Originally posted by PVS
as she would have to present a credible source to prove her point. if she's more educated on the matter than its just that much easier for her to reference. in fact i would say, being the more educated, she has more of an obligation to educate others. unless of coarse a debate is not really an exchange of ideas but just a quest to see who's dick diploma is bigger.
She does not hold the burden of proof. The one disputing her claims does. She does not need to present the source unless a credible attack is made, unless she chooses to do so.
As far as educating others goes, in situations as we describe the uneducated is typically saying that the educated doesn't know what they are talking about and are not interested in the sources. Typical response to sources presented is an attack at the credibility of the sources, not an open minded researching of the source.
The uneducated typically do feel that the educated are only on "a quest to see who's dick diploma is bigger."
Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, it would, but not because she has a degree but because she is actually knowledgable.It's that way with everyone....that's why educated obviously trumps uneducated but jsut having a degree doesn't mean you will be more educated than anyone else that doesn't have an agree. And you have to provide your points and not jsut say "NO, I have a degree, I'm right".
A degree is proof of years of study in a subject. It is evidence of her education. It typically does mean you will be more educated than anyone else that doesn't have a degree in that area. The degree does support their statements until they are credibly refuted.