internet badass callout
this one is classic. when proven to be completely false, a wounded member may imply their opponent is being an internet 'badass' or 'tough guy' when no implication of violence, threats, or any physical imposing is made, and no insults or name calling have occured. simple process, really:
member 1: *presents moot point*
member 2: *refutes point utterly*
member 1: *becomes enraged and consumes the thread with accusations of internet badassery*
though many legitemate claims of anonymous internet badassery are made, i notice that its also often claimed baselessly by certain members. the revealing element is their obvious disdain for other members and ready willingness to bring violence into the topic.
"you wouldnt dare say that to my face". sometimes appropriate when one is trolling and harassing, since their motive is clearly to provoke...but its constantly used in situations where no threats or direct character attacks are made. so the implication would be that these individuals wish to do violence to those who prove them factually false or illogical...or why else bring up the issue/label? indeed a classic and very revealing hypocrisy.
Originally posted by Schecter
internet badass calloutthis one is classic. when proven to be completely false, a wounded member may imply their opponent is being an internet 'badass' or 'tough guy' when no implication of violence, threats, or any physical imposing is made, and no insults or name calling have occured. simple process, really:
member 1: *presents moot point*
member 2: *refutes point utterly*
member 1: *becomes enraged and consumes the thread with accusations of internet badassery*
though many legitemate claims of anonymous internet badassery are made, i notice that its also often claimed baselessly by certain members. the revealing element is their obvious disdain for other members and ready willingness to bring violence into the topic.
"you wouldnt dare say that to my face". sometimes appropriate when one is trolling and harassing, since their motive is clearly to provoke...but its constantly used in situations where no threats or direct character attacks are made. so the implication would be that these individuals wish to do violence to those who prove them factually false or illogical...or why else bring up the issue/label? indeed a classic and very revealing hypocrisy.
You wouldn't dare say that to my face kid!!!!! Are you the guy who wants to pound someones sphincter...... You sound...g.......tuff!!!
Why are you always on when I am?
Why are you always in invisible mode?
why dont you take some time and coillect your thoughts (or lack of), proofread, and then hit 'submit reply' instead of editing/adding over and over. i mean, you do that every time and it only reveals just how much time you invest in me. you're supposed to make it look effortless, like this really doesnt mean much to you...right?
Originally posted by Schecter
why dont you take some time and coillect your thoughts (or lack of), proofread, and then hit 'submit reply' instead of editing/adding over and over. i mean, you do that every time and it only reveals just how much time you invest in me. you're supposed to make it look effortless, like this really doesnt mean much to you...right?
What are you talking about?
I edited twice for spelling and punctuation, you act as if you know me. Never assume anything, I don't want to be an ass like you. You should try it.
Effortless?
Edited for the addition of Irony