Idiotic Debating Tactics

Started by Schecter75 pages
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
No names no one seen to be following that rule!Jm

did i mention any names? 😕

it has nothing to do with you jackie. i promise.

i think you're on page 12 😛 j/k

I like you now. What color pills do you take?

they're not strong enough for me to have a conversation with you doped

Originally posted by JacopeX
LOL! Troll? No im not. Im actually giving out my opinion. Not treating it as if it were a slight fact. Better than me? I know you are not trying to say that.....

Im not better than others, and no one is better either.

Incorrect. I am better.

Originally posted by Schecter
i think his scrotum just ached from people swinging from it.

Or Backfire's biting again.

Originally posted by BackFire
Everyone knock of the crap immediately.

If I see anymore attacks I will issue bans.

Jesus Christ....b-but you are Backfire...

Originally posted by Schecter
I (we) was attemting

"(were)", "p"

Originally posted by Schecter
pvs: me

**** you, impostor. I talk to PVS on MSN. You are just a big fraud. Probably whirly...

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
No names no one seen to be following that rule!Jm

IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134

Pretending not to have any clue what is going on.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Better put them on the list.

Ohhh, you posted, lets make sweet, sweet love.

Originally posted by Schecter
they're not strong enough for me to have a conversation with you doped

Ironic

(whirly)

Originally posted by Bardock42

(whirly)

look its a funny idea, but in the end people will mistake him for being far more clever than he really is...not....at all. so i must decline.

Originally posted by Bardock42
IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134

Pretending not to have any clue what is going on.

Got to cross that off of my list of ways to annoy religious freaks. 😐

Originally posted by Schecter
look its a funny idea, but in the end people will mistake him for being far more clever than he really is...not....at all. so i must decline.

Well at least you can appreciate the idea in parts.

Originally posted by Schecter
did i mention any names? 😕

it has nothing to do with you jackie. i promise.

i think you're on page 12 😛 j/k

I know you did not say anything at all.I just saw my name on other post and according to the rules for this thread that no names should be mention.
Sounds fair just want to make sure it keeps that way!Sorry if you thought i was blaming you I am not.jm

IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134

Pretending that you think what is going on but you have no clue!

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134

Pretending that you think what is going on but you have no clue!

💃

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
IDIOTIC DEBATING TACTIC #134

Pretending that you think what is going on but you have no clue!


not me. 😕

People should be open to "What if's" more.

It IS a sign of genius ya know. 😖mart:

Originally posted by debbiejo
People should be open to "What if's" more.

It IS a sign of genius ya know. 😖mart:

wonderful but this is not a debating tactic.

Originally posted by debbiejo
People should be open to "What if's" more.

It IS a sign of genius ya know. 😖mart:

No.

Ah ha, I read it. It IS.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Ah ha, I read it. It IS.

I read you are an idiot multiple times....oh...maybe you are on to something.

Most laymen are confused by intellectual statements of wonder. It's ok, most brilliant people are used to it.

136: Debating for discrimination

Originally posted by debbiejo
Most laymen are confused by intellectual statements of wonder. It's ok, most brilliant people are used to it.

You...are not brilliant.

Far from it.

Originally posted by Schecter
💃

Damn. She really is a psychology student writing a dissertation. She's going to be rich and famous.

Too bad she forgot the "you."

EDIT: Also, how could anyone not realize that Schecter = PVS?