Classic incridible hulk vs Warior Madness Thor

Originally posted by SuperChangeling
The hulk did more to onslaught than thor could ever do.

maybe, but not more than a warrior madness thor could ever do. and that is where the circumstances change. thor at warrior madness is extremely powerful, and not to mention much more versatile than the hulk could ever hope to be. if you haven't noticed there is a nother thread going on now about whether WM Thor can defeat superman.

i repeat, Superman.

and i think the consensus is that he can, or it would at least be a close match. sadly for you, superman, at his full potential would make extremely short work of hulk. as in seconds short. and if wmt > sm, and sm > hulk, then wmt > hulk.

Originally posted by HisMajestyAC43
maybe, but not more than a warrior madness thor could ever do. and that is where the circumstances change. thor at warrior madness is extremely powerful, and not to mention much more versatile than the hulk could ever hope to be. if you haven't noticed there is a nother thread going on now about whether WM Thor can defeat superman.

i repeat, Superman.

and i think the consensus is that he can, or it would at least be a close match. sadly for you, superman, at his full potential would make extremely short work of hulk. as in seconds short. and if wmt > sm, and sm > hulk, then wmt > hulk.

As I say SO often in this forum - the transitive property does NOT always apply here. There are sometimes other factors.

However, I can indeed say that, in this case, it applies beautifully. Regular Thor is a match for the Hulk, Warrior Madness Thor makes Hulk a skid mark.

thank you.

hulk baby, no doubt. gets too strong for twhor, er thor.

Originally posted by HisMajestyAC43
maybe, but not more than a warrior madness thor could ever do. and that is where the circumstances change. thor at warrior madness is extremely powerful, and not to mention much more versatile than the hulk could ever hope to be. if you haven't noticed there is a nother thread going on now about whether WM Thor can defeat superman.

i repeat, Superman.

and i think the consensus is that he can, or it would at least be a close match. sadly for you, superman, at his full potential would make extremely short work of hulk. as in seconds short. and if wmt > sm, and sm > hulk, then wmt > hulk.

????? But the hulk defeated WM thor http://www.leaderslair.com/gammapeople/hulksmashes/hulk440.html

He managed to beat him without killing him.

Hulk>warrior madness thor>superman.

Originally posted by Soljer
As I say SO often in this forum - the transitive property does NOT always apply here. There are sometimes other factors.

However, I can indeed say that, in this case, it applies beautifully. Regular Thor is a match for the Hulk, Warrior Madness Thor makes Hulk a skid mark.

Regular thor isnt a match! 😆 😆 😆 😆 The hulk beat him in three punches, wm thor only survives the first 30 punches since wm thor is ten times stronger than regular thor.

Originally posted by SuperChangeling
Regular thor isnt a match! 😆 😆 😆 😆 The hulk beat him in three punches, wm thor only survives the first 30 punches since wm thor is ten times stronger than regular thor.

Wait the Hulk's strength doubles each punch so it would only be ten punches before wm thor fell.

It has never NEVER been stated that hulks strength doubles like that. Unless you got scans. Don't make stuff up. And I'm an avid hulk fan, so you're gonna be hardpressed to prove it.

So, Superchangeling, what about Rune King Thor? How many Hulk punches does he last?

Originally posted by Soljer
So, Superchangeling, what about Rune King Thor? How many Hulk punches does he last?

Enough for RKT to ko hulk, RKT

*wipes brow* Whew! I thought, for a second, that you were TOTALLY oblivious.

Now I see it is just mostly.

Regular, one-armed Thor killed the Hulk and the Thing with ease. Warrior Madness Thor with two arms makes a mockery out of the Hulk.

I am not a fan of the hulk but he is unstoppable compared to warrior madness thor! The Hulk has been proven stronger than superman, the hulk is a HEAVY HEAVY weight, he is the strongest one there is.

Originally posted by Soljer
*wipes brow* Whew! I thought, for a second, that you were TOTALLY oblivious.

Now I see it is just mostly.

Regular, one-armed Thor killed the Hulk and the Thing with ease. Warrior Madness Thor with two arms makes a mockery out of the Hulk.

The hulk beat thor into the ground, then he defeated wm thor without killing him, wm thor was the uncontroled one in that fight, and the hulk beat him at his best.

Just like when hulk broke unslaughts armor. The hulk is simply stronger than wm thor and superman.

Where has the hulk been proven stronger than Superman? Didn't superman lift the Spectre? Didn't he push maggeddon? Jesus! The hulk is strong, but nothing like Superman. The Hulk's best strength feat was the mountain, which is NOTHING compared to the weight of a star system.

And you still ignored that Regular Thor, with one arm, simultaneously destroyed both the Thing and the Hulk.

He didn't lift(if they did, it's just momentarily) the spectre. It was a team effort and they tripped him IIRC. I don't recall him pushing mageddon but i might be wrong on that one.

Originally posted by Soljer
Where has the hulk been proven stronger than Superman? Didn't superman lift the Spectre? Didn't he push maggeddon? Jesus! The hulk is strong, but nothing like Superman. The Hulk's best strength feat was the mountain, which is NOTHING compared to the weight of a star system.

And you still ignored that Regular Thor, with one arm, simultaneously destroyed both the Thing and the Hulk.

The hulks greatest feat was destroying a asteroid twice the size of earth,

Wait what about brakeing onslaughts armor when thor couldnt come close to onslaught.

The hulk was fighting thing when thor snock up on him. Your ignoreing when the hulk took out thor with three punches.

Destroying a big rock is no amazing feat. It is a case of durability and pressure.

Destroying Onslaught's armor was a plot device. SOMEONE had to destroy his corporeal form.

And I still find it funny that you like to reference Hulk knocking around Thor with 'three punches' while Thor KILLED the Hulk with ease.

Originally posted by Soljer
Destroying a big rock is no amazing feat. It is a case of durability and pressure.

Destroying Onslaught's armor was a plot device. SOMEONE had to destroy his corporeal form.

And I still find it funny that you like to reference Hulk knocking around Thor with 'three punches' while Thor KILLED the Hulk with ease.

Yeah he snock up on the hulk, fine thor wins, are you happy?

No, but at least you don't sound like an idiot anymore.

Originally posted by Soljer
No, but at least you don't sound like an idiot anymore.

Look who's talking mister, thor can beat hulk beacuse he snock up on him.