Paedophile party allowed to run for election

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
What a horrible analogy.... ❌

So you imagine that all 14 year olds are SO clueless about sex, that they have no idea what it is...that thier lack of "sexual wisdom" is so poor, that its equal to shoving a banana up a 5 year old's ass ?

Damn...you must think all 14 year olds are stupid 😆

You are either generalizing greatly, have a bias against the youth, or just live in an isolated part of the world where Sex knowledge is taboo.....

Uhhh...NO.....[b]YOU my freind, need to recognize the difference between a child and teenager. A 5 year old is a child....a 14 year old is not. Can you stop with these horrible, poor, biased analogies please? It's making you look more and more like a blind idiot.... [/B]

True, it was a tasteless analogy, but it proved a point. Consent is not consent regardless of age.

No, I never mentioned anything about 14 year olds being utterly oblivious about sex, pages back I told you I have sex when I was very young with my peers and that is part of maturity process.

There you go again... Bias this or bias that... Listen, why am I biased? I have absolutely nothing to gain from the age of consent being lowered to 12 or 14, I certainly do not want to have sex with children or teenagers. On the other hand you rant and rave how when you were 14 you had sex with a 24 year old man and how much you loved it,how good it was and how you still call this person up to this day for a "casual f@ck". Who's biased now?

Originally posted by PVS
funny since most convicted peadophile sex offenders are or have been married and many have even have kids. do you always pull thoughts from your ass and call it 'fact'?

Being attacted to adults doesn't take away that 'you' as a pedohile are attracted to children because they are children. A person can have more than one sexual attraction.

Originally posted by Robtard
A person can have more than one sexual attraction.

at least we agree on something, which is easy since this is a simple fact.

i guess according to urizon's logic that would mean 'bisexual'? 'trisexual'?

Originally posted by PVS
at least we agree on something, which is easy since this is a simple fact.

i guess according to urizon's logic that would mean 'bisexual'? 'trisexual'?

I think you missunderstood him... I believe he was arguing that pedophiles are attracted to actual age and not just looks. They just don't want to have sex with a 'childish' looking person, they also want to have sex with actual children.

then i misunderstand basic english i guess. what does this say to you then?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Technically, if you are [b]only attracted to women (or men) with child like features, then you are a peadophile. [/B]

Originally posted by PVS
no, thats wrong, technically and factually. peadophiles in many cases can be sexually aroused by mature partners. where did you get that?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Untrue. 👇

Peadophiles aren't attracted to adults. It's like saying a Gay man is attracted to women also....uh no...thats bisexual my freind.

Originally posted by PVS
then i misunderstand basic english i guess. what does this say to you then?

I think his wording was wrong or he missundertood you. I am sure he realizes that many pedophiles, especially men that prey on children are like you say married or in relationships with adults. There are cases where pedophiles can only be aroused by being with children though. It'd be like he said, trying to get a strictly gay man to be aroused and have sex with a woman or vice/versa.

Maybe I'm wrong and he doesn't realize this, but logic would dictate and I really shouldn't be arging for him. So I'll stop.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
However...there was once a time i thought a girl who was only 14 was hott (and I am 20 years old)...she didn't look like an adult. She still looked young....but she has these green eyes...more striking than ANY eyes I have ever seen.

Does that make me a peadophile? She was only 14, she looked 16-ish, but I was mainly attracted to her striking eyes....

Did you have sex with this girl? I'll just approach my point as though you have not.

It is one thing to observe a 14 year old and say that he or she will grow up to be attractive. Every human can do it. Man or woman. Observing a male or a female. It's just a hardwired ability. (An ability that most males are not willing to admit they have in regards to other males.)

For example. My nephew is a very handsome kid. I'm not attracted to him, but I know he's going to be an attractive adult. I can base this on how he looks now and that his parents are attractive. I'm not attracted to my brother, but I know he's empirically attractive. It isn't difficult to find the traits of another human being enviable, male or female.

As for the idea that bisexual is any attraction to a member of the opposite sex, despite preferring the same sex, I'm not sur eI agree. I've had sexual relationships with women, but that doesn't mean I'm bisexual. I've got friends, both male and female, that I've become attracted to after spending large amounts of time with them. That's how I ended up with most of my girlfriends. I imagine that's one of the reasons no one was suprised when I came out, they typically had to make the first move and initiate a relationship. So, I don't consider myself bisexual, because despite knowing a woman is attractive, I can't recall ever being attracted to one from the first moment I saw her.

Im from the netherlands and I gotta say no1 here takes those fools serious. We all piss on thos Paedo's!!
**** em!

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Peadophilia is an adult attraction to a child; not to a teenager. The word peadophile is over used.

~ Kryzula

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Did you have sex with this girl? I'll just approach my point as though you have not.

It is one thing to observe a 14 year old and say that he or she will grow up to be attractive. Every human can do it. Man or woman. Observing a male or a female. It's just a hardwired ability. (An ability that most males are not willing to admit they have in regards to other males.)

For example. My nephew is a very handsome kid. I'm not attracted to him, but I know he's going to be an attractive adult. I can base this on how he looks now and that his parents are attractive. I'm not attracted to my brother, but I know he's empirically attractive. It isn't difficult to find the traits of another human being enviable, male or female.

