Originally posted by Cosmic FlameYes it does. Otherwise you can just label anyone who's powerful an Omega.
Actually, the only thing that qualifies one as an omega is one's power, not what one is called. Just because Jean or Bobby or Quentin weren't called omegas on panel doesn't mean they weren't omegas until they were called such.
The writers decide who's what. Not the readers.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Yes it does. Otherwise you can just label anyone who's powerful an Omega.The writers decide who's what. Not the readers.
Marvel writers say (on multiple occasions) that Rachel has virtually unlimited potential, which is the definition Xavier used for omega.
Marvel writers say that Rachel inherited her mother's psionic potential (who is a confirmed omega).
Marvel writers say that it is the province of omega psis to host the PF, which Rachel has.
Yet Rachel isn't an omega, despite having unlimited potential, inheriting her mother's omega power and hosting a force that is the ultimate power of omega psis, right?
But it's up to the writers to decide...
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Yes it does. Otherwise you can just label anyone who's powerful an Omega.The writers decide who's what. Not the readers.
Not really. There are a lot of characters who have either shown a whole lot of power and potential (Magneto, Scarlet Witch, Exodus, Rachel Summers), or who particular people seem to really want to be omega mutants (Storm, Rachel Summers), but haven't been called omega mutants and so aren't. It's really that simple. Thing is, it is a title, nothing more.
Unless they're labelled on panel or in a handbook, they aren't. The title really hasn't enabled anything in the comics. Those who've been given the title with the exception of Iceman and Jean Grey for the most part haven't been shown to have that much power or potential for power development. Elixir shorted himself out trying to harm people with his powers. Vulcan flew off into space. Mr M is dead.