Poll
12%
88%
Re: wtf? Brandon Routh to pose nude for playgirl for $500,000
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
I don't think the director would mind personally since he's gay but what about the fans?I think it would be the biggest mistake of his life. He can kiss anymore Superman movies goodbye.
Uh oh, Dance_Inside. You better get on this. Sounds like Brandon's getting drafted for the other team...
Re: Re: wtf? Brandon Routh to pose nude for playgirl for $500,000
Originally posted by Eis
What is that supposed to mean?
That Singer is openly gay. No big secret.
The poster is obviously making a joking reference to the director's homosexuality and Routh's rumored consideration of a Playgirl layout. Playgirl's subscription base is widely known to primarily consist of gay men. Again, no big secret. Thus, the joke goes something like this: Routh's "Nude Layout"-Playgirl-Singer eagerly anticipating Routh's centerfold spread (Pun intended).
Re: Re: wtf? Brandon Routh to pose nude for playgirl for $500,000
Originally posted by Dr. Zaius
Uh oh, Dance_Inside. You better get on this. Sounds like Brandon's getting drafted for the other team...
Hahahaha shut up!
just kidding..but seriously
I definitly think he shouldn't do this, as much as his body turns me on 😉 I don't like this idea. I think he'll turn it down for sure, hes too much of a small town gentleman...I just really hope he doesn't.
Re: wtf? Brandon Routh to pose nude for playgirl for $500,000
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
I don't think the director would mind personally since he's gay but what about the fans?I think it would be the biggest mistake of his life. He can kiss anymore Superman movies goodbye.
Just becauase Singer is gay, he'll go after any man, right?
Stupid comment. That's not the issue at all.
It may not be wise for him to take this offer, but playing Superman shouldn't dictate other film roles for him, either. If he had a role that required nudity or a sex scene, should he say no because he plays Superman in the movies?
Originally posted by Draco69A conservative who has premarital sex, impregnates a woman out of wedlock, leaves her and comes back 5 years later to stalk her...
Because Superman is as conservative and sacred as apple pie and the American Flag.If the star playing Superman sports a large erection and spreads his ass cheeks for Playgirl, than it would reflect badly on Superman.
It would tick off alot of people.
Re: Re: wtf? Brandon Routh to pose nude for playgirl for $500,000
Originally posted by roughrider
Just becauase Singer is gay, he'll go after any man, right?
Stupid comment. That's not the issue at all.
It may not be wise for him to take this offer, but playing Superman shouldn't dictate other film roles for him, either. If he had a role that required nudity or a sex scene, should he say no because he plays Superman in the movies?
Relax Double R. Don't blow an eye socket, I was kidding about the gay thing. What do I know and care about what Singer thinks. On top that it's beside the point. Realign your brain for me.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
A conservative who has premarital sex, impregnates a woman out of wedlock, leaves her and comes back 5 years later to stalk her...
Consider it an unofficial rule that no actor currently playing Superman is allowed to purposely expose his male genitalia for millions of people during his tenure as Superman. The aftermath places merchandising/advertising of any Superman film into extreme jeopardy especially when particularly reaching out to those demographics of 5-13 year-old children (not to mention outraged parents).
Recipe for disaster which results in the lead role being recast....
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Didn't he receive $2 million for "S.R."?Some people won't make half that in a lifetime.
I'd heard it was much less...
Originally posted by Praylu
Consider it an unofficial rule that no actor currently playing Superman is allowed to purposely expose his male genitalia for millions of people during his tenure as Superman. The aftermath places merchandising/advertising of any Superman film into extreme jeopardy especially when particularly reaching out to those demographics of 5-13 year-old children (not to mention outraged parents).Recipe for disaster which results in the lead role being recast....
i'd have thought it was just plain common sense... 😛