As for the idea that bisexual is any attraction to a member of the opposite sex, despite preferring the same sex, I'm not sur eI agree. I've had sexual relationships with women, but that doesn't mean I'm bisexual. I've got friends, both male and female, that I've become attracted to after spending large amounts of time with them. That's how I ended up with most of my girlfriends. I imagine that's one of the reasons no one was suprised when I came out, they typically had to make the first move and initiate a relationship. So, I don't consider myself bisexual, because despite knowing a woman is attractive, I can't recall ever being attracted to one from the first moment I saw her.

There is a difference between finding someone attractive, and then being attracted to someone.

The girl I saw....not only did I think she was hott, I also thought she was HOTT......I can't say I have a "crush" on her, cuz I only met her once. But I did find myself physically attracted....

Yet she is so young...she's only 14, and she looks maybe 16ish at most. I don't like 14 year olds, i dont like 16 year olds either....youth turns me off....i like older people (not old farts, but u know....20's-40's I still find hott)

Point is, despite her age and appearance, I found her realllly hottt....I'd probly **** her if there was no law against it.....yet, the only reason I find her hott is because she has the most striking eyes I have ever seen on anyone.

Her childish body is a turn off, her youthful face is pretty but not my type, however her eyes compensate for all of that, enough to the point where If i could legally give her a try, i might.....

Does that make me a peadophile ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
There is a difference between finding someone attractive, and then being attracted to someone.

The girl I saw....not only did I think she was hott, I also thought she was HOTT......I can't say I have a "crush" on her, cuz I only met her once. But I did find myself physically attracted....

Yet she is so young...she's only 14, and she looks maybe 16ish at most. I don't like 14 year olds, i dont like 16 year olds either....youth turns me off....i like older people (not old farts, but u know....20's-40's I still find hott)

Point is, despite her age and appearance, I found her realllly hottt....I'd probly **** her if there was no law against it.....yet, the only reason I find her hott is because she has the most striking eyes I have ever seen on anyone.

Her childish body is a turn off, her youthful face is pretty but not my type, however her eyes compensate for all of that, enough to the point where If i could legally give her a try, i might.....

Does that make me a peadophile ?

Yes.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yes.

How so ?

That's like saying if a straight guy whose only liked girls all of a sudden becomes attracted to one guy, for whatever reason, that he's automatically Gay.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
How so ?

It is one thing to be attracted to an adolescent who appears to be an adult, it is another to be attracted to an adolescent that you know is an adolescent.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
That's like saying if a straight guy whose only liked girls all of a sudden becomes attracted to one guy, for whatever reason, that he's automatically Gay.

Is it your argument that being sexually attracted to and interested in having sex with one adolescent does not make one as a pedophile?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Is it your argument that being sexually attracted to and interested in having sex with one adolescent does not make one as a pedophile?

Yes. She's the only adolescent I've ever been attracted to....and the only reason I was, was cuz of her eyes...nothing else.

She's not even my type....it's not like I like her cuz she's young...or looks young...her eyes are prettier than anyone's I ever seen.

If it weren't for that, I wouldn't be attracted.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Yes. She's the only adolescent I've ever been attracted to....and the only reason I was, was cuz of her eyes...nothing else.

She's not even my type....it's not like I like her cuz she's young...or looks young...her eyes are prettier than anyone's I ever seen.

If it weren't for that, I wouldn't be attracted.

Suppose you meet a 10 year old girl whose eyes are even more pretty than the 14 year old girl in question. If there were no legal repercussions, would you be interested in having sex with her as well?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Suppose you meet a 10 year old girl whose eyes are even more pretty than the 14 year old girl in question. If there were no legal repercussions, would you be interested in having sex with her as well?

What does that have to do with anything? He is not generally attracted to children, not even teenagers, he's not a paedophile by any definition of the word.

yeah, there's no such thing as "oops i'm a peadophile".

mind you, that doesnt mean he's not potentially sexual deviant.
its just that we shouldnt automatically whore the word "peadophile" for
every implication of thinking of sex or having sex with an underage person.

paedophiles are sexually attracted to children. by 'children' i dont mean anyone under a certain age of consent which people generally label as children, but rather i mean people who are clearly not within the grasp of puberty.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Suppose you meet a 10 year old girl whose eyes are even more pretty than the 14 year old girl in question. If there were no legal repercussions, would you be interested in having sex with her as well?

You mean a 10 year old girl who looks like a 10 year old girl ?

Originally posted by PVS
yeah, there's no such thing as "oops i'm a peadophile".

mind you, that doesnt mean he's not potentially sexual deviant.
its just that we shouldnt automatically whore the word "peadophile" for
every implication of thinking of sex or having sex with an underage person.

paedophiles are sexually attracted to children. by 'children' i dont mean anyone under a certain age of consent which people generally label as children, but rather i mean people who are clearly not within the grasp of puberty.

Pedophilia is the paraphilia of being sexually attracted to prepubescent or peripubescent children. This includes children and young adolescents near the average age of puberty.