Originally posted by PVS
spin? its spin to point out that you are factually wrong in declaring the topic to be general paedophilia? ok, whatever champdo i think a mental disorder should be allowed? do we as a society have the ability to allow problems to exist? or do they just occur?
and as master of reality you can simply accuse others of "spinning" with no explanation. just say "spin" and run. you win the internet! 👆
a stance? give me yours. all i can see is that you do not support a mental condition which compulses one to have sexual attraction for children. not just someone who is not of legal age, which you instantly and ignorantly tag as "peadophile", but rather one who is attracted to features which are clearly underdeveloped/undeveloped. a peadophile doesn't give a shit about actual age. thats just a number.
Ya, I am solely responsible for the thread taking a different but still related route. Guilty!
Not if that mental disorder causes harm. If someone is a murderer because of sheer mental instability. We do something about it. Both, we allow some problems to exist and they do just occur. The point being?
You are spinning, you are debating against me without taking a stance of why you think I am wrong. Instead you just spewed philosophy my way. In that case we could do it all day and wonder why we even exist as a society, why we have laws, are laws useful etc.
I have given my stance repeatedly, should I copy and paste everything i have said for the last 13+ pages? Yes, I do not support a mental condition that causes harm. Jeffrey Dhamer had a mental condition, should we allow that? Listen, if one adult wants to have his/or her sexual adult partner dress up like a school girl/boy, I could care less; both persons are adults and both are giving adult consent. Are you absolutely certain a pedophile "doesn't give a shit about actual age"?
Your stance?