Could Sion have possibly replicated Sidious' Force Storm?

Read the first post dumbass.

Why? You get enough ridicule, you want some more?

Please don't post in my thread td. Unless you want to provide a valid argument, GTFO. Oh wait, that's right, I forgot. You're not original. This is a brand new topic, and thus there are no arguments for you to copy.

Considering the fact that I don't copy arguments and that you've been ridiculed in your own thread which you call an 'argument', I guess my post stands..

Well you seem to be copying all of td's arguments (unless you really are him) who in turn copied all of his arguments off of the antediluvians.

Considering the fact that I haven't read any of 'tds' arguments, I fail to see how I'm copying him or anybody.. But I forgot, in your world 2-3 people CANNOT have the same argument. Silly me!

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Considering the fact that I haven't read any of 'tds' arguments, I fail to see how I'm copying him or anybody.. But I forgot, in your world 2-3 people CANNOT have the same argument. Silly me!

No, that can happen. However not with dumbass arguments like Nihilus can eat force attacks.

Originally posted by GM Nebaris
No, that can happen. However not with dumbass arguments like Nihilus can eat force attacks.

Uh, in Sexy's defense, there's been several - like a hell of a more than just three - that think Nihilus can consume Force attacks. Check out this this thread. And no doubt there's more than that.

Just Avis in that thread Mokoto.

The point was: more than one person share that supposed "dumbass opinion". There's several others too, as I've pointed out, and from the two Nihilus threads I've bothered to look at the list is:

1.) tdtd.
2.) Darth Sexy.
3.) Avis.
4.) kamikz ("Also, Nihilus just sucks the force out of her, even if she pulls a force attack of it will be drained by Nihilus.").
5.) truejedi ("yes, maybe he eats the force, but he isn't that powerful" - agreeing with a point Avis made about Nihilus absorbing attacks).

But whatever, I could care less really. Nihilus (or KOTOR for that matter) isn't my forte of debating.

Well I was kind of exaggerating. I still think it's a stupid idea.

Thank you Sama. At least one person has common sense here.

i dont think sion has more anger and control, he just exercises his will in a different more overt way. you have you remember how much sidious hate the jedi, and how many times he has to sit with them face to face pretending to value their opinion, and need their help. i dont think any other sith could have had the control to do that for decades. and his anger, like his power was all controlled for the greater purpose.

but wasn't sion's entire purpose to destroy the remains of the jedi? he lets kreia live even though he knows that she was a jedi. He even calls her master and the entire reason she's alive is to annihilate the jedi teachings

Hey Decay, I give you props for that post man. So far, he has been the only person to actually read through my first post and directly answer my question. Everyone else has simply stated that Sidious has more raw power, therefor no.

Well, Nebaris, the fact is that Sion has never used a force storm, so we cant assume he would be able to do it in a combat situation.

What you have been arguing, appears to be, 'Sion could of possibly had the *potential* to use force storms'. I wont deny the possibility, but that statement has no real use in a debate because it is unverifiable...sort of like speculating that Anakin at full potential could defeat any opponent.

Not so much the potential, but the capabilities to do so given he had the right knowledge.

Originally posted by GM Nebaris
Not so much the potential, but the capabilities to do so given he had the right knowledge.

In other words....potential. However if I used your logic, then the book of anger says nothing about knowledge. According to your logic he should of been able to do it in KOTOR, only he never does. Which leads me to believe he cannot.

You should drop your argument, all you are arguing is a remote possibility that is not backed by any evidence other than your completely literal interpretation of the book of anger.

What are you talking about? There is a difference between having the potential to do something, and having the capabilities. And obviously knowledge is a requirement. Why do you thing Palpatine continuously states 'I have learnt', as in it was something with which knowledge was needed to be learnt.

Originally posted by jollyjim311
No.

I agree.