yeh, he's a scout, tracker who fights dwarves and fairies not a true warrior capable of full on battle.
you want a killer, fighter, warrior there is only one branch who stares you in the eyes when he kills you and doesnt stab you in the back in order to kill a sissy incompetent moron using stealth or just taking recon pictures..
obviously you never compared physical training and qualifications that sets a marine apart from a soldier. the special ops training given to some ranger units is barely equal to what an average marine receive and is required for them to be considered marines..
if you dont believe me go join both branches and get back to me in 4 to 6 years if you take the half time contract whatever it is called🙄
JwGzbkgrZsQ&feature=related
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, no. He's been in a "full on battle", a couple of them.LoL, talk about propaganda and hype. Marines are little more than regular army personal, just a different branch. Common grunts.
They're a department of the Navy. The Army has many fields, but the Marine Corps is all about combat. They're probably the proudest of the five branches, but not without good reason. They're not "regular", that's for sure.
Originally posted by Quiero Motathank you for that.. you are truly wise. cry
They're a department of the Navy. The Army has many fields, but the Marine Corps is all about combat. They're probably the proudest of the five branches, but not without good reason. They're not "regular", that's for sure.
have you seen some of the army quotes about what they think about the Marines?
http://oldcorps.org/USMC/quotes.html
usaflag
YOf0XgGaTrA&playnext=1&list=PL31608753F932B740
by the way rubtart you are right some of it is propaganda but not all of it and it came about and remained for a very good reason.
now i am more than willing to admit that there are nasty marines that shouldnt wear the uniform who dont represent the standards of the corps but it is less prevalent than the other branches.
AClpk0xM1A8&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvzFh2_KBk0
The few, the proud.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvzFh2_KBk0The few, the proud.
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm not buying the Marine bad-assery myth though.
It's not really a myth when you can look it up in any history book.
I don't think I need to list the various battles throughout history in which the USMC completely (to use modern Internet parlance) "pwned" the enemy.
Originally posted by King Castle
have you seen some of the army quotes about what they think about the Marines?
I used to be in the Army and so I know there's always been a rivalry. But some of the more fanatic ones get carried away.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvzFh2_KBk0The few, the proud.
I hope their C.O. doesn't see that. The only more concrete evidence of troops violating DATD would be a full-on gay sex tape.
I just wrote that it's according National Geographic and the Military Channel. So one piece of evidence comes from a source that is not 'propaganda' as some in here called it. When a candidate graduates from Ranger school, he is not told until that day. How does he find out? His name is called awarding him the title of Ranger and the coveted symbol (patch). The 75th Ranger Regiment is the best trained and disciplined unit in the world.
Not to insult, the invincible Marine Corp is a myth and fallacy. Sure they may be bad ass in Afghanistan, but the really really 'impossible' assignments go to the Rangers. Tora Bora was no walk in the park. Continious air strikes and fire fights between Rangers. The Taliban and al Qaeda fighters should have stopped NATO cold, but the Rangers kicked them. Over FOUR HUNDRED enemy killed what the official report was, but it is believed that the actual total was around 1,000.
Now tell me, how can facts be propaganda?
Happy St. Patricks Day!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDwlGbEcJ6Y
I have been a SEAL on seal team 2 for only 3 years I am 20 years old. My team has been on several training missions with both the British and australian SAS. I have a lot of respect for all of the men in the SAS but I have to say the delta force has got the edge. I got two buddies over in delta one of them being my bestfriend from high school. Although I can't give away any information about delta I can say that from what I know delta is one of the most elite military forces on the planet. He will be going to green team with me in a week to try to make it to our dream team, SEAL team six a.k.a DEVGRU. This is off topic but SEAL team six vs Delta Force what do you think? Also whoever said the SAS has the hardest training on the planet you must be mistaking the SAS for the SEALs
Originally posted by MichaelTeam2You went straight into the SEALS?
I have been a SEAL on seal team 2 for only 3 years I am 20 years old. My team has been on several training missions with both the British and australian SAS. I have a lot of respect for all of the men in the SAS but I have to say the delta force has got the edge. I got two buddies over in delta one of them being my bestfriend from high school. Although I can't give away any information about delta I can say that from what I know delta is one of the most elite military forces on the planet. He will be going to green team with me in a week to try to make it to our dream team, SEAL team six a.k.a DEVGRU. This is off topic but SEAL team six vs Delta Force what do you think? Also whoever said the SAS has the hardest training on the planet you must be mistaking the SAS for the SEALs
Do you train with MARSOC?
After highschool I enlisted straight into BUD/s. I probably should have went to college and entered an officer but I couldn't wait. The first day was the worst because I thought I knew what was coming because I watched all the tv shows of navy SEAL training and I read just about every book but it was much different when I was there. After a while I got used to the training and the physical demands and I think thats exactly what those instructors wanted us to do. Before hell week we thought we would be able to make it through easy but during that first night of hell week 6 men dropped out.
Now about MARSOC I have only trained with them three times so far the first time was during a mission where we were taught basic surveillance skills and target identification. The second time they came to our base and used our target ranges with us and trained in our CQB compound. We taught them how to clear rooms and deal with hostage situations. And my third time was an optional course where a select group of SEALs were aloud to go through the selection process for the marine force recon. I don't have too much training experience with American special operations because SEAL team two specializes in arctic warfare I've trained with special operations around the world that fight in much colder climates. I have completed 23 missions so far which is much more than I expected and every single one of those missions I brought a pack of hand warmers with me.
Originally posted by MichaelTeam2I was in the SAS for 10 years, and the SEALS for 6. The SAS is way totally harder.
I have been a SEAL on seal team 2 for only 3 years I am 20 years old. My team has been on several training missions with both the British and australian SAS. I have a lot of respect for all of the men in the SAS but I have to say the delta force has got the edge. I got two buddies over in delta one of them being my bestfriend from high school. Although I can't give away any information about delta I can say that from what I know delta is one of the most elite military forces on the planet. He will be going to green team with me in a week to try to make it to our dream team, SEAL team six a.k.a DEVGRU. This is off topic but SEAL team six vs Delta Force what do you think? Also whoever said the SAS has the hardest training on the planet you must be mistaking the SAS for the SEALs
Not as hard being a Yeoman though. That's some intense shit there, my nig.