to adapt to the other's strategy? is the first one posted the scenario that must be followed? what if NEITHER adopts the other's strategy or even acknowledges it but simply goes about following their own plans? 😕