no god

If you ask me the true proof that god exists is that there couldnt be existince without god 😐

Are you making a hypocritical statement or mocking one?

Originally posted by Regret
If I remember correctly Big Bang theory is a circular theory.

kinda like this

start with a compact matter

*and it expands out
**
***
****
*****
******once it reaches some point of expansion it collapses
*****
****
***
**
* and then starts over
**
***
****
*****

Given this, a beginning would be impossible to find.

How is it possible that it's a circular theory if there was only one big bang and our universe is expanding rapidly instead of shrinking.

Like this

BOOM!
*and it expands out
**
***
**** <- you are here
*****
******once it reaches some final point of expansion it collapses
*****
****
***
**
* and then starts over
BOOM!
*
**
***
****
*****....etc.

lol. Great effects. But after all, it's just a theory..

Theory thank you.

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
lol. Great effects. But after all, it's just a theory..

And what is wrong with a theory?

Originally posted by Alliance
Theory thank you.

Originally posted by Alliance

Quoting yourself? 🙄 😆

Restating a point 😄

Originally posted by Alliance
Restating a point 😄

A theory is all we can ever have in a world where you can never completely know anything, unless you have a book that says differently. 😆

the scientifically ignorant need its official capitalization. I'm personally lax about it, but some people confuse "scientific theory" with "cockamanie theory".

Thus I must be archaic and bring back the caps.

Originally posted by Alliance
the scientifically ignorant need its official capitalization. I'm personally lax about it, but some people confuse "scientific theory" with "cockamanie theory".

Thus I must be archaic and bring back the caps.

What's the difference? Over time there have been theories that started off to make sense, but later just became cockamamie. Also, plenty of theories that sounded cockamamie at first, but are now almost law.

Its called evidence....thats the difference.

Originally posted by Alliance
Its called evidence....thats the difference.

I would say that it's the process the allows new evidence to come to light. Some religions (Christianity for example) are incompatible with that kind of thinking

Correction: Some religious people are incompatable with that kind of thinking.

Originally posted by Alliance
Correction: Some religious people are incompatable with that kind of thinking.

🙄 Religions are people.

The bag bang starts.
We cant even ask how long it has been there-whether it has just lately popped into being.
In less than one minute, the universe is a million billion miles across. There is a extreme amount of heat, 10 billion degrees of it.
As the universe cools and expands, more elements get created from stars.
Many scientists say that the universe does not contain enough mass, enough gravitational force to stop expansion, the universe becomes cold and forever expanding.
On top of that, there is the posibility that there are infinite "big bangs", each universe in a different dimention, each universe with different physics. New universes, being created every second.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
🙄 Religions are people.

No. Religions are comprized of people, followed by people. Religions are institutions.

Originally posted by The thinker
We cant even ask how long it has been there-whether it has just lately popped into being.

Originally posted by The thinker
Many scientists say that the universe does not contain enough mass, enough gravitational force to stop expansion, the universe becomes cold and forever expanding.