Probably said before. But the partial reading or purposely misunderstanding of sentences is also an annoying debating tactic.
In most debates I would assume the debaters write exactly what they write because they mean exactly what they write.
But oftentimes another debater would assume that they meant something totally different. Read only parts. Or twist the whole meaning around. Can be annoying if you need 7 steps to point out again what you actually meant.
Originally posted by Bardock42What do you mean misunderstanding debators?
Probably said before. But the partial reading or purposely misunderstanding of sentences is also an annoying debating tactic.In most debates I would assume the debaters write exactly what they write because they mean exactly what they write.
But oftentimes another debater would assume that they meant something totally different. Read only parts. Or twist the whole meaning around. Can be annoying if you need 7 steps to point out again what you actually meant.
TACTIC# 67679809089878769876: ACCUSE, THEN VANISH
simple really:
poster 1: *presents arbitrary fact*
poster 2: THATS BULLSHIT!!! you dont what the hell you're talking about! what a stupid thing to say!!!
poster 1: *provides irrefutable evidence*
poster 2: *vanishes from the thread never to return*
quite a simple exchange, yet the member who was attempting to 'pwn' the other and failed will tend to develop a grudge and cross post their bitterness in other threads and forums. each time with the same mission, each time with the same failed results, and each time refusing to acknowledge their failing.