Originally posted by PVS
prove what? we're talking about the makings of a functional debate, not bannable offenses. you're free to abuse freedom of speech and be an idiot. doesnt make it right, just because its not addressed in forum rules...........wtf point are you trying to make?
That it is just your opinion. Someone could say that there are no idiotic debating tactics, and you could never disprove it.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That it is just your opinion. Someone could say that there are no idiotic debating tactics, and you could never disprove it.
Well, without a doubt, this is what we (and a generally consensus of intellectual people) regard as idiotic debating tactics. ´
Leave the doubting of everything to people who actually can pull the trick, m'kay?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, without a doubt, this is what we (and a generally consensus of intellectual people) regard as idiotic debating tactics. ´Leave the doubting of everything to people who actually can pull the trick, m'kay?
You are making no sense. Unless you are trying to attach me personally.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are making no sense. Unless you are trying to attach me personally.
It is very unsatisfying to argue with you, since you jsut dodge every argument..or change the topic midair. Anyways. Now where you graduated from is important to determine the respect you deserve, but what you actually think, say and do. That'S the Bottom Line.
IMO
Originally posted by Bardock42
It is very unsatisfying to argue with you, since you jsut dodge every argument..or change the topic midair. Anyways. Now where you graduated from is important to determine the respect you deserve, but what you actually think, say and do. That'S the Bottom Line.IMO
Then don't respond.
Originally posted by PVS
although you dodge all points, you are feeding this topic....its an odd circumstance.........evidence by example......i guess...go with it 😕
I did not dodge your question. I did dodge Bardock's question, but he does not care about the question, just attaching me. Is that your problem also?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I did not dodge your question. I did dodge Bardock's question, but he does not care about the question, just attaching me. Is that your problem also?
since this is a discussion, it is the problem of all who participate. so...yes it is. and maybe you should try detatching him.
Originally posted by PVS
since this is a discussion, it is the problem of all who participate. so...yes it is. and maybe you should try detatching him.
I'm open to suggestions. He does this to me all the time. I was trying to come into the conversation with the idea that we must have established rules to know what we are talking about, but I got derailed before I got a chance to find the right angle.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm open to suggestions. He does this to me all the time. I was trying to come into the conversation with the idea that we must have established rules to know what we are talking about, but I got derailed before I got a chance to find the right angle.
we cant have established rules. all we can do is plea for common courtesy. that plea would be to not cast logic aside for the sake of 'winning' a.k.a. just shutting your opponent up. the exagerated scenario:
poster 1: i'm right and here's why *presents evidence*
poster 2: *shoots poster 1 dead* "HA!!! i win"
Originally posted by PVS
we cant have established rules. all we can do is plea for common courtesy. that plea would be to not cast logic aside for the sake of 'winning' a.k.a. just shutting your opponent up. the exagerated scenario:poster 1: i'm right and here's why *presents evidence*
poster 2: *shoots poster 1 dead* "HA!!! i win"
I agree with your primus in this thread. I was trying to interject about what Regret was saying.