Which comic character was the most depowered in a movie?

Started by capt it up10 pages

Originally posted by batdude123
I think it's safe to say that X3 Wolverine was more powerful than the X1 and X2 versions of him. In X3:

He turned the Sentinel to scrap metal when Colossus used the fastball special.

He was swatting away Spike's shards like they were nothing.

His healing factor was like ten times faster.

His fighting skills were better. (Ex: The forest scene and the final scene at Alcatraz)


yes he was better then before, but still horriably done

Originally posted by capt it up
you do not read a lot of wolverine do you?

I do...I just disagree as to how powerful they take his mutation to be....or that he goes against people he has no business going against and winning.

Originally posted by Blair Wind
I do...I just disagree as to how powerful they take his mutation to be....or that he goes against people he has no business going against and winning.

mutations mutate and become stronger it is evolution.

also he been doing it since he came out so it your option and all, but that does not stop the fact that MOVIE wolverine sucks next to comic wolverine and would get stomped easiliy.

Originally posted by complexbrother
Iceman

Thing

Dr. Strange

Phonix


dr strange?

Originally posted by bigbran
thing he had trouble lifting a car

Meh , if were going by Marvel this was things first appearance , he only started off at five tons.

dc strange?

Originally posted by bigbran
dr strange?

It was a 1978 made for TV movie. (CBS)

is there a site to get it.

Originally posted by bigbran
dr strange?

Yea man, there were this god awful Dr. Strange telefilm movie that aired in the early 80s (1980)

Originally posted by grey fox
Meh , if were going by Marvel this was things first appearance , he only started off at five tons.

Yeah, I was going to say that 😬

I can deal with it for one movie, but for the sequal I expect a better Thing suit (rocky this time, not lumpy) plus some better strength feats.

Oh course when its not CGI like Hulk its a LOT harder to do 😐

Originally posted by Inhuman
Bats was overpowered. I dont care whats its made of or how snug or light it was. All batman movie suits looks heavy as hell for him to have that much mobility. 😉

In the original movies Batman was crap. I hated them, they were horrible.

Damn you Tim Burton! 😠

Dont even get me started on Joel Schumer.

Current Movie Bats is much more realistic, although we didnt see much of a detective side of him in Batman Begins 😬

Oh course it was an origin movie so its ok 😄

Originally posted by capt it up
mutations mutate and become stronger it is evolution.

also he been doing it since he came out so it your option and all, but that does not stop the fact that MOVIE wolverine sucks next to comic wolverine and would get stomped easiliy.

What movie version would beat a comic version? 😐

Originally posted by Grimm22
In the original movies Batman was crap. I hated them, they were horrible.

Damn you Tim Burton! 😠

Dont even get me started on Joel Schumer.

Current Movie Bats is much more realistic, although we didnt see much of a detective side of him in Batman Begins 😬

Oh course it was an origin movie so its ok 😄

Your buggin, Batman was good but Returns, Forever, and batman and Robin were garbage. Jack Nicholson was the best Joker and I doubt the new one will top him.

All of them, no one in the movies has had any feats comparable to their comic selves

Originally posted by Big Sexy
Your buggin, Batman was good but Returns, Forever, and batman and Robin were garbage. Jack Nicholson was the best Joker and I doubt the new one will top him.

Nicholson was decent at best.

How could you like that awful movie! 😠

Seriously the special effects were awful.

The story was awful.

The acting was awful.

There is absolutly nothing Batman about that movie ❌

I actually didn't mind Batman (Keaton) or Batman Returns (Kilmer). I agree that Batman Begins (Bale) was the best by far though.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Nicholson was decent at best.

How could you like that awful movie! 😠

Seriously the special effects were awful.

The story was awful.

The acting was awful.

There is absolutly nothing Batman about that movie ❌

Whatever dude, I liked it and I am pretty sure I'm not the only one. And as far as realistic Please dude, tell me whats realistic about a guy that knows 127 styles, has billions of dollars worth of equipment, can kick through trees, and balances a life as a million dollar playboy and a crusader.
And Christian nolan needed work on his Batman especially that scene where he was trying to scare the cop, please, that scenes acting was on par with Wesley Snipes screaming over whistlers death in Blade trilogy.

Dont get me wrong, I do think that begins was the best of them but Batman was by no means a bad movie. And speaking of bad acting, lets not even talk about Katie Holmes.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Nicholson was decent at best.

How could you like that awful movie! 😠

Seriously the special effects were awful.

The story was awful.

The acting was awful.

There is absolutly nothing Batman about that movie ❌

Dude Nicholson had Joker down. I am waiting to see who they choose but those are some big shoes to fill. And the scene where he pulls the big gun out of his pants is classic.

I just read the whole Wolverine getting KO'd by bullet in the head...It is strange for me coz in v3 #39 - He gets a Sniper bullet in the head and he is not down...

And in the same issue after being stabbed with a knife he is still full power but when he gets 2 shots in the chest he is KO...

So it's really not a big thing that he is KO.d in the X-Men 2....

Even though some people don't believe it. Wolverine can be taken down or out...