Idiotic Debating Tactics

that reminds me

IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134:

if your opponent has gained the upper hand in a thread, bend him over and anally rape him into submission. this may lead to a weak and resigned whimper and then a terrified silence

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
woah, woah, woah, what just happened here ?

BACK IN TOPIC!!!!

Who uses the "Bullshitting" method? 😄

this entire thread consists of various tactics involving bullshit and horseshit. i (we) was attemting to categorise whatever fallacies exist which are not covered by the all-too-exploited and copy/pasted logical fallacies list which is well known (but not as much as it should be.)

diced up and quoted from another thread, since i feel it certainly is an idiotic debating tactic: coded speak a.k.a. blowing smoke up your ass a.k.a. feigned empathy/reasoning

-I'm sure not all homosexuals are peadophiles, but you cant deny that when a man rapes a little boy, he's a homosexual. (homosexuality and peadophilia are directly linked)

-many people died during ww2, jews were a fraction. im not denying that many were killed. (the jews were never systematically killed, they were just casualties of war)

-many blacks are decent people, but just look at them all looting and killing after katrina. they were out of control and i support the decision to shoot first and ask questions later. (black people who are not obedient should be executed on site)

...coded speak...a tool which allows [an idiot] to not directly admit their beliefs, but at the same time not deny them in the least.

their words are riddled with implications, but always have semantic loopholes for them to worm their way out of accountability

my favorite and probably the best debating tactic is the classic...

I'm rubber and your glue, anything you say bounces off of me and sticks to you

Originally posted by Schecter
hat reminds me

IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134:

if your opponent has gained the upper hand in a thread, bend him over and anally rape him into submission. this may lead to a weak and resigned whimper and then a terrified silence

👆 That sounds like my kind of debating tactic

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
👆 That sounds like my kind of debating tactic

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
boy, that was a fast week.

Uh, don't even try it, I'm not the one who made that comment

Besides, i owe you nothing

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
👆 That sounds like my kind of debating tactic

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
👆 That sounds like my kind of debating tactic

I have had sex with a Christian, but never a Muslim.

😂

It's not that I don't like Muslims, i just never met one that I was attracted to...or maybe i did, i dunno

Originally posted by lord xyz
He found out he had no friends and bashed some members because of it.

Was one of them a moderator? It has no reason as to why he was banned.

Once again, not to sound like an idiot, but... what is "trolling"?

pvs: me

trolling: bashing/insulting/attacking/ another member in a public forum, and essentially killing discussion (see previous page)

topic: idiotic debating tactics

Originally posted by Schecter
trolling: bashing/insulting/attacking/ another member in a public forum, and essentially killing discussion (see previous page)

And almost always with the sole intent of killing the discussion.

in this case, certainly...

odd, since we're kinda back on topic

ARTIFICIAL REALTY

most likely a product of brainwashing from within an isolated community of like-nonthinkers.
most often geographically isolated to some degree as well.

but wait, thats just a disposition and not a tactic...right?

until they engage in a debate and use their own point of view as an absolute...then it becomes tactic. the tactic is to attempt to convert you to their reality through constant lengthy literal conditioning.
of course the delusion being that anyone takes them seriously.

the method seems to respond with lengthy fluff posts with 90% filler.
mostly anecdotal jargon and junk theory (i wont even call it "junk science" because no degree of research is applied, slanted/botched or otherwise), but rather things just made up on the spot.
why? in most cases to push a particular agenda

with their minds they can reinvent humanity, nature, and god in their own special way.............even apart from their own peers.............and we get spammed with it.

so what your left with is a forever running deluded epiphany.
'the source of all truth and realisation' .....only nobody's really listening or caring.

(not to be mistaken with psychosis)

No names no one seen to be following that rule!Jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
No names no one seen to be following that rule!Jm

Better put them on the list.