For Christians, is the Bible infallible?

Oops I meant the second quote to be for Boris's comment about the Tyre. He is welcome to try and use to prove the Bible as "bullshit". Truth is that he won't be able to because it doesn't and he lacks the knowledge and reasoning to make it so even if it did.

No, prophecies haven't been proven false at all. You just discredited yourself. I don't use links ever to back my points because there is no need to. Not once can I remember doing so, so you can forget that ridiculous assumption.

You miss the entire point. That's okay, I don't really care, I get bored with this crap anyways.

Originally posted by Nellinator
Oops I meant the second quote to be for Boris's comment about the Tyre. He is welcome to try and use to prove the Bible as "bullshit". Truth is that he won't be able to because it doesn't and he lacks the knowledge and reasoning to make it so even if it did.

No, prophecies haven't been proven false at all. You just discredited yourself. I don't use links ever to back my points because there is no need to. Not once can I remember doing so, so you can forget that ridiculous assumption.

You miss the entire point. That's okay, I don't really care, I get bored with this crap anyways.

oh ho ho ho. how VERY deluded you are. the bible has thousands of contradictions. i.e VERIFYABLE contradiction which can be substantiated by teslar calculus too, just so theres no ambiguity and problem with interpretation. it is a book RIFE with fallacies and any1 who isnt deluded by faith can see this. i havent discredited myself at all, im just astounded at how blind and flasely full of confidence you are. and anyway, YOU missed the entire point, and didnt provide anything that you claimed before{and somewhat ridiculed my post for} you have not provided any evidence outside the bible or links{i wasnt saying YOU post those links, im saying the only evidence ive heard from outside the bible, supposedly, is from JIA'S links, which are false, and was telling you not to use those as outside of bible, support} posted by jia, that tells one that the writers of the bible and jesus himself was IDENTIFYABLY inspired by GOD. but then again, i wasnt holding my breath, and you didnt deliver.

conclusion, the only "proof" of divine inspiration is in the bible itself and that makes the argument circular and unjustified.

Originally posted by Nellinator
Oops I meant the second quote to be for Boris's comment about the Tyre. He is welcome to try and use to prove the Bible as "bullshit". Truth is that he won't be able to because it doesn't and he lacks the knowledge and reasoning to make it so even if it did.

No, prophecies haven't been proven false at all.

The prophecy says that Nebuchadnezzar will destroy the city of Tyre and it will never be rebuilt, yet the city of Tyre exists today.

There we go, Bible = Bullshit.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
oh ho ho ho. how VERY deluded you are. the bible has thousands of contradictions. i.e VERIFYABLE contradiction which can be substantiated by teslar calculus too, just so theres no ambiguity and problem with interpretation. it is a book RIFE with fallacies and any1 who isnt deluded by faith can see this. i havent discredited myself at all, im just astounded at how blind and flasely full of confidence you are. and anyway, YOU missed the entire point, and didnt provide anything that you claimed before{and somewhat ridiculed my post for} you have not provided any evidence outside the bible or links{i wasnt saying YOU post those links, im saying the only evidence ive heard from outside the bible, supposedly, is from JIA'S links, which are false, and was telling you not to use those as outside of bible, support} posted by jia, that tells one that the writers of the bible and jesus himself was IDENTIFYABLY inspired by GOD. but then again, i wasnt holding my breath, and you didnt deliver.

conclusion, the only "proof" of divine inspiration is in the bible itself and that makes the argument circular and unjustified.

And no there aren't contradictions. I have yet to see a contradiction that hasn't been debunked. The thing is that 99% of perceived contradictions come from the KJV translation. Also, there is a big difference between exceptions and contradictions. But hey, I'm still waiting for an example of true contradiction. But besides that you don't actually know my beliefs on Biblical inerrancy, so you really are talking to a blank wall. Once again, that's okay with me.

Your conclusion is irrelevant to everything I said.

Originally posted by Boris
The prophecy says that Nebuchadnezzar will destroy the city of Tyre and it will never be rebuilt, yet the city of Tyre exists today.

There we go, Bible = Bullshit.

Originally posted by Nellinator
I'm still waiting for you to bring up a valid point.

I am still waiting for you to refute the arguments of others. Simply stating that an argument is not valid or sound is not a refutation.

Originally posted by Nellinator
I'm still waiting for you to bring up a valid point. You see, if you read the entire passage and then do some research you will see that this has been addressed before.

(Ezek 26:14) I will make you a bare rock; you shall be a place for spreading nets. You shall never again be rebuilt, for I the LORD have spoken, says the Lord GOD.

Crazy fool! He shouldn't have said that eh?

So God said this, so God is wrong.. but God doesn't exist, so God isn't wrong! The Bible does exsit, so the Bible is infact WRONG!

Awesome thing is that mainland Tyre which is blatantly it was referring to because of the gates and whatnot. It was actually leveled and hasn't bee rebuilt. The Tyre that stands today is on an island just out from the original city where the people retreated. Play again.

Hahah clutching at straws man, it's in the Bible, the city of Tyre will be destroyed and never rebuilt, the city of tyre exists today.

There is no way you can get around it, the bible is wrong.

Originally posted by Nellinator
You are still missing the point. You don't see that, that's still okay. I'll leave you to think.

And no there aren't contradictions. I have yet to see a contradiction that hasn't been debunked. The thing is that 99% of perceived contradictions come from the KJV translation. Also, there is a big difference between exceptions and contradictions. But hey, I'm still waiting for an example of true contradiction. But besides that you don't actually know my beliefs on Biblical inerrancy, so you really are talking to a blank wall. Once again, that's okay with me.

Your conclusion is irrelevant to everything I said.

I'm still waiting for you to bring up a valid point. You see, if you read the entire passage and then do some research you will see that this has been addressed before.

yes there are, verifyably thousands. not just from the new internation or king james version but from the original greek one too. as i said, they can even be verified by teslar calculus. uve been given examples, but as always, ull dodge. and yes my conclusion would be irrellevant to a BRICK WALL.

Wow, you can't read can you? Tyre, the section known as Ushu that was prophecied again was destroyed and removed to an island where it exists today. There is nothing where Ushu used to stand.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
yes there are, verifyably thousands. not just from the new internation or king james version but from the original greek one too. as i said, they can even be verified by teslar calculus. uve been given examples, but as always, ull dodge. and yes my conclusion would be irrellevant to a BRICK WALL.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
yes there are, verifyably thousands. not just from the new internation or king james version but from the original greek one too. as i said, they can even be verified by teslar calculus. uve been given examples, but as always, ull dodge. and yes my conclusion would be irrellevant to a BRICK WALL.

Forget about him nellinator, he does this on Comic Bookd forums. Just ignore him, it's a better relief than argueing with somebody that can't comperhand 😉.

Keep it up man 👆

Originally posted by Nellinator
Wow, you can't read can you? Tyre, the section known as Ushu that was prophecied again was destroyed and removed to an island where it exists today. There is nothing where Ushu used to stand.

Alas we are talking about Tyre, not Ushu, the bible mentions Tyre.

Even Ezekiel knew he was wrong, "Mortal, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon made his army labor hard against Tyre; every head was made bald and every shoulder was rubbed bare; yet neither he nor his army got anything from Tyre to pay for the labor that he had expended against it... bla, bla, bla.

More incorrect prophecies: Daniel incorrectly states that in the third year of the reign of King Jehoiakim, Nebuchadnezzar will conquer Judah.

It was in 597 BCE that Nebuchadnezzar takes Jerusalem, by then Jehoiakim had died.

Wrong again! Zomg!

Do you know Hebrew? Didn't think so.

Ushu was the main center of Tyre and contained the palaces and army stations. It is destroyed. Read the Ezekiel passage and you'll see it talking about the isles shaking at the fall. This is blatantly referring to the island that is now Tyre shuttering at the fall of the Ushu. Thanks for playing.

Research it and you'll find out that this has also been reconciled.

Originally posted by the Darkone
Forget about him nellinator, he does this on Comic Bookd forums. Just ignore him, it's a better relief than argueing with somebody that can't comperhand 😉.

Keep it up man 👆

LMFAO, says the dumass who cant produce one single line of argument. and now i understand why, UR ALSO A CHRISTIAN.

problem, the new testament want completely recorded in hebrew, it was more greek.

The passage he's talking about is Old Testament, however, and written in Hebrew. But, yes the majority of the NT was written in Greek. Only Matthew wasn't as far I know.

No, the bible is not infallable. Who believes This? God is infallable, not the Bible